Guest guest Posted April 22, 2005 Report Share Posted April 22, 2005 <egroups1bp@y...> wrote in part: > > I would guess, from what I know know that this route is probably > the cause of alot of problems that go mis-diagnosed. I have been interested in this possibility too and intend to look into it, but I dont have a scrap of data or any clues yet. There must be something out there comparing the long-term health of recipients to that of non-recipient controls. Not only is it obviously a huge *possible* public health problem / improvement opportunity, but study of it could shed light on the general study of the idiopathic inflammations, which have odd epidemiologic charecteristics. For example, pretty high quality data show that incidence of Crohns went up in Minnesota, USA rising dramatically from extreme rarity during the period c 1940-1970 - after which it became stable. In Japan the advent and rise were much later, occuring mostly in the late 70s and 80s as I recall. No one seems to have any super-hot specific ideas about why (IMO), tho Westernization of diet and other lifestyle factors is a possible cause. Crohns is a pretty good disease to study this way because it has a fairly objective and consistent dx based on gut exam, tho I think different dx protocols/techs are used. Trying to study historical change in entities like CFS or ADD would be awfully difficult. Good luck controlling for changes in socio-cultural and socio-medical practices and perceptions - the uncertainties would be endless. Epidemiology can be a kinda slippery science to begin with even without getting into vaguer diagnoses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.