Guest guest Posted May 13, 2005 Report Share Posted May 13, 2005 Barb, I'm replying because I think this could be very important. I have not one but two chronic-active viral infections, and am certain that many others who have had high-dose ARB therapy recommended to them can say the same. This is a good opportunity to demonstrate the principles that guide me in evaluationg such information: No, it doesn't cause me to tell Penny or others who are happy with ARB treatment that they're making a misguided choice. Yes, I do regard this as CRITICAL information for anyone contemplating following their example. The priniciple being: we don't question how individual patients choose to relieve their suffering, but we insist on asking hard questions when someone's chosen remedy is being promoted as appropriate for others. Cheers, > > > > I know that previously I posted that Losartan kept the herpes simplex > virus lock in the cells.. and posted the reference... SEE REF #1 > And we all thought that was a good thing... > > Well know it looks like the BO meds are selevtive in how they handel > INF alpga, beta and gamma.. and these drugs can cause a LATENT virus > (depending on the type of virus) to come OUT of Latency and cause > disease and (death in the immunocompromised). ....SEE REF 2 > > SEE REF for: > Latency/Cytomeglovirus and INF gamma: > > http://mstp.wustl.edu/alumni/rachel_presti.html > > IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE IF YOU ARE TAKING HIGH DOSE ARBS or ACE > (and experiencing what you think are viral infections) you may want > to read these and make your own conclusions. > > Barb > > > > > Ref #1 ........................ > Life Sci. 1994;55(4):283-9. > Effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan on herpes > simplex virus-type 2 infection of cultured vero and cardiac neonatal > myocytes. > > Gardner PL, Mbuy GN, Knabb MT. > > Department of Biology, West Chester University, PA 19383. > > Previous studies indicate that captopril, an angiotensin II > converting enzyme inhibitor, attenuates cardiomyopathy in a murine > viral myocarditis model. Accordingly, we investigated the ability of > captopril as well as angiotensin II (AII) and losartan, a nonpeptide > AII receptor antagonist, to alter infection or replication of herpes > simplex virus- type 2 (HSV-2) in cultured cardiac and vero cells. > Neither captopril nor AII influenced the ability of HSV-2 to > replicate in either cell type. Losartan, however, caused a dose > dependent decrease in pfu ability on vero cells with an ED50 of 1.35 > mM. In cultured myocytes, losartan (400 microM) reduced significantly > %LDH released (54.9 +/- 7.5 vs 29.1 +/- 4.2 in infected controls) and > % pfu released (40.9 +/- 8.4 vs 14.8 +/- 3.8 in infected controls) > into the media. > > REF # 2 ......................................... > > J Virol. 2002 Sep;76(18):9060-8. > The antiviral response to gamma interferon. > > Costa-Pereira AP, TM, Strobl B, Watling D, Briscoe J, Kerr > IM. > > Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London WC2A 3PX, United > Kingdom. > > A role for alpha/beta interferon (IFN-alpha/beta) in the IFN-gamma > antiviral response has long been suggested. Accordingly, possible > roles for autocrine or double-stranded-RNA (dsRNA)-induced IFN- > alpha/beta in the IFN-gamma response were investigated. Use was made > of wild-type and a variety of mutant human fibrosarcoma cell lines, > including mutant U5A cells, which lack a functional IFN-alpha/beta > receptor and hence an IFN-alpha/beta response. IFN-gamma did not > induce detectable levels of IFN-alpha/beta in any of the cell lines, > nor was the IFN-gamma response per se dependent on autocrine IFN- > alpha/beta. On the other hand, a number of responses to dsRNA [poly > (I). poly©] and encephalomyocarditis virus were greatly enhanced by > IFN-gamma pretreatment (priming) of wild-type cells or of mutant > cells lacking an IFN-alpha/beta response; these include the primary > induction of dsRNA-inducible mRNAs, including IFN-beta mRNA, and, to > a lesser extent, the dsRNA-mediated activation of the p38 mitogen- > activated protein (MAP) kinase(s). IFN-gamma priming of mRNA > induction by dsRNA is dependent on JAK1 and shows biphasic kinetics, > with an initial rapid (<30-min) response being followed by a more > substantial effect on overnight incubation. The IFN-gamma-primed > dsRNA responses appear to be subject to modulation through the p38, > phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and ERK1/ERK2 MAP kinase pathways. It > can be concluded that despite efficient priming of IFN-beta > production, the IFN-alpha/beta pathways play no significant role in > the primary IFN-gamma antiviral response in these cell-virus systems. > The observed IFN-gamma priming of dsRNA responses, on the other hand, > will likely play a significant role in combating virus infection in > vivo. > > > > > > > Pharmaceuticals > The Virus That Took Down Tysabri > Herper, 03.02.05, 6:00 AM ET > http://www.forbes.com/business/healthcare/2005/03/02/cx_mh_0301jcviru s > .html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2005 Report Share Posted May 13, 2005 I don't see this as a big deal. High dose ARBs do not eliminate inf-g. They reduce high inflammatory levels down to near normal levels. Most immune system pathways are still open and inf-g production can still be stimulated from these other pathways. I saw nothing in the studies to indicate that high levels are healthy, or that decreasing to normal levels would increase viral infections. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 I appreciate your perspective on this Ken, and it's something I've been thinking about. I most definitely have found myself much more susceptible to the common cold virus (but no others) since Benicar therapy. Prior to that, I hadn't had a cold in 10 years, which is pretty strange in itself because Prior to THAT, before the CFS really took me down, I had a cold at least every other month. So what I've been wondering is if I'm unnecessarily worrying about the possibility of viral susceptibility having increased with the Benicar, or if perhaps my immune system is just working more like it would normally. So I've had two colds in the last year. That's still a lot better than I ever did before CFS. These are important issues, IMO, and should be researched in much more depth if ARBs are perhaps to become the future anti-inflammatories of choice. My guess right now is the ARB manufacturers are just scrambling to find out if they've got the same issues as the 2 inhibitors (which are all being pulled from the shelves due to heart risks). penny > I don't see this as a big deal. High dose ARBs do not eliminate inf- g. > They reduce high inflammatory levels down to near normal levels. Most > immune system pathways are still open and inf-g production can still > be stimulated from these other pathways. I saw nothing in the studies > to indicate that high levels are healthy, or that decreasing to normal > levels would increase viral infections. > > Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.