Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 Hi all I notice this forum is full of controversy when it comes to pathogens, the thought that it may be a multi pathogen infection doesn't sit well with many one way trafficker's. The other sticking point is people's perception that you only get well when you suffer..The missing the forest for the tree's really sits high in many forums.The most important tool we have is antimicrobials. The study into how and what organisms are effectively treated also runs up red flags and creates stories. The first thing I would do if I wss anyone contemplating a drug is to get 5 to 10 pages printed on all the pro's and con's from as many sites as possable... get the widest variation on the drugs pro's and con's. NOW the fact that there have been over 3000 posts and people are so focused on alot of iffy stuff, they miss the important parts of the antibiotic literatue.............. SUPERINFECTION... By using a drug that isn't killing your organisms you run the rsik of developing SUPERINFECTION. This is an infection that grows under the presence of antimicrobials that aren't doing the job. So when your so called herxing, you may want to reconsider and call it a superinfection.The fact that we don't die and live to tell, makes us comfortable to talk the theory of " I had a herx " . This is something I picked up early in the piece and it was pretty clear on the amoxacillin instruction sheet or possably off the net. tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.