Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 Hi, all. As regular readers here know, I have been writing a lot about glutathione depletion in CFS, which I think is a significant part of the pathogenesis of CFS for many PWCs. In the light of this, there are a couple of papers in the literature (which I cited in my poster paper) that have been puzzling to me. They are the paper by s et al. (2000), which is reference 9 in my poster paper, and the paper by Fulle et al. (ref. 10 in my paper). (My paper can be found at http://www.cfsresearch.org/cfs/research/treatment/15.htm ) The paper by s et al. reported finding that CFS patients could be divided statistically into two distinct groups, one having significantly elevated erythrocyte (red blood cell) glutathione relative to a healthy control group, and the other having significantly lower values. The paper by Fulle et al. reported finding elevated total glutathione in muscle biopsy specimens from CFS patients relative to healthy controls. So what is going on with the patients who have elevated glutathione? Tim recently asked me about this, so I have given it some more thought. In the light of the recent results of el al. in autism, showing single nucleotide polymorphisms in three enzymes in autistic kids, including one of the glutathione S-transferases, I think I now understand what's going on in these elevated glutathione patients. If these patients have a single nucleotide polymorphism in one or more of the glutathione peroxidase enzymes or the glutathione S- transferase enzymes that slows the corresponding reactions down significantly, this would lower the demand for glutathione and might allow its concentrtion to rise, but the person's body would still not be able to make effective use of the glutathione, and the symptoms that resulted would be similar to (but perhaps not as many or as severe) as those that would result from across-the-board depletion of glutathione, since the latter would affect all the uses of glutathione, whereas the former would affect only those uses mediated by the affected enzyme (or enzymes). It would be very interesting to see what the single nucleotide polymorphism picture is for these enzymes that utilize glutathione, in this group of patients with elevated glutathione. I think that the Great Smokies Lab Genovations tests characterize some of these enzymes, but not all of them. Perhaps as time goes on and more tests become available, we will have a clearer picture. In the meantime, I continue to encourage people with CFS to obtain a test for glutathione. One advantage of the blood tests for red blood cell or plasma glutathione is that they measure glutathione directly, so they are able to tell if glutathione is high or low, relative to normal. I don't think that the lymphocyte glutathione function test can tell whether glutathione is low, or whether the enzymes using glutathione have low activity. So this might be an advantage of the direct tests. Rich Van Konynenburg, Ph.D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.