Guest guest Posted May 24, 2005 Report Share Posted May 24, 2005 I just used pubmeds " related articles " thing and searches on [idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy] and [idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy trace elements] to see what had been done about this since 1999. I was very puzzled to find nothing at all. How can the entire world ignore the ultrastructural oddities and astronomical trace element concentrations reported here? (patient/control ratios were 29 for silver 250 for arsenic 11 for gold 13 for Cr 22,300 for Hg (mercury) 36 for La 12,840 for Sb 14.2 for zinc) <usenethod@y...> wrote: > Sue, > I gave a precis of this paper in I/I messages #1308 and 1309 > > > > <rhbailey@d...> wrote:> > > > Hi , > > > > Did you ever get a chance to take a look at this study that Cheney > > refers to? Since you're going to the library... > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? > > cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=10334427 & query_hl=1 > > > > > > PMID: 10334427 > > > > J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1578-83. > > > > Marked elevation of myocardial trace elements in idiopathic dilated > > cardiomyopathy compared with secondary cardiac dysfunction. > > > > What do you think of this sentence that Cheney referred to? " In > > particular, in pts with IDCM mean mercury concentration was 22,000 > > times (178,400 ng/g vs. 8 ng/g)... higher than in control subjects. " > > > > Sue , > > Upstate New York Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.