Guest guest Posted May 26, 2005 Report Share Posted May 26, 2005 I *certainly* dont mean to recommend corticosteroid treatment, and I know some here have experienced harm from it. The following is just a matter of scientific probing. The question is: does the fact that corticosteroid treatment of idiopathic inflammation is generally not a gigantic disaster argue that the white cell is the major target of the parasites we are concerned with here? Suppose you have an extracellular disease like leprosy, which (according to some webpage I read once) likes alot of different cells. If you use corticosteroids you might halt immune-mediated tissue damage, but presumably the bacteria would multiply greatly and you would have a thunderous relapse afterwards. Anyone know of any data? I know some people with idiopathic inflammation have relapsed to new lows after corticosteroid treatment, but I am talking about really marked new lows. I'm looking more for bodies of data than personal experience. What about viruses that target non-white cells? Can corticosteroids cause their violent intensification? I know corticosteroids can revive suppressed syphilis infection in the rabbit. Syphilis is generally considered extracellular (with some dissent). And corticosteroids lead to higher spriochete counts in lyme borreliosis of macaques (Pachner). But is the macaque disease a good model of the human one on a cellular level (to name one difference, I'm not sure Pachners macaques are very symptomatic)? I know there exist observations conflicting with this particular perspective - but as always with these diseses observations are in somewhat in conflict, so Ive just been weighing this perspective in terms of its own intrinsic logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.