Guest guest Posted January 25, 2002 Report Share Posted January 25, 2002 We are a condom couple for now.......what we will do when we have finished having our family, I don't know yet....... I will never go back to the pill. That is why I'm having trouble with irregularity and pmt etc. right now....ggggrrrr. Suzanne dd Ruby 2.7yrs South Wales Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2002 Report Share Posted January 26, 2002 At 02:30 AM 01/26/2002 -0000, you wrote: >We are a condom couple for now.......what we will do when we have finished having our family, I don't know yet....... >I will never go back to the pill. That is why I'm having trouble with irregularity and pmt etc. right now....ggggrrrr. > >Suzanne >dd Ruby 2.7yrs >South Wales I used the cervical cap for many years (now my partner has had a vasectomy -before I met him). Is that still available. Much nicer than a diaphragm but difficult to get out sometimes due to suction! Sheri -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail PO Box 1563 Nevada City CA 95959 530-740-0561 Voicemail in US http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers Education, Homeopathic Education CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2005 Report Share Posted June 4, 2005 A female earthling recently asked me to investigate her birth control. Shes healthy, but a relative of a chronic inflammatory disease patient, therefore may have some predisposition to chronic inflammatory disease. Also, theres a serious family history of heart attacks. Normal family history for cancers. The product is a 3-week-slow-release vaginal suppository that releases X amount per day of a progestin and Y of an estrogen. It looks like they are probably non-bioidentical? http://www.nuvaring.com/Authfiles/Images/309_76063.pdf I am vaguely aware of the bio-identical vs non-bioidentical debate in menopausal hormone replacement therapy. Anyone know any reason (besides patentability) why non-bioidentical stuff would be used? Better pharmacodynamics? Better profile of non-target effects? Of course, contraception is not the same thing as HRT. In HRT at least, it does seem rather illogical to me, on the face of it, not to use bioidentical stuff. I am very vaguely aware of something like breast cancer risks being tied to these contraceptives... anything else I should look into? This purports to be a low dose thing. And if this vaginal administration achieves lower systemic levels of the drugs than are achieved by comparable oral contraceptives, that seems like a good thing... (unless it were the case that levels in the reproductive tract from this product are quite a bit higher than with oral hormones, and such were somehow undesirable). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2005 Report Share Posted June 4, 2005 Dear Check out the wok of Ray Peat. This was the stuff that the late Lee based his work on. Regards Windsor [infections] OT: birth control A female earthling recently asked me to investigate her birth control.Shes healthy, but a relative of a chronic inflammatory disease patient, therefore may have some predisposition to chronic inflammatory disease. Also, theres a serious family history of heart attacks. Normal family history for cancers.The product is a 3-week-slow-release vaginal suppository that releases X amount per day of a progestin and Y of an estrogen. It looks like they are probably non-bioidentical?http://www.nuvaring.com/Authfiles/Images/309_76063.pdfI am vaguely aware of the bio-identical vs non-bioidentical debate in menopausal hormone replacement therapy. Anyone know any reason (besides patentability) why non-bioidentical stuff would be used? Better pharmacodynamics? Better profile of non-target effects? Of course, contraception is not the same thing as HRT. In HRT at least, it does seem rather illogical to me, on the face of it, not to use bioidentical stuff.I am very vaguely aware of something like breast cancer risks being tied to these contraceptives... anything else I should look into? This purports to be a low dose thing. And if this vaginal administration achieves lower systemic levels of the drugs than are achieved by comparable oral contraceptives, that seems like a good thing... (unless it were the case that levels in the reproductive tract from this product are quite a bit higher than with oral hormones, and such were somehow undesirable). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2005 Report Share Posted June 4, 2005 Originally when first released the birth control pill would cause thickened blood and many would die from strokes.Until it was tweaked. I would think today's pill is much less of a blood thickener but a blood thickener is till not a smart contraceptive therapy.Many females 4 to 1 over men have these autoimmune conditions and one thing that stands out in the candida forums was the use of the birth control pill. Most females would blame the pill and antiubiotioc therapy for acne followed close behind for there myriad of p[roblems. tony > A female earthling recently asked me to investigate her birth control. > > Shes healthy, but a relative of a chronic inflammatory disease > patient, therefore may have some predisposition to chronic > inflammatory disease. Also, theres a serious family history of heart > attacks. Normal family history for cancers. > > The product is a 3-week-slow-release vaginal suppository that > releases X amount per day of a progestin and Y of an estrogen. It > looks like they are probably non-bioidentical? > > http://www.nuvaring.com/Authfiles/Images/309_76063.pdf > > I am vaguely aware of the bio-identical vs non-bioidentical debate in > menopausal hormone replacement therapy. Anyone know any reason > (besides patentability) why non-bioidentical stuff would be used? > Better pharmacodynamics? Better profile of non-target effects? Of > course, contraception is not the same thing as HRT. In HRT at least, > it does seem rather illogical to me, on the face of it, not to use > bioidentical stuff. > > I am very vaguely aware of something like breast cancer risks being > tied to these contraceptives... anything else I should look into? > > This purports to be a low dose thing. And if this vaginal > administration achieves lower systemic levels of the drugs than are > achieved by comparable oral contraceptives, that seems like a good > thing... (unless it were the case that levels in the reproductive > tract from this product are quite a bit higher than with oral > hormones, and such were somehow undesirable). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.