Guest guest Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 " Successful colonization of the human host by bacterial pathogens requires that bacteria overcome strict iron (Fe) limitations imparted by the host (1, 2). In humans, the amount of free Fe (~10^- 18 M) (3) is well below the levels required to support the growth of most bacteria (10^-6 to 10^-7 M) (4). At the onset of infection, host cells increase the production and secretion of lactoferrin to limit further available Fe and inhibit bacterial growth (5). To overcome this Fe restriction, pathogenic bacteria have developed specialized systems that aid in the acquisition and assimilation of Fe. However, this does not seem to be the case for Borrelia burgdorferi. " http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/288/5471/1651#T2 I knew Bb used Mn in place of Fe. I've just been learning in chem about chelators... and had a faint brainstorm that maybe excretion of host Mn could harm Bb and be responsible for some clinical findings re chelation... or whatever. Interestingly, it appears that the human requirement for Mn may be rather low, as pubmed gives the impression that symptomatic deficiency is rare. However, it appears that unlike L. plantarum, which also requires no Fe, Bb does not contain a great deal of Mn, tho it does require Mn for growth: " Expressed as nanomoles of metal per milligram of protein Mg Ca Mn Fe E. coli 146 46 0.79 4.2 T. denticola 71 35 0.24 3.5 L. plantarum 120 4.5 150 < 0.05 B. burgdorferi 94 43 1.9 < 0.05 " The article doesnt mention whether the mammal sequesters Mn as it does Fe. Presumably not, tho who knows if anyone has ever tried to find out. " Mean values in serum for Mg were 1.72 µg/l (± 0.19) for [human] controls " and slightly higher for diabetics. I cant figure out how much of that may be free or bioavailable to bacteria. http://www.ams.ac.ir/AIM/0033/nour0033.html Bastards! What *do* they need? I wonder if their Fe non-requirement, unique amongst pathogenic bx, is quite significant in their successful persistance. Other bx fight Fe sequesteration using Fe- acquiring proteins called siderophores, obviously with some success, but perhaps at a cost both in energy and stealth. I wonder if any of the special non-metal-containing Bb metabolic enzymes are particularly free of any human analogues and might therefore make suitable high-specificity drug targets - jes' a meek brainstorm from yers truly, tho I dont know the first thing about bacterial metabolic enzymes and their analogicity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.