Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 Terry, I would have to disagree with the chart you provided in regards to soccer. Soccer is primarily an aerobic sport. 90 % of the game is aerobic in nature. Then that is supplemented by the anaerobic sprints etc. Tollison Salt lake city Terry Mavroudis wrote: <<Energy System recruitment Although all energy systems basically turn on at the same time the recruitment of an alternative system occurs when the current energy system is almost depleted. The following table provides an approximation of the percentage contribution of the energy pathways in certain sports. (Fox et al 1993) Sport ATP-PC and LA LA-O2 O2(aerobic) Basketball 60 20 20 Fencing 90 10 Field events 90 10 Golf swing 95 5 Gymnastics 80 15 5 Hockey 50 20 30 Distance running 10 20 70 Rowing 20 30 50 Skiing 33 33 33 Soccer 50 20 30 Sprints 90 10 Swimming 1.5km 10 20 70 Tennis 70 20 10 Volleyball 80 5 15 " Table adapted from Fox E. L. et al, The Physiological Basis for Exercise and Sport, 1993 " As you can see by the tables above, the sports you mentioned as being high intensity aerobic are for the most part purely anaerobic before the primary energy system used is exhausted and then moves on to the next available energy source. " Without endurance do you think a boxer would be able to throw a knock out punch in the 15th round after running around the ring, dancing and weaving for 45 minutes? " If the primary energy used in a boxers preparation for a fight is aerobic, chances are that he wont even be able to reach the 15th round or throw any kind of punches with speed or power. Just because 1 round lasts 180 seconds dos not imply that the energy required is aerobic. For the sports that you mentioned, boxing, tennis, soccer, martial arts etc, it would be better to evaluate the energy system pathway from a more simplistic approach and break it down to a " per round, per set, per shift(hockey)per play(football)per point(tennis) view " ect.and from there evaluate the need of the athlete and his weakness. Due to the old school mentality that still exists in boxing, conditioning outside the ring a 3:1 ratio is still very predominant. In my opinion, training them that way outside the ring will do very little to help them and will probably cause injury from overuse. In boxing, basketball, baseball, hockey, tennis, soccer, martial arts, they always explode with high energy output followed by a state of rest and " actively resting " (which for most well conditioned athletes is like a walk in the park) so on and so forth until resting for the sport given interval and back again. Boxing 1 minute per round, tennis has more frequent breaks per set and per match and for the most part energy output is very high and short from a point scored to the next. Baseball being purely (AAP) alactic anaerobic power, in competition(game time) In my opinion, a few major key components in all sports is strength-endurance and the ability to recuperate after a high energy output (being able to perform at peak levels under repetitive high force output conditions) I hope this answers your question somewhat as there is much more we can discuss about this topic.EX:limit strength,strength- speed,speed strength.>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.