Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Jerry- abx/the brain, etc

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi Jerry:

You have made several points (as you have in the past) that fits

nicely with either my observations of sick animals, my own illness,

and my observations of an apparent dependance on antibiotics (after

long term use).

We have discussed this before - but I'm glad you brought it up

again:

JERRY WROTE:

As I have said before, my own opinion is that the inappropriate brain

functioning is actually an inherited, pre-conditioned " hibernation

response " as a result of the immune system discovering a infection.

BARB replies:

If we observ our animals - domestic or wild - this is exactly what

they do. They iiediately hunger down, lick their wounds and sleep.

What do we humans do? Quite the opposite.

JERRY WROTE:

The above discussion of antibiotics reveals the ways in which for some

folks abx's may interfere with the brain's inappropriate functioning,

and relieve some patients of most of those symptoms associated with

the 'hibernation response'.

BARB REPLIES:

From my own observations with abx, and in discussions with others,

I also think there is an adaptive or compensatory (brain) mechanism

that occurs after some specific time on many abx, that for lack of a

better word the abx becomes 'addictive' , therefore causing adverse

symptoms when one quits them 'cold turkey'. And some of us may be

more suseptible than others to certain abx.

And for others, there may be more specific effects with brain

chemistry as in my case with Doxycycline. Within 5 weeks of use,

although obviously effective on my Lyme , it also started to give

me nightmares, these progressed to night terrors in the classical

sense, then progress to what I call Daymares (others may call it

waking hallucinations) which were preceeded by a few seconds of

extreem sleepiness (almost like narcolepsy), which I think was a

change in brain wave.

It was at this point I decided I needed to go off the Doxy, and

found to my surprise (and thru trial and error) I had to WEAN off

the stuff, or I experienced a myriad of symptoms (but symptoms of

what?) if I stopped cold turkey.

JERRY WROTE:

The above discussion of antibiotics reveals the ways in which for some

folks abx's may interfere with the brain's inappropriate functioning,

and relieve some patients of most of those symptoms associated with

the 'hibernation response'. The curative, final solution for most of

us will be to follow Tony and Barb's lead of finding out what

infections we are saddled with and the best way to eliminate them

while using nutritional and lifestyle strategies designed to help

overcome any likely genetic defects and/or results of long term

illness (like the dreaded couchpotatoatosis).

BARB REPLIES:

My theory is that our own genetic make up (which can possibly be

broken down into tissue type groupings) will determine how each group

will present when challenged with a paticular pathogen or subsequent

group of pathogens riding on the coat-tails of the primary.

The genetic make up of the P450 system will determine how we react

to the drugs (and drug combo's) that use this metabolic pathway.

I look at it like guerilla war. Good intelligence and judicious use

of weapons. I don't like a carpet bombing approach.

Barb

wrote:

As I have said before, my own opinion is that the inappropriate brain

functioning is actually an inherited, pre-conditioned " hibernation

response " as a result of the immune system discovering a infection.

Like the 'fight or flight' stress response. Almost all of

our ancestors lived in small family or tribal units, and I see the

'hibernation response' as a survival strategy for both the group (high

priority) and the individual (low priority). The families that had the

best chance of survival were those who's members, when sick with a

contagion, isolated themselves from the rest of the group.

The very symptoms that we are burdened with;

light sensitive with muscle weakness and pain, fatigue, no appetite or

sex drive...

These 'pains' are the enforcers of isolation, the protectors of group

survival. We should not be amazed at just how debilitating these

symptoms are, they are the result of many generations of our families

surviving the plagues and other ravages of living in an environment

full of creatures that like to make us their home.

The difference between then and now is that now we are saddled with

these symptoms chronically, whereas our ancestors either got well or

died within weeks. And as the years wind on, we accumulate more

symptoms that are not part of the 'hibernation response', but picked

up as a result of inactivity and compromised immunity.

To make a long story short, when I see a brain scan that shows

hypoperfusion of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, I see that as

evidence of an infection produced inflammatory immune response, with a

good chance that there is a genetic flaw acting as a catalyst to keep

one's brain in what today (thanks to abx, there are very few life

threatening contagions around) is an inappropriate feedback loop.

The above discussion of antibiotics reveals the ways in which for some

folks abx's may interfere with the brain's inappropriate functioning,

and relieve some patients of most of those symptoms associated with

the 'hibernation response'. The curative, final solution for most of

us will be to follow Tony and Barb's lead of finding out what

infections we are saddled with and the best way to eliminate them

while using nutritional and lifestyle strategies designed to help

overcome any likely genetic defects and/or results of long term

illness (like the dreaded couchpotatoatosis).

Jerry

> >

> > > Geez. I really don't have the energy to be called to task and

> > asked

> > > to reproduce an entire conversation and besides I can't do that.

> >

> >

> > I asked you to clarify the meaning of that portion of the

> > conversation which you paraphrased to us. You referred to the

> > rapidity with which Dr. Fallon's patients relapse following the

> > discontinuation of Rocephin.

> >

> > You said,

> >

> > " Fallon seems to think (in conversation/interview) that

> > patients may relapse so rapidly off rocephin because.... "

> >

> > So I asked you,

> >

> > " So I just want to clarify: he's not now saying that all his Lyme

> > patients relapse rapidly following cessation of Rocephin, is he? "

> >

> > Since you are the one who talked to him about the rapidity with

> > which his patients relapse following the discontinuation of

> > Rocephin, I am asking you if he gave you some idea about the

> > incidence of this problem. Do most of his patients relapse

> > rapidly, or is this relatively uncommon?

> >

> >

> > > Please refer to the Nature paper. I have nothing to clarify.

> >

> >

> > The Nature paper did not report on how Dr. Fallon's patients

> > respond to Rocephin. You did. That is why I asked you to

clarify

> > what you meant.

> >

> > It took only a couple of months for the NEJM to use the Nature

> > paper to take a shot at Lyme activism (see my post #1328). The

> > NEJM article states that the benefits that are seen with the use

of

> > Rocephin are being used by some people as evidence that

> > certain patients indeed have Lyme. But the NEJM article uses

> > that Nature paper to undermine that argument. Now you are

> > reporting that Dr. Fallon has patients that relapse rapidly off

> > Rocephin; too rapidly to be accounted for by a rebound in

> > bacterial population.

> >

> > You appear then, by way of Dr. Fallon, to be lending weight to

the

> > NEJM's position.

> >

> > That's OK. But the next question is: how much credibility will

> > Lyme patients lose if they do not address this issue

proactively?

> > A good fall-back position is for patients/LLMDs to say that, in

> > accordance with the Nature paper and the criticism of Lyme

> > activism that appears in the NEJM article, Rocephin may indeed

> > be palliative by way of glutamate transport, but at least this

> > demonstrates glutamate toxicity in patients that had been

> > otherwise shunned by the medical community. That is, those in

> > the medical establishment who shun sick people can not use

> > the Nature paper to undermine the LLMDs that these patients

> > turn to with out simultaneously acknowledging the glutamate

> > toxicity occuring within the patients they (the conventional

> > doctors) have abandoned.

> >

> > Lyme activists need to use the Nature paper to their own

> > advantages, and not have it used against them. But that can't

> > happen until we get clear on the extent to which Rocephin is

> > palliative vs. curative.

> >

> > Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Barb

Just reading the last part about targeting as opposed to carpet

bombing with abx. I just found that doing a penicillin for egs.

early in the piece I would get one or two hours of relief followed

by a 4 hour wait to get my next dose of pain relief.This was

remedied by INCREASING THE DOSE. Unlike the other folk I stopped

believeing stories when I observed this simple phenomena. More pain

experienced... increase drug level, Increased drug level saw vein

after vein after, sore rib, all slowly give up there pain and

discomfort(infection).But this also paved the way into what's truly

going on MASSIVE INFECTION as opposed to whimpy science and poor

story telling.When your down with these conditions it's only capable

of resolving if you take similar strategies to a smaller but

identical infection " tuberculosis " .Could you imagine how silly some

others look when trying to convince us that the tetrtacycline group

can be used at 6 mg a day and the equivalent TB ilness when deciding

to use this drug they give it at doses of 12 grams a day 1000 times

more approx...than the supposed therapeutic crapola fed to

us.Tetracyclines aren't used for TB but a study showed how they

could be used... I can't recall but when used it was at the extreme

level due to the seriousness of an infection that kills a couple of

million a year.

BArb

You also are an extreme case because serious infections often see

the person loose the spleen to eradicate the infection, so whjat

works for you may not be appropriate for the spleened amongst

us.This one is truly food for thought because your infections

responded alot nicer to the same drug groups used by so many without

your type of luck.

tony

> > >

> > > > Geez. I really don't have the energy to be called to task

and

> > > asked

> > > > to reproduce an entire conversation and besides I can't do

that.

> > >

> > >

> > > I asked you to clarify the meaning of that portion of the

> > > conversation which you paraphrased to us. You referred to the

> > > rapidity with which Dr. Fallon's patients relapse following

the

> > > discontinuation of Rocephin.

> > >

> > > You said,

> > >

> > > " Fallon seems to think (in conversation/interview) that

> > > patients may relapse so rapidly off rocephin because.... "

> > >

> > > So I asked you,

> > >

> > > " So I just want to clarify: he's not now saying that all his

Lyme

> > > patients relapse rapidly following cessation of Rocephin, is

he? "

> > >

> > > Since you are the one who talked to him about the rapidity

with

> > > which his patients relapse following the discontinuation of

> > > Rocephin, I am asking you if he gave you some idea about the

> > > incidence of this problem. Do most of his patients relapse

> > > rapidly, or is this relatively uncommon?

> > >

> > >

> > > > Please refer to the Nature paper. I have nothing to clarify.

> > >

> > >

> > > The Nature paper did not report on how Dr. Fallon's patients

> > > respond to Rocephin. You did. That is why I asked you to

> clarify

> > > what you meant.

> > >

> > > It took only a couple of months for the NEJM to use the Nature

> > > paper to take a shot at Lyme activism (see my post #1328).

The

> > > NEJM article states that the benefits that are seen with the

use

> of

> > > Rocephin are being used by some people as evidence that

> > > certain patients indeed have Lyme. But the NEJM article uses

> > > that Nature paper to undermine that argument. Now you are

> > > reporting that Dr. Fallon has patients that relapse rapidly

off

> > > Rocephin; too rapidly to be accounted for by a rebound in

> > > bacterial population.

> > >

> > > You appear then, by way of Dr. Fallon, to be lending weight to

> the

> > > NEJM's position.

> > >

> > > That's OK. But the next question is: how much credibility

will

> > > Lyme patients lose if they do not address this issue

> proactively?

> > > A good fall-back position is for patients/LLMDs to say that,

in

> > > accordance with the Nature paper and the criticism of Lyme

> > > activism that appears in the NEJM article, Rocephin may

indeed

> > > be palliative by way of glutamate transport, but at least this

> > > demonstrates glutamate toxicity in patients that had been

> > > otherwise shunned by the medical community. That is, those in

> > > the medical establishment who shun sick people can not use

> > > the Nature paper to undermine the LLMDs that these patients

> > > turn to with out simultaneously acknowledging the glutamate

> > > toxicity occuring within the patients they (the conventional

> > > doctors) have abandoned.

> > >

> > > Lyme activists need to use the Nature paper to their own

> > > advantages, and not have it used against them. But that can't

> > > happen until we get clear on the extent to which Rocephin is

> > > palliative vs. curative.

> > >

> > > Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Tony:

As I wrote that sentence about selective weapons V carpet bombing-

I thought about you, and thought I should clarify.

I agree the dosages should be as high as possible when selectively

choosing abx or abx combo's. What I meant about carpet bombing- was

using chemical classes against the pathogens that are basically

worthless - but damages the body.

The Docs think that I may have splenic tissue splattered trough out

my body cavity or an auxillary spleen attched to the pancreas (as

that's mis-shappened) , as they said I should have died long ago

otherwise.

Because of my (internal) anatomy - I might not have the luxury of

abx 'mistakes' others can make- and conversely, I may respond better

to abx if I choose correctly.

Barb

PS... and I may not be an anomoly- how many people have had a full

torso ring CATSCANs? There coupld be other people out there

born without a spleen. I didn't even find this out until 2001.

> > > >

> > > > > Geez. I really don't have the energy to be called to task

> and

> > > > asked

> > > > > to reproduce an entire conversation and besides I can't do

> that.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I asked you to clarify the meaning of that portion of the

> > > > conversation which you paraphrased to us. You referred to

the

> > > > rapidity with which Dr. Fallon's patients relapse following

> the

> > > > discontinuation of Rocephin.

> > > >

> > > > You said,

> > > >

> > > > " Fallon seems to think (in conversation/interview) that

> > > > patients may relapse so rapidly off rocephin because.... "

> > > >

> > > > So I asked you,

> > > >

> > > > " So I just want to clarify: he's not now saying that all his

> Lyme

> > > > patients relapse rapidly following cessation of Rocephin, is

> he? "

> > > >

> > > > Since you are the one who talked to him about the rapidity

> with

> > > > which his patients relapse following the discontinuation of

> > > > Rocephin, I am asking you if he gave you some idea about the

> > > > incidence of this problem. Do most of his patients relapse

> > > > rapidly, or is this relatively uncommon?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Please refer to the Nature paper. I have nothing to clarify.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The Nature paper did not report on how Dr. Fallon's patients

> > > > respond to Rocephin. You did. That is why I asked you to

> > clarify

> > > > what you meant.

> > > >

> > > > It took only a couple of months for the NEJM to use the

Nature

> > > > paper to take a shot at Lyme activism (see my post #1328).

> The

> > > > NEJM article states that the benefits that are seen with the

> use

> > of

> > > > Rocephin are being used by some people as evidence that

> > > > certain patients indeed have Lyme. But the NEJM article uses

> > > > that Nature paper to undermine that argument. Now you are

> > > > reporting that Dr. Fallon has patients that relapse rapidly

> off

> > > > Rocephin; too rapidly to be accounted for by a rebound in

> > > > bacterial population.

> > > >

> > > > You appear then, by way of Dr. Fallon, to be lending weight

to

> > the

> > > > NEJM's position.

> > > >

> > > > That's OK. But the next question is: how much credibility

> will

> > > > Lyme patients lose if they do not address this issue

> > proactively?

> > > > A good fall-back position is for patients/LLMDs to say that,

> in

> > > > accordance with the Nature paper and the criticism of Lyme

> > > > activism that appears in the NEJM article, Rocephin may

> indeed

> > > > be palliative by way of glutamate transport, but at least

this

> > > > demonstrates glutamate toxicity in patients that had been

> > > > otherwise shunned by the medical community. That is, those

in

> > > > the medical establishment who shun sick people can not use

> > > > the Nature paper to undermine the LLMDs that these patients

> > > > turn to with out simultaneously acknowledging the glutamate

> > > > toxicity occuring within the patients they (the conventional

> > > > doctors) have abandoned.

> > > >

> > > > Lyme activists need to use the Nature paper to their own

> > > > advantages, and not have it used against them. But that

can't

> > > > happen until we get clear on the extent to which Rocephin is

> > > > palliative vs. curative.

> > > >

> > > > Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...