Guest guest Posted April 24, 2005 Report Share Posted April 24, 2005 This is harder to study than I thought. Organ recipients take immunosuppressives for life - that is a big complicating factor in studying their health, and no control group exists. Blood transfusion recipients are evidently extremely unhealthy on average, making it hard to assess whether they might have contracted an idiopathic inflammopathy via transfusion. PMID 14996196 (2004): " The only survival and mortality data on a general population of transfused patients in the United States is more than two decades old " , spurring this new study. " Overall annual mortality was 31 percent in Year 1 after transfusion, 14 percent in Year 2, and 10 percent in each of Years 3 through 5. " I can only think of one way to study the question. Look at young healthies recieving transfusion due to injuries such as car accident. Compare health over the next 10-30 years that with controls who were similarly healthy at the time of similar severe accidents but didnt quite need a transfusion. Oh, arent there also people with nothing wrong with them except they need to be infused with platelets all the time? There is no control group for these subjects but it still might be interesting. Obviously, tho, unless it one day becomes crystal clear that idiopathic inflammopathies are caused by microbes, any finding such a study might make would probably be considered erroneous/non-causal by many readers, unless the difference uncovered was very very large. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.