Guest guest Posted October 13, 2003 Report Share Posted October 13, 2003 Dear Lyn I know the lady who was the first to have sentinel node biopsy by the dr pioneering the technique. This is based in Surrey originally. She is very involved now in breast care support and fundraising. She is also very knowledgeable about sentinel node biopsy, and i'm sure would be happy to talk to you if you wanted to. Contact me on 01359 251552 if you want to discuss this any further. best wishes, Message date : Oct 13 2003, 01:04 AM From : jonathan treasure To : ukherbalist Copy to : Subject : Re: Collective Knowledge Breast Cancer Dx > Dx Following a recall on 3 yearly mammogram, I had further mammograms, ultra > sound and cone biopsy on Mon 29th Sept, the results on Mon 6th Oct showed I > have a ductal tumour, left breast, lower inner quadrant stage 3. Hey Lyn, May I offer some " strategic " advice - I know it is a shock , but you need to slow right down. Initially, do as much investigation on the tumor as possible. For example, stage 3 is a " preliminary staging " . Technically you are not yet staged. ( sure you did not mean ?) Final staging will have to be confirmed by post surgical pathological verification and the sentinel node and possibly further screening. Accurate staging is important because it determines treatment options and outcomes. DO NOT get involved in treatment choices until you have maximum information of which accurate staging is essential but only part of the story.. It is not at all unusual to be rushed into oncological treatments out of sheer terror, and then regret them profoundly afterwards after learning more. Hindsight....... You need a minimum of 1. Tumor grade 2. Accurate clinical staging. Sentinel node, CT liver and x ray lung, etc for ruling out metastatic progression if + sentinel 3. Receptor status : minimum ER, PR HER2-neu. 3. Other tests if available - p53, BRCA1/2 etc > I feel a bit overwhelmed with all the info at the moment with friends rushing > round being supportive and knowing my interest in all things herbal I have > been given info on Paw Paw, Hunza Apricot kernel (? cyanide) the work of a > health researcher Day (Cancer the winnable War) and many other things. Do not waste time investigating " fringe " CAM treatments until you have understood your own malignancy, its identity, nature, and likely course of progression in terms of the best available medical science. Unfortunately medical oncologists are not always the most enlightened or adventurous of physicians so getting that information together can be an uphill battle. To be honest we have had more than one patient from the UK who was frustrated with the oncology advice they were receiving there. Then study the mainstream options - surgery-radiation-chemo-endocrine therapies. Study the side effects and outcomes and decide what you YOU feel OK about . If curing cancer was an exact science, it would not be the problem it is today. The mainstream knee-jerk surgery/radiation/adjuvant endocrine program is by no means always curative, nor necessarily what you might want to do. Our practice has more breast cancer patients who have declined one , two or all conventional treatment arms I mentioned and are doing just fine,( with regular MRI monitoring) than those who went totally with all three . The main point is that each person came to their own decision based on a deep investigation using all available modern resources (including us) to provide information, but in the end, the available data is often inconclusive with regard to selecting the treatment plan from many options, and it has to be squared with your own internal decision/intuitive process and overall personal goals and situation. >time to check it all out. I realise the time and effort that > goes into researching anything well, but if any of you have an interest in, or > knowledge of orthodox/herbal treatment you would be willing to share either > via the whole list or with me at herbbower@... I would be grateful. > > > Orthodox Rx by Mr Purushotham at Addenbrooke's. Wide excision removal of > tumour due this Friday 17th Oct, (have been offered to go into a clinical > trial > for sentinel lymph node removal, they have previously done 300 I understand > the > fist 40-50 can be suspect) then 12 weeks after op 4 weeks daily radiotherapy, > then 5 years Tamxoifen. I have mentioned removing the breast (or both) to > not take the tamoxifen; this seemed to go down like a lead balloon (am I > fodder > for their clinical trail). Can you not get a sentinel node without the rad/tamoxifen trial? IF not I would get the sentinel node on the trial, then drop out of the study. (happens all the time) . You need a sentinel node! I know Addenbrooks is " progressive " in that it is a research hospital, so you may be lucky. Do not consider surgery to the contralateral side until the staging is completed. There are good statistical figures on ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence for every stage, so get the data before jumping to conclusions. > Px 54 years old had lumpectomy 15 years ago on left breast for benign lump, > left upper outer quadrant with no further treatment. You should see if the cell block is retained ( it should be). The histology may have been negative, but it can be retested , including for the other features as above now. It could be important. Incidentally at 54 yo, tamoxifen is not necessarily considered superior to aromatase inhibitors, but the choice of either depends on tumor receptor status. Anyway - hope that may possibly help for starters, Treasure, MNIMH, AHG Medical Herbalist Partners For Health, 525 East Main Street, Ashland, OR 97520 tel fax http://www.partnersforhealth.net mailto:jtreasure@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2003 Report Share Posted October 13, 2003 Concerning breast cancer, see the following article: Interim Clinical Results on Acupuncture in Cancer-Treatment: Notes from my Casebook Are Simeon Thoresen DVM Leikvollgata 31, 3213 Sandefjord, Norway. " Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth. Intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his sense in order to justify his logic " . Fjodor Dostojevskij Introduction In 1984 I first tried out a new method in treating cancer, with very promising results in a Dachshund. The dog had mammary cancer (multiple tumours along the nipple line) and had begun to develop dyspnoea - it probably had several lung metastases. I treated LV03 (see rationale below) and in a few weeks the tumours had disappeared almost completely. The dog died several years later from a kidney deficiency. Since then, I have treated about 500-600 patients with all kinds of cancer. Due to the possibility to make an exact Channel Diagnosis as required according to the method described in this article the results were very good in mammary cancer. For the same reason, the results also were very good in melanosarcoma. Results in lymphosarcoma and brain cancer were good, but not as good as in mammary cancer and melanosarcoma. However, my results in liver cancer were not good; the healing rate was zero in the few liver cancers that I have treated. At a seminar in December, 2002, I was approached by Manzetti, research asssistant from the Prostate Cancer group, at the Institute of cellular and molecular biology - the University of Oslo, who showed interest in my results. Through his review of current literature, he organized a meeting with Dr. Med. Ottestad, Chief Medical Officer of the mammary cancer department at the Radium Hospital of Norway. Unfortunately, in spite of the very good overall results, because of time constraints, the details in my case-notes were not of a sufficient at that time. Therefore, Dr. Ottestad urged me to document an unbroken sequence of cases during a certain time-span, and then report the results back to him. This I now have done; my claims of clinical success were taken from my notes only, and the statistics were compiled in a simple manner. Please note that the results of the series documented here were better than those of my previous cases. I told Dr. Ottestad that the overall success rate over the years was circa 70% but that the results in the series reported here were even better; 80% had total disappearance or significant regression of the cancer, and the remaining 20% of cancers showed no further progression. Current conventional treatment of cancer relies mainly on radical surgery, cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation treatment and attempts to boost immune function by chemical immunostimulation, administering biotechnologically produced specific antibodies, or purified interferon, etc. Research on gene-based therapy is in the early stages. Many of these treatments induce severe adverse effects in the patient, and some of these effects can compromise normal organic function, and lead directly to the death of the patient. For example, some patients given cytotoxic chemotherapy develop myocardial hepatic or kidney lesions that can seriously compromise their lives. Over the past 9 years, I have developed an acupuncture protocol to treat cancer-patients, animal and human. Properly used by people trained in the basic principles of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), this protocol has few if any adverse effects. It is based on the following principles: (a) The normal biological activity of bodily cells is to grow and multiply in an orderly, controlled way. For many animals and plants this process continues throughout life. It is only in the case of highly developed animals that growth and cell division stop at a certain age. It is likewise in these species that cancer becomes a " normal " illness. ( Holistic clinicians evaluate the Controlling Processes (CPs) - those that control, or limit, the growth and lifespan of cancerous cells - to be totally normal and essential for health. If growth processes continue throughout life in a controlled way, cancer (uncontrolled processes) occurs to a much smaller degree. The CPs begin to play a more active role when growth is about to stop. They impede further physical development. The higher up the evolutionary tree a species is, the more important normal functioning of these CPs becomes; their importance is maximal in mammals. If the function of the CPs fails, growth processes regain dominance; the cells survive past their normal time to die and cancerous tumours arise. © Many reasons explain functional failure of the CPs. Constant wear-and-tear, and attempts to adapt to day-to-day changes in external and internal environment, stress the CPs of all cellular and bodily functions constantly. In addition to the (External) Stressors and stimuli that adversely influence living organisms, the stressors include shock, strain on the psyche, bombardment with unwanted sounds, visual impressions, additives and electromagnetic influences (high voltage cables, geopathic stress, etc). These stressors can lead to strain on, or loss of dominance of, the CPs, and especially normal functioning of the immune system. (d) The aim of effective cancer therapy and prevention must be to help the patient to maintain the dominance of, or restore the lost function of, the CPs, especially of the immune system. By preventing or limiting immunomediated diseases, including autoimmune diseases and cancer, the immune system is critical for good health. Many methods, from meditation to more or less vegetarian diets, have been developed to re-establish the essential functions of the CPs. But in my experience the most effective of all is to use the Ko Cycle, the body's own Processes to restore control. Thus, the primary aim, the most important function, of holistic medicine is to stimulate the body's CPs. The idea is to " bring control " to cellular growth processes; otherwise they become uncontrolled, which is the basic problem with cancerous cells. If we stimulate the wrong Processes, in this case the Growth Process, we may aggravate the disorder by stimulating tumour growth. In my experience, working via the Ko Cycle (Controlling) Cycle is the best way to stimulate the body's CPs. Written before 200 BC, the Yellow Emperor's Internal Medicine Classic (Huangdi Neijing), was and still is the basic text for practitioners of TCM. It described the fundamental theories of Change, Yin-Yang, Five Elements, Qi-Xue (Energy and Blood), Jing-Luo-Mai (Channel, Collateral and Extraordinary Vessel) relationships, Channel-Organ relationships, External and Internal Pathogenic Factors, the interaction of the body-mind-spirit, etc. Huangdi Neijing teaches that each of the 12 Channels supports another Channel (nourishes its Son Channel) and controls a different Channel (Governs its Grandson Channel). Likewise, each Channel is nourished by its Mother Channel and controlled by its Grandfather Channel. Thus, each Channel has Generative (Sheng) and Control (Ko) functions on its related elements, as follows: Sheng (Generative) Cycle* Liver & Gall Bladder >> Heart & Small Intestine; Triple Heater & Pericardium >> Spleen & Stomach >> Lung & Large Intestine >> Kidney & Bladder >> Liver & Gall bladder Ko (Controlling) Cycle** Liver & Gall bladder X Spleen & Stomach X Kidney & Bladder X Heart & Small Intestine; Triplel Heater & Pericardium X Lung & Large Intestine X Liver & Gall bladder * Where >>=Generates, Nourishes, or Engenders ** Where X=Controls (brings control to), Governs or Prevents Unruliness My protocol in cancer therapy uses the Ko Cycle only. Furthermore, I use only the Yin Channel that Brings Control to the affected organ, whether the cancerous organ (or its related parts) is Yin or Yang. In the Ko Cycle, the Yin-Yang Organ Pairs related to the Elements are: Thus, for example, I use: LV Channel to control cancer of the Spleen (or Stomach, its Yang partner), or of tissues along the course of their Channels, for example, cancer of the lower medial tibia (where SP Channel passes) or mammary cancer (ST Channel passes through the nipple); SP Channel to control cancer of the Kidney (or Bladder, its Yang partner), or of the adrenal gland, ovary, oviduct, uterus, cervix, vagina, testicle, spermatic ducts, seminal vesicle, prostate, penis (all directly related to KI), or cancer of the tissues along the course of their Channels, for example, cancer of the sacrum of the mammary gland (ST Channel passes through the nipple) I adhere to the classical Ko (Controlling) Relationships in most cases but I change my protocol if clinical improvement does not occur within two weeks. Cancer treatment in practice First, one must make an exact Channel Diagnosis by a simple observation of where the tumour has arisen. Let us take mammary cancer as an example. It manifests on ST Channel. We must then stimulate LV, the Ko Controlling Channel of ST. For this, we may use: a.. Either one of the Command Points of the LV Channel b.. A liver-supporting diet c.. Liver-supporting herbs d.. Or a mixture of the factors mentioned It is most important to stimulate only the Ko (Controlling) Grandfather Channel, not the Ko (Controlling) Point of ST itself. During the period of treatment, we should stimulate no other Channel or Process. However, we may combine other therapies that stimulate LV. To bring most cancers under control usually takes 1-3 acupuncture sessions, at inter-session intervals of circa 4 weeks, range but treatment of very severe cancers may continue for 1-2 years. With this protocol I use only acupuncture to treat most types of cancer. Mammary cancer is an exception; in that case I usually administer some helping herbs or diets. This is because the controlling action of the liver is critical to control mammary cancer, and if the diet is very wrong, the liver will not function properly. However, if my patients are receiving medication(s) prescribed by their primary medical doctors or oncologists, I ask them to continue with that. Recent notes from my casebook The 15 cases described below were from an unbroken sequential series, selected from my casebook by date of presentation between April 22nd 2003 and August 17th 2003; they were not " cherry-picked " to show the best outcomes. Also patients treated before April 22nd 2002 that came in for follow-up from treatment or further examination were included. This report includes ALL cancer-cases seen or treated within that time window. Table 1 summarises my treatment protocols and their interim outcomes in 15 patients with confirmed cancer. Table 1: Summary of my treatment protocols and their interim outcomes # Cancer type Progression Patient & treatment sessions Acupoint(s) used and comments Rationale for the selection of the specific Acupoint(s) 1. Seminoma. The left testis is 7,5 cm in diameter Male dog, Golden retriever, 15 years old. LU11 & PC09 Selection from pulse-diagnosis. The testis was at the second session reduced to 6,5 cm. Session 1: 17. June Session 2: 19. August. LU11 PC09 2. Cervical cancer: diagnosed in 2002 Woman, 45 years old TH02 This was used successfully in other cases for many years, and the rationale was pure intuition After monthly sessions from 30. July 2002 to 16. July 2003 the cancer was completely disappeared Session 1: 30 July 2002 Session 2-12: monthly Last session: 16 July TH02 TH02 Th02 3. Malignant mammacarcinoma The carcinoma was ca. 1, cm in diameter Woman, 60 years LV03 ST Channel passes through nipple; LV Controls ST. 26. August. The cancer was " slightly reduced " according to her doctor. 1. treatment 18. June 2. treatment 14. July 3. treatment 26. August LV03 LV03 LV03 4. Cascinoma of the epithelium, with mestastases to several areas. Male dog, Riesenschnauser, 9 years old. HT09 The cancer was situated on the LU-meridian, and HT controls the lung. No change in the situation since the treatment was started 1.session: 15. July 2. session 15. August HT09 HT09 5. Osteosarcoma, size of 12x12 cm. Dog, Gertman Shepard, 8 years old. LU11 The cancer was situated on the GB-meridian, and Lung controls the GB. Session 1: 22. July Session 2:19, August. The cancer is still 12x12 cm. No change. LU11 LU11 6. Lymphosarcoma: with multiple tumours 1.2cm and 2.9 x 3.3cm; 3.7 x 4.3cm and 3.2 x 3.4cm; 2.5 x 4.5cm and 2.5 x 2.5cm. 2.9 x 3.0cm. 3.2 x 3.8cm and 3.3 x 2.7cm horse, Swedish warm blood, born 1997 SI03+BL62, GV01 June 29 after 6 sessions: Tumours were reduced in size by circa 40% Session 1: 7 April Session 2-6: weekly SI03+BL62, GV01 SI03+BL62, GV01 SI03+BL62, GV01 SI03+BL62, GV01 The first tumour appeared on the ventral midline (CV); therefore I treated the opposite midline (GV); For cancer on Dumai, treat, Renmai; for cancer on Renmai, treat Dumai; SI03+BL62 are classical points to treat Dumai. 7. Mammary tumour: 10mm x 8mm Kiri (bitch, Chihuahua, born 1999) The tumours had stopped growing No further tumour development The front, left lump has been reduced from 1 cm. To 0,9 cm. Session 1: 22/4 Session 2: 20/5 Session 2: 20/5 LV03 bilateral ST Channel passes through nipple; LV Controls ST. 8. Mammary cancer: aggressive Woman, 42 years LV03 ST Channel passes through nipple; LV Controls ST. After the last session the cancer was completely gone Session 1: 19/11/02 Then monthly sessions until 25 June 2003: LV03 LV03 9. Mammary tumour: diameter 1.1cm bitch, English setter, born 1996 LV03 Tumour had regressed to 0.2cm after the 1. session. On the 3. session the cancer was almost impossible to detect. Session 1: 17 June: Session 2: 18 July: 3.session: 15. August LV03 LV03 LV03 ST Channel passes through nipple; LV Controls ST. 10. Mammary tumours: (two tumours; Diameter 1.4cm and 1.1cm) bitch English setter, born 1998 LV03 ST Channel passes through nipple; LV Controls ST. Both tumours had regressed to 0.3-0.2cm On the 3. session the cancer was almost impossible to detect. Session 1: 17 June 2003 Session 2: 18 July 3. session: 15. august LV03 LV03 LV03 11. Osteosarcoma: 11cm2 (confirmed by biopsy) dog, born 1994 HT09 left side The cancer was on LU Channel, and as HT controls LU, I used HT09. After the 5. ttreatment: No cancer was found; there was only a piece of dry skin left at the spot. Session 1: November 2002 Monthly treatments until 29. April 2003. HT09 HT09 HT09 .... 12. Perianal cancers: multiple dog, Chihuahua, born 1999 After the first treatments the cancer stopped growing. The defecation was eased, and it has stayed like this since Feb 2002 Session 1: February 2002 Monthly sessions, still going on. CV23 The tumour appeared on the dorsal midline (GV); therefore I treated the opposite midline (CV). 13. Peritoneal-tumours (abdominal with multiple metastases): Abdominal circumference was 67cm - diagnosed with x-ray. dog, born 1989 After the third session the Dog was much better and defecation was now possible, Abdominal circumference was 60cm; as I have no x-ray, I cannot comment on the tumour volume but the dog was much happier and active and glad. Session 1: April 2003 Session 2: April 29 Session 3: 11 June Session 4: 17 July SP06, left side SP06, left side KI02, left side KI02, left side Pulse-diagnosis 14. Prostate cancer: with multiple skeletal metastases Man, 60 years HT09 Pulsediagnosis After the May-session the doctor told him that the cancer had gone dormant and had regressed; PSA was only 48 units [which is good, subnormal); he has had no other treatment Session 1: Autumn 2002 Monthly sessions after that. May 2003 August 2003 HT09 HT09 HT09 HT09 ..... Pulse Diagnosis 15. Lymphatic leucemia Man, 60 years SI18 & LU01 Pulsediagnosis After the treatment started there has been no change in the blood-values 1.session: 18. June 2.session: 17. July 3.session: 18 August SI18 & LU01 SI18 & LU01 SI18 & LU01 Table 2: Summary of my treatment protocols and their interim outcomes Clinical outcome [interim] % of cases Number of Cases Humans 33 5 Dogs 60 9 Horses 6 1 Benign tumors 46 7 Malign tumors 53 8 Not performed cytology of suspected benign tumors 33 5 Not performed cytology of suspected malign tumors 6 1 Performed cytology of total cases 60 9 Total disappearance of visible tumours in total cases 20 3 Total disappearance of visible benign tumors 0 0 Total disappearance of malignant tumors 20 3 Reduction of size of benigne tumors 40 6 Reduction of size of malign tumors 13 2 No further development of benign tumors (standstill) 6 1 No further development of malign tumors (standstill) 20 3 Death, detectable cancer progression, or marked clinical deterioration 0 0 I encourage medical and veterinary clinicians, and experienced acupuncture therapists, to try my methods in cancer therapy. My clinical experience of the methods over the last 10 years has convinced me that they can very significantly improve the general health and well-being of 90% of cancer-patients (human and animal), and increase the survival rates by 70%. I am willing to discuss the cases with you before you select your points for treatment, and if you need further discussion in preparation for later sessions. I also encourage you to report back to me when you have outcome data on at least 10 cases. If enough clinicians cooperate in a multi-centre clinical trial, we could have a very substantial body of cases to prepare a multi-authored clinical report within 1-2 years. You may email me at: . Acknowledgements I thank Phil MRCVS, Dublin, Ireland, for his criticism and editorial help in the drafting of this article. Are Simeon Thoresen arethore@... http://home.online.no/~arethore/ Collective Knowledge Breast Cancer Dx Dear all All thoughts, comments, info welcome, supportive treatment plans (in case I have missed anything). Dx Following a recall on 3 yearly mammogram, I had further mammograms, ultra sound and cone biopsy on Mon 29th Sept, the results on Mon 6th Oct showed I have a ductal tumour, left breast, lower inner quadrant stage 3. I feel a bit overwhelmed with all the info at the moment with friends rushing round being supportive and knowing my interest in all things herbal I have been given info on Paw Paw, Hunza Apricot kernel (? cyanide) the work of a health researcher Day (Cancer the winnable War) and many other things. I just do not have time to check it all out. I realise the time and effort that goes into researching anything well, but if any of you have an interest in, or knowledge of orthodox/herbal treatment you would be willing to share either via the whole list or with me at herbbower@... I would be grateful. Orthodox Rx by Mr Purushotham at Addenbrooke's. Wide excision removal of tumour due this Friday 17th Oct, (have been offered to go into a clinical trial for sentinel lymph node removal, they have previously done 300 I understand the fist 40-50 can be suspect) then 12 weeks after op 4 weeks daily radiotherapy, then 5 years Tamxoifen. I have mentioned removing the breast (or both) to not take the tamoxifen; this seemed to go down like a lead balloon (am I fodder for their clinical trail). Px 54 years old had lumpectomy 15 years ago on left breast for benign lump, left upper outer quadrant with no further treatment. No family history of breast cancer (Nan died 95 of stomach cancer, aunt died 91 of the same having had a colostomy bag for 15 years. I care for my mum who is 89. Quite good vegetarian diet for 28 years, non-smoker, 2-3 units alcohol per month, but I am very overweight, partially due to lack of exercise. Otherwise have been healthy. I have good friend and family support and in the main am coping OK. I just want to make the best informed consent that I can in the time available as do not want to miss out on the clinical trail if this is the best option. Yours truly Lyn Judge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2003 Report Share Posted October 13, 2003 > Concerning breast cancer, see the following article: > Interim Clinical Results on Acupuncture in Cancer-Treatment: Notes from my > Casebook > > > > Are Simeon Thoresen DVM > Are, You must surely understand it is really impossible to make any assessment of your claims from the schematic information you provide, and as a result I personally do not see it as an especially helpful contribution to the original post request for information. However, if your work is impressive as you say, it should unquestionably be evaluated and properly published in the literature. I would be happy to facilitate an independent validation of your say 3 best human breast cancer cases treated with acupuncture alone that have resulted in disease reversal or remission and survival time of over 5 years . To do so you would need to provide a fully documented report of each case with pathological/imaging data supporting the original diagnosis , the response to treatment, and confirming the absence of any intercurrent interventions. I am acquainted with two or three of the best integrative oncologists in the USA, one of whom is an LAc and Chinese herbalist at Cedars Sinai , who would be happy to undertake such a case review, and provide peer recommendations to the appropriate journals a appropriate. My contact details are below. Treasure, MNIMH, AHG Medical Herbalist Partners For Health, 525 East Main Street, Ashland, OR 97520 tel fax http://www.partnersforhealth.net mailto:jtreasure@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2003 Report Share Posted October 13, 2003 > Hello everyone > > Thanks for the info jonathan and others. > > I hear what you say but have a major stumbling block in the presence > of The Nat Inst. for Clinical Excellence (NICE) their directive states that > all women with a Dx of breast cancer must start their treatment within 4 > weeks of Dx (this is treatment not just being seen by consultant). So delay > may > problematic, (because I took the result well, their words not mine) I was > offered the sentinel trial, because of the possibility of a further op 7 days > later > if nodes prove +tive. I think if I try and postpone it they may think I am > not taking it so well, don't know unless I try it. They know I'm coming in > armed with questions that I want answers to. Lyn , you will probably find, like most ct's, they may have other and equally unnacceptable inclusion critieria. Eg no supplements, no antioxidants, no CAM interventions etc. As a rule of thumb we advise folk to only go for trials as last resort when other therapies have failed and the trial offers something otherwise unobtainable. You can surely get a sentinel without doing their trial? > > At my pre op check up session I asked to see my notes the Tumour grade was > typed in my report as stage 3, ER positive. > My chest xray was clear > As the bone marrow is part of the trial results will be known whenever > possible, as not part of normal treatment plan here. nor here. BRAC positive usually goes to bone marrow biopsy. I was thinking bone scan not marrow, although marrow is great for picking up early/micrometastatic stuff. . You need the HER2 neu. If you are +ve herceptin is a serious option. > CT liver scan not offered > MRI body scans not offered unless there is a need to go to chemo. > I don't think these will be offered on the NHS welcome to Blair's Britain huh. If your sentinel indicated you should have a whole body PET - standard of care. > Had also thought about dropping out of trial myself. Good . > All notes, x-rays, biopsy, notes from previous lumpectomy are missing? Bad > Aromatase inhibitors from what I can find of english research this is not > considered as effective once through the menopause. Nope. AR inhibitors are actually contraindicated pre-menopausally. They are directed against peripheral estrogen formation from androgens, not ovarian production. The 3rd generation drugs are being actively trialled against tamoxifen as first line adjunctive therapies with pretty good results. Persoanlly I don't like them, even the newer ones, because aromatase is a cytochrome (heme based ) enzyme, and there are lots of said enzymes that get messsed up by AR inhibiting driugs, even though the later versions are far better than the first generatuion. > You ought to see the wonderful suite GKWelcome have at Addenbrookes. Lots of > vested interest here need to keep my wits about me. > I can imagine. Trivia: I was born in Addenbrookes - (the old one) if it is still standing. They should put up a blue plaque If you want to email me off list feel free, although I am away for a week from Thursday at the AHG conference in New Mexico. jonathan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2003 Report Share Posted October 13, 2003 Hi all, the article went bad through the mail, so that I attach the web-address for the article. (http://users.med.auth.gr/~karanik/english/articles/apcancer.html) Are Simeon Thoresen arethore@... http://home.online.no/~arethore/ Re: Collective Knowledge Breast Cancer Dx > Concerning breast cancer, see the following article: > Interim Clinical Results on Acupuncture in Cancer-Treatment: Notes from my > Casebook > > > > Are Simeon Thoresen DVM > Are, You must surely understand it is really impossible to make any assessment of your claims from the schematic information you provide, and as a result I personally do not see it as an especially helpful contribution to the original post request for information. However, if your work is impressive as you say, it should unquestionably be evaluated and properly published in the literature. I would be happy to facilitate an independent validation of your say 3 best human breast cancer cases treated with acupuncture alone that have resulted in disease reversal or remission and survival time of over 5 years . To do so you would need to provide a fully documented report of each case with pathological/imaging data supporting the original diagnosis , the response to treatment, and confirming the absence of any intercurrent interventions. I am acquainted with two or three of the best integrative oncologists in the USA, one of whom is an LAc and Chinese herbalist at Cedars Sinai , who would be happy to undertake such a case review, and provide peer recommendations to the appropriate journals a appropriate. My contact details are below. Treasure, MNIMH, AHG Medical Herbalist Partners For Health, 525 East Main Street, Ashland, OR 97520 tel fax http://www.partnersforhealth.net mailto:jtreasure@... List Owner Graham White, MNIMH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2003 Report Share Posted October 13, 2003 In a message dated 13/10/2003 18:31:28 GMT Daylight Time, greenman@... writes: > Lyn , you will probably find, like most ct's, they may have other and > equally unnacceptable inclusion critieria. Eg no supplements, no > antioxidants, no CAM interventions etc. As a rule of thumb we advise folk > to only go for trials as last resort when other therapies have failed and > the trial offers something otherwise unobtainable. You can surely get a > sentinel without doing their trial? > Sorry sentinel not normally available as non standard treatment taking the trial is the only way to get this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.