Guest guest Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should always be considered provisional. Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of less than a years duration isnt worth anything to me. I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 months Ive spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you run across people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. Not a lot of em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I have seen maybe 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 Man, , I think this is so important. When ANYONE tells you they're cured, first ask them how long they've been symptom free (and off treatment). I've fallen for this so many times (hope is addictive) from so many " doctors " and so many patients, just to realize they're not really talking about cures at all. If anyone tells me it's been less than a year, I just think to myself, " wait and see " . Hey, I wouldn't even mind life long treatment if it meant FULL remission of the fatigue. penny > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should always be > considered provisional. > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of less than a > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 months Ive > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you run across > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. Not a lot of > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I have seen maybe > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 As long as something can go dormant, I don't think a " cure " is the right word that we could use to describe any long term remissions. We might be able to go for years without a relapse and I would say that I have been nearly symptom free for about 2 years. I have a very full, pain free, active life now. BUT, I know there is still work to do and I believe 100% that some sort of major stress could put me right back on that slippery slope into hell. We will ALWAYS have to be forever watchful for symptoms that the little buggers are trying to sneak in the back door. > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should always be > > considered provisional. > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of less than a > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 months Ive > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you run > across > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. Not a lot > of > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I have seen > maybe > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 Jelly, do you consider yourself in full remission and would you mind sharing what you did to achieve it? We need all the positive stories we can get so we can weigh the information and see if we can somehow apply aspects of the successful treatment to our own situations. Do you feel completely healthy at this point in time? If so, I may have to see your doctor, since he's near me. Do you think he understands the nature of bone infections and necrotic sinuses? If you don't want to answer so many questions, my main question really, is, what was/is your treatment regimen? (and I suppose your dx) penny > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should always be > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of less > than a > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 months > Ive > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you run > > across > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. Not a > lot > > of > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I have seen > > maybe > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 Exactly why I use the term symptom free. I know I have latent virus I harbour- so why do we think we don't harbour latent bacteria. I probably still have dormant Lyme somewhere - but if they stay dormant for say 30 years, I'll be happy. Barb > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should always be > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of less > than a > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 months > Ive > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you run > > across > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. Not a > lot > > of > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I have seen > > maybe > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 I honestly don't know what full remission would feel like. I have been sick so long, that I am not sure I know what good health entirely feels like. I do know that once I started feeling better, I realized just how gravely sick I was. Compared to how I feel now, I believe I was on death's door. The first thing " we " did was start me on heparin for my positive hypercoagulation. I have recently learned that heparin works very much like Benicar in that it blocks Angiotensin. That is probably why TM is so adament about not using benicar and heparin at the same time, even though he won't say so. I was on that for about a year. Then I deceided to get retested for Mycoplasma, since it was negative the first time, but I knew I had had Myco Pneumonia when I first started getting sick. I went to the lab in Beverly Hills. I came back positive for not just the pnuemonia but fermentans too. We added ABX to the heparin. I herxed like no tomorrow. My ABX dose was way to high with the heparin which makes ABX more potent and penetrate better. I eventually ended up on Minocycline at very low doses, like 3 mgs, every other day, just so I wouldn't herx to bad. Ultimately that's about it. I did not take the ABX constantly, pretty rarely actually, my life just wouldn't allow it. I did the ABX for about 1 year, on and off. I was feeling about 85% whole. Then I was put through MAJOR stress. My daughter who was 3 1/2 months pregnant started looking like she was going to miscarry. Week after week, she didn't but there were numerous trips to the ER in the middle of the night with serious problems. She was on strict bed rest and I had to take care of her and my grand daughter. While this was going on my son was planning his wedding. The stress was so severe that for the first time in my life I had to ask for anxiety meds. On the night before the wedding we again ended up in the hospital thinking for sure my daughter was going to loose what we now knew was a little girl, 5 months along, there were contractions. My daughter said to me, " Mom, if I loose her tonight I still want you to be at the wedding " . Well, the contractions stopped and we all made it to the wedding, including my daughter and family of 11 who were staying at my house. About 2 weeks later my daughter was finally put in the hospital, because she had finally crossed the line, there was a 60% chance of survivial for our tiny girl if she came now. 2 1/2 weeks later she arrived, weighing, 1lb 15 oz. My daughter was in bad shape, as she had lost nearly half her blood volume and had a complicated C- section. Not only was the baby critical, but she had also lost half of her blood volume. We spent the next 3 long, agonizing months in the Neonatal Intensive Care, in a hotel, away from home . About 2 weeks before we got to take our tiny girl home, my dad died. It was horrible. The last time I heard his voice was over the phone while I was sitting in a hotel room near the hospital. He was screaming, out of his head in pain. He had a staph infection in his blood, that had settled on his heart. He lived in Hawaii and they needed to fly him to Oahu for a valve replacement. He died in flight during the emergency transport. The reason I tell you this is I want you to understand the extreme stress I was under. I knew without a doubt I was going to crash hard when this was all over. How could I not? But unbelievably, I never did. Throughout the whole ordeal I stayed on the heparin only. I couldn't take ABX and herx. A few months after a I got home, we deceided we needed a new start and we planned a huge move across country. I didn't know if I could do it. About that time I deceided to try stopping the heparin and replacing it with NattoK. It worked, I've been off the heparin for over a year now. I have taken no ABX until just recently. I did treat for yeast about months ago and that is when I seemed to gain another 10% to bring me to 95% remission, where I am now. That's it. I truly believe that the heparin is a HUGE key. I can't type HUGE big enough. Right now I am pursuing Lyme. I have been bitten over 20 times and now believe that this has been my problem all along, even though I tested negative about 15 years ago. I believe it is was made my dad so ill and weak. It is likely that my mom has it, and that at the least both of my kids have it, maybe my husband. I TRULY wish people would pay more attention to hypercoagulation and the benefits of heparin. > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should always > be > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of less > > than a > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 months > > Ive > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you run > > > across > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. Not a > > lot > > > of > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I have > seen > > > maybe > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Your dad had a staph infection and you want to blame lyme? Neraly 50% of the population is colonised by staph, what the symptoms are of being colonised and what the symptoms are of being ill- is the problem with ALL OF MEDICINE.(no-one gets it) tony > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should > always > > be > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of > less > > > than a > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 > months > > > Ive > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you > run > > > > across > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. Not > a > > > lot > > > > of > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I have > > seen > > > > maybe > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Blame Lyme for my dad's ultimate death.....no. Staph defiently killed him. What you may not know is that my dad had what they thought was Lupus, not sure though. He was going to die soon and was ready to die from whatever it was that he had suffered from for the previous 11 years. He was terribly weakened from what ever this was. He had had an angio gram for the congestive heart failure he had which is often found in Lyme. That is where they believe the Staph was introduced, about 2 weeks before he died. Staph wasn't a problem his whole life, something else was. He was never a very healthy man. Another thing you probably don't know Tony, is that we have a large family cluster of pretty sick people. So my dad had Lupus. My mom has what they think is MS and before that diagnosed FM for about 30 years, going all the way back to the place where ticks are prevelant. I have been FM/CFS for 24 years and have been bitten by no less then 20 ticks, 15-20 if those were found in my hair all at once. We all hiked and lived in the same tick infested area at the same time. I have 2 kids who are both sick. My son suffers from tremors, has had pericarditis and a whole host of other problems associated with Lyme since he was about 15, he's 24 now. My daughter is very sick and struggles to raise he 2 kids, she is 26. My husband is also showing symptoms for about 5 years with no explanation from traditional medicine. With all my KNOWN tick bites, Lyme seems like the next logical explanation to explore. It would seem pretty stupid to ignore the possibility of Lyme, especially since there is treatment, don't ya think? I mean considering my history and all. > > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should > > always > > > be > > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of > > less > > > > than a > > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 > > months > > > > Ive > > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours you > > run > > > > > across > > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. > Not > > a > > > > lot > > > > > of > > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I > have > > > seen > > > > > maybe > > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 My jaw drops when I read your family history and your thinking staph didn't, doesn't, isn't a major part of your family tree. Girl you are my poster staph family.Forget looking for bacteria, waste your money on identifying toxins your family tree sounds like a toxic nightmare and unfortunately the staph species are right up there doing this destruction.I am absolutely furious when people say pericarditis- and then I THINK it's possably a virus that's no longer there, is the doctors response. I went to hospital with a note from my doctor requesting pericarditis to be looked for, unfortuntely you get the no treatment just stories when you go to our hospitals.Anyway good luck on your lyme quest... tony > > > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should > > > always > > > > be > > > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) of > > > less > > > > > than a > > > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last 6 > > > months > > > > > Ive > > > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours > you > > > run > > > > > > across > > > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full resolution. > > Not > > > a > > > > > lot > > > > > > of > > > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I > > have > > > > seen > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 How do you specifically get tested for staph? Other then a blood test? My doctor does that and has tested some of us for staph. My son came back negative. Is it like some of the other pathogens, stealth like? Can we count on that test being accurate? Then what is staph, isn't it a bacteria? It grew a vegetation on my dad's heart valve. Treatment is again ABX, isn't it? I believe we are only scratching the surface of the various pathogens resposnible for making us sick. I actually have a little personal theory. Accumulation of pathognes over the years are what cause us to eventually break down and age. So many of us seem to be aging way before our time. Treating pathogens may be the the proverbial, " Fountain of Youth " . My dad was 67 when he died, he looked to be 90. By the way, my family is the poster family for Lyme too. I am ALWAYS open to looking at new angles. Years ago, my dad had a bout with a majorly swollen knee. He was told it was staph, even though they never tested it. I have recently learned that Lyme can manifest in exactly the same way. Lyme likes to swim in the synovial fluids. Six of one, half dozen of another. They are both donuts/pathogens. Treatment is pretty close to the same. > > > > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures should > > > > always > > > > > be > > > > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be ongoing) > of > > > > less > > > > > > than a > > > > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the last > 6 > > > > months > > > > > > Ive > > > > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several hours > > you > > > > run > > > > > > > across > > > > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full > resolution. > > > Not > > > > a > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... I > > > have > > > > > seen > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Jelly TReatment is not the same!! Staph tests for antigens are rediculous, blood cultures are biased towards ignoring staphs and calling them contaminants.-Staphs build resistance to the antimicrobial your using quicker than any other bacteria.Lyme may alway's be penicllin sensitive but all the people that grew it and worked on it never felt this important!!!!!Lida Mattman that everyone quotes from her books and her theories grew lyme played with lyme for half a century but never ever offered a glimpse of how to treat. I think with your son coming back negative is the biggest load of crap testing I have ever heard. When you hve pericarditis you culture the peri-tonial fluid but most doctors are too lazy to do this.When you culture the peritonial fluid you then have your garden variety everyday hospital grade INFECTIOUS ORGANISMS and not bothering and wasting your life chasing the proverbial dead duck diagnosis. tony -- In infections , " jellybelly92008 " <herranenb@h...> wrote: > How do you specifically get tested for staph? Other then a blood > test? My doctor does that and has tested some of us for staph. My > son came back negative. Is it like some of the other pathogens, > stealth like? Can we count on that test being accurate? > > Then what is staph, isn't it a bacteria? It grew a vegetation on my > dad's heart valve. Treatment is again ABX, isn't it? I believe we > are only scratching the surface of the various pathogens resposnible > for making us sick. I actually have a little personal theory. > Accumulation of pathognes over the years are what cause us to > eventually break down and age. So many of us seem to be aging way > before our time. Treating pathogens may be the the > proverbial, " Fountain of Youth " . > > My dad was 67 when he died, he looked to be 90. By the way, my > family is the poster family for Lyme too. I am ALWAYS open to > looking at new angles. Years ago, my dad had a bout with a majorly > swollen knee. He was told it was staph, even though they never > tested it. I have recently learned that Lyme can manifest in exactly > the same way. Lyme likes to swim in the synovial fluids. Six of one, > half dozen of another. They are both donuts/pathogens. Treatment is > pretty close to the same. > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures > should > > > > > always > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be > ongoing) > > of > > > > > less > > > > > > > than a > > > > > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the > last > > 6 > > > > > months > > > > > > > Ive > > > > > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several > hours > > > you > > > > > run > > > > > > > > across > > > > > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full > > resolution. > > > > Not > > > > > a > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one more... > I > > > > have > > > > > > seen > > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 > Jelly > TReatment is not the same!! Staph tests for antigens are rediculous, .... >you then have your garden variety everyday hospital grade INFECTIOUS ORGANISMS. I get it. I know that in me, staph and strepp are at the root of my evils. I just don't know what to do about it, still. We had to dig through some virus and chlamydia (a year to get the chlamydia) to get back to it, but back it seems to be and it also seems that this staph bug is what starts me on a year-long cycle of now predicatable infections. It's as if they are co-dependant between themselves. I know it prolly sounds whacko. Penny - you mentioned amoxicillian in a previous post as an inappropriate treatment for someone (can't remember 'zactly) I read that post wwith interest but I never figured out the WHY you thought it was a poor choice? Over the last year I have taken doxy, amoxy and I still keep cycling thru a whole extended family of bugs. It takes between 10 months and a year to complete a cycle of staph and strepp, then chlamydia, then yeasts, then parasites then back to staph and strepp. Getting the metals out really helped to un-cloud the symptomology. So really, all I can do is keep doin' what I am doing - trying to hammer the buggers on the head as they pop out of their respective holes. <<singing Li'l Bunny Foo-Foo Hopping Thru the Forest. Picking up all the field mice and BOPPing then on the head!>> I just don't have any ideas how to locate MD's who have a clue. Without endless funds, I can only imagine what kinds of testing could be had, assuming I could find someone to do it. So, what do you-all suggest? Ok, so we know what is probably wrong, and we know what probably needs to be done, but how do we go about doing it? Confused, *S* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 I'm wondering if you might insert references or data in lieu of the exclamation marks. So far I haven't seen any data to back up many of the points you are making... Some of what you say has the potential to be interesting, but that cliche line from Jerry Maguire still holds, " Show me the money. " > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures > > should > > > > > > always > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be > > ongoing) > > > of > > > > > > less > > > > > > > > than a > > > > > > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the > > last > > > 6 > > > > > > months > > > > > > > > Ive > > > > > > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several > > hours > > > > you > > > > > > run > > > > > > > > > across > > > > > > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full > > > resolution. > > > > > Not > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one > more... > > I > > > > > have > > > > > > > seen > > > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 I feel your pain, there Sue. when I realized that my " CFS " was really caused by an infection (due to improvement on abx), I couldn't get anybody to believe me. Except Tony. It was a slow, step by step process. I had to send swabs to the lab in Australia to have anything to show to support my theory. It came back with a number of toxic organisms, including the staph that the labs here would ignore (except Esoterix - Shoemaker's lab in Texas). Turns out the staph they cultured and grew was resistant to 12 of the 14 abx tested. That ain't everyday, garden variety staph. Same with pseudomonas. This is where the big frustration lies. Finding doctors who will consider the idea reasonable, --that we're actually suffering from treatable infections, not vague autoimmune or mental conditions. And who will then test us for organisms and try to find a corresponding infectious condition to treat. That's why I was keenly interested in lyme patients, because they have the same symptoms I and many others have, but they also have doctors pro-actively trying to treat them. So I started looking for various sources of my own infection. I'd already tested negative for lyme so tried to find other infectious illnesses that might explain why I was sick and responded so well to abx. I didn't have typical sinus symptoms (only migraines) so didn't consider that (mistakenly). I'd had an infected tooth once years ago after having a crown put on it, and I could still feel it slightly at times. At the time, I was being seen by an acupuncturist (who used to be an RN) so I asked her if she thought there was any chance this tooth could be feeding a chronic infection. Actually, she did. She'd had a dental infection that put her flat on her back for 9 years. She told me that if that was my problem, that acupuncture wasn't going to be able to fix it. She sent me to an orafacial pain and autonomic nervous system expert who she thought might help (I didn't have any significant pain, but did have autonomic dysfunction), and I ended up going down a very long road until finally realizing that not only is a good portion of my jaw loaded with infection, so are my sinuses. I then met a doctor, through a friend, who did the bone biopsies for me. He was totally sympathetic, because he also had been struggling with osteomyelitis of the jaw, and shortly after my biopsy results came back positive, he died of a seizure caused by his infection. So not only did I lose the connection to a wonderful man, I lost a doctor and an ally. Anyway, it's a hard situation to treat, because the organisms eat right through the sinus walls, burrow into the bones, and the miles and miles of dentin tubules (tiny passageways through jaw bone that don't exist in other bone) allows the organisms to spread quickly when disturbed. Normally, surgery is the answer in bone infection, but the guys who are good at it, orthopedic surgeons won't touch people's heads (although occasionally you'll find somebody who will at least advise on treatment). And oral surgeons, honestly, most don't have a clue, aren't interested in infection, and cause more damage than good, spreading the infection, not properly treating with abx, etc. So if you don't have the absolutely best situation, a surgeon who understands bone infection, and an i.d. doc who will prescribe the abx based on cultures, and hyperbaric oxygen, etc., the chances are kind of slim that surgery's going to help. Although, sometimes, removing an infected tooth or root canal can help. That's why I'm inspired by people like Tony, who got well without surgery (he did pull a few teeth), without i.v.s (except one round). He and Barb both used mainly oral abx and other complementary treatments and I feel that I've got to get myself pretty far down that road before ever having another surgery (unless I'm absolutely convinced of the doctor's competence). So the whole point is, if you can locate some kind of infectious illness that you fit the description of and can get a diagnosis for it, then you're finally on your way to getting some kind of treatment. It might not be 100% right, but at least you're no longer dealing with the stigma of CFS, which no one takes seriously. If you've got lyme, and can find another infectious dx, then you've got that much more information to help you guide your treatment, that many more docs who can be on your team, and on your side. If you look at that phage website, there are LOTS of infectious illnesses out there. If any of them seems similar to your situation, or if you think you perhaps have experienced dental trauma in the past or have root canals (a lot of people even believe that the removal of wisdom teeth is one source of festering infection), it can get you a foot in the door for treatment. It's still a battle, unless you get lucky and find a really smart doctor, or at least a really cooperative doctor. But you go in and you say, I have this nasty symptom (which fits said condition) and I want to be tested for...(said condition). If you're positive, you're on your way. If not, then you go in with another serious symtpom, until you get something treatable. Stick to one or two big symptoms at a time. Give them something to work from. Something they have to take seriously (not general fatigue, etc.). For example, the dx I got, chronic osteomyelitis (which probably many people will never know they also have) is taken very seriously, because it's considered life threatening. So that's how I got i.v. treatment, and insurance coverage etc. Unfortunately, months of i.v treatment gave me a pretty good remission, but didn't cure me. But I didn't have the best team, either. You've also got to be firm with the docs in what you want them to do. Somehow, we have to start directing our treatment approaches, because most docs know almost nothing about how difficult it is to rid us of these chronic infections. I.E, you don't want the " quick fix " (i.e. surgery) without any antibiotic back up. You want treatment based on good lab work, and monitored with good labwork. So it means that if you do get a dx, then you read as much as you can and talk to as many people as you can who've had the treatmetns that may be recommended to you, and make sure you cover all your bases. Failing all that, then you end up trying to make educated guesses about the most effective abx for you, based on how you respond. That's really hard, but I end up doing that a lot. Because when I'm on a good abx, I feel way better. And I have a very helpful doc who's willing to let me take the lead in my treatment, because so far, since meeting him, I have improved. I've also relapsed, but the majority of my symptoms, except fatigue, have greatly improved. I guess the hardest part is if you're suffering from fatigue, both mental and physical, and brain fog on top of it, it's really hard to be proactive in finding treatment. That's why I keep hanging around, harping on these things. When I first was dx'd I could barely make sense of anything I read. Actually, it's why I'm grateful to Tony, because even though I couldn't understand a word of what he was talking about, my doctors actually could (he's better on the phone :- ). And once I finally got some abx in me (Cipro) and my brain started working again, then I could start getting more proactive in my own treatment. I still struggle with the fatigue. When I'm fatigued (like the last 6 weeks) I can't even make the appointments, let alone think about how I'm going to talk to a doctor. This is why I'm so passionate that we need to get our doctors aware of how many chronic infection illnesses are really out there and how they are contributing to this growing epidemic of chronically ill people. They need to wake up so they can take care of us! I'm tired of taking care of my doctors!!! penny > > Jelly > > TReatment is not the same!! Staph tests for antigens are rediculous, > ... > >you then have your garden variety everyday hospital grade INFECTIOUS > ORGANISMS. > > I get it. I know that in me, staph and strepp are at the root of my > evils. I just don't know what to do about it, still. We had to dig > through some virus and chlamydia (a year to get the chlamydia) to get > back to it, but back it seems to be and it also seems that this staph > bug is what starts me on a year-long cycle of now predicatable > infections. It's as if they are co-dependant between themselves. I > know it prolly sounds whacko. > > Penny - you mentioned amoxicillian in a previous post as an > inappropriate treatment for someone (can't remember 'zactly) I read > that post wwith interest but I never figured out the WHY you thought > it was a poor choice? > > Over the last year I have taken doxy, amoxy and I still keep cycling > thru a whole extended family of bugs. It takes between 10 months and a > year to complete a cycle of staph and strepp, then chlamydia, then > yeasts, then parasites then back to staph and strepp. Getting the > metals out really helped to un-cloud the symptomology. > > So really, all I can do is keep doin' what I am doing - trying to > hammer the buggers on the head as they pop out of their respective > holes. > <<singing Li'l Bunny Foo-Foo Hopping Thru the Forest. Picking up all > the field mice and BOPPing then on the head!>> > > I just don't have any ideas how to locate MD's who have a clue. > Without endless funds, I can only imagine what kinds of testing could > be had, assuming I could find someone to do it. > > So, what do you-all suggest? > Ok, so we know what is probably wrong, and we know what probably needs > to be done, but how do we go about doing it? > Confused, > *S* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Hi penny, I always look for your posts because we share a lot of the same symptoms and experiences. I have had cysts on my joints for over 20 years. They were dx'd as osteo-arthritis but I think it is really osteo-mylitis. What kind of a Dr should I see to get a dx of that? I am Medicare-only. Where are you located that you sent samples to Australia? I agree, I need to find a way to get a straight Dr to look at me. I would not mention the CFS/FMS because they just throw up hands when *that* walks in the door. For me, chelating the metals out really opened the door to more accurate diagnosis because it removed the " clutter " of brain fog and depression, also because Mercury hides and covers-up what is really thriving in terms of bugs. I didn't really start to improve much until the metals came out, but now, abx seems to work and it never did, before. What was the thing about amoxicillian? I took it recently and it was like taking sugar. I think my bugs just morphed immediately as I have been so antibiotic resistant for so many years. Hard to say what is going on. Cheers, *S* > I feel your pain, there Sue. when I realized that my " CFS " was > really caused by an infection (due to improvement on abx), I > couldn't get anybody to believe me. Except Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2005 Report Share Posted May 20, 2005 Oh yeah, I'm sorry, I forgot to respond to the earlier amoxicillin question. I'm not saying it's a bad drug. Might work great for some people, if their bugs are sensitive to it. If so, that's great, because it's one of the earlier generation drugs, it's cheap, relatively few side effects, etc. It's just been mis-used a lot, and I'm pretty sure there are already a lot of amoxicillin resistant bugs floating around out there. And I was doubting that my friend, who almost died of a staph infection almost 50 years ago, and has been suffering with various symptoms ever since, who is also at risk for heart problems from dental bacteria, is going to be all that sensitive to 2 days treatment (which is what they sometimes do with dental work). I feel that he certainly shouldn't be given just any old abx w/o more investigation. I truly think it's a numbers game for a lot of these docs. They kind of make a half-donkey effort to cover themselves, and hope the patient's lucky and doesn't have a heart attack from the dental bugs. Plus, my friend's got an HMO, which of course means that first and foremost, the contract doctors do whatever they can to keep the costs of medical care down. Hmmm, regarding your cysts on the joints. I'd check out some of the osteonecrosis forums (where they talk a lot about hips, as well as other places). See if you can get leads on some good Infectious Disease specialists. You've really got to be like a detective to find a doc who'll help you. There are also doctors out there who will treat arthritis with abx. If you can find one who will do biopsies, and let the results guide your abx choices, I think you'll have a much better chance of getting somewhere. That's what I see anyway. I live in California. At the time, Tony was friends with the microbiologist at a lab there in Australia and he hand carried my nasal swabs over to them for the species i.d. and abx sensitivities. For a while the lab started taking specimens directly from American patients, but then I think that kind of fell apart because Customs started holding things up. I sent Tony a swab that he was going to check for me once, and it didn't show up for over 6 months! Of course, the bugs were still alive!!! penny > > I feel your pain, there Sue. when I realized that my " CFS " was > > really caused by an infection (due to improvement on abx), I > > couldn't get anybody to believe me. Except Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2005 Report Share Posted May 20, 2005 Tony, Sorry it took so long to get back to this. I answered all of your posts yesterday and they didn't show up on the board. Trying again today. If treatment is not the same and I am the poster child for staph then why am I doing so well with heparin and a few ABX? Is there a better way to test for staph that is more accurate? Were you positive? > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures > > should > > > > > > always > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be > > ongoing) > > > of > > > > > > less > > > > > > > > than a > > > > > > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the > > last > > > 6 > > > > > > months > > > > > > > > Ive > > > > > > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several > > hours > > > > you > > > > > > run > > > > > > > > > across > > > > > > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full > > > resolution. > > > > > Not > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one > more... > > I > > > > > have > > > > > > > seen > > > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2005 Report Share Posted May 20, 2005 Sinus swabs are alway's revealing staphs. It' would be impossable for you not to grow any unless your like me on absolute nuclear attack. Actully chaemo possbly targets these same cells so I can't say. tony > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Tony - resolution/remissions/cures > > > should > > > > > > > always > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > considered provisional. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Report of a resolution (meaning drugs may be > > > ongoing) > > > > of > > > > > > > less > > > > > > > > > than a > > > > > > > > > > > years duration isnt worth anything to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont do lymenet terribly much - meaning in the > > > last > > > > 6 > > > > > > > months > > > > > > > > > Ive > > > > > > > > > > > spent maybe 60h there, maybe less. After several > > > hours > > > > > you > > > > > > > run > > > > > > > > > > across > > > > > > > > > > > people dropping in reporting multi-year full > > > > resolution. > > > > > > Not > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > em, but neither is it a shock when I see one > > more... > > > I > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > seen > > > > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > > > > 8. And I know of a few others here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.