Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 Penny So I spent a little time looking over these two articles (bad form to cite articles before you actually read them, I know) and they are even more interesting than I thought they might be. The first paper can be downloaded free of charge and figure 1, along with its legend, summarizes things well. http://tinyurl.com/cwkt3 Briefly, many neurons remove from the synapse the very transmitters that they secrete into the synapse. Neurons that use glutamate as a neurotransmitter, however, do not appear to be responsible for clearing the synapse of this transmitter. Instead several other cells in the brain do this, primarily astrocytes. The astrocytes have a transporter embedded in their membranes that pump the glutamate into the astrocytes. It's been documented that inflammatory cytokines decrease the ability of astrocytes to carry out this function. This leads to an increase in extracellular glutamate which causes several problems. Toxicity, with cell death, is one of them. The above authors speculate about how the excess glutamate may cause the fatigue that is associated with a wide spectrum of diseases, as well as things like sensitivity to sound and light. Or so this is how my error-prone memory recorded things.... This paper: http://tinyurl.com/7722e shows that lactams can increase the expression of the transporter in astrocytes. This should increase the clearance of glutamate from the synapse and surrounding extracellular space, and thereby decrease the harmful consequences. They demonstrated this in a number of ways, including an in vivo mouse model of glutamate transport deficiency. The mice that received the lactam benefitted as measured by several parameters. But the benefits were seen early on. After that, the treated mice seemed to decline at roughly the same rate as the untreated, though for a while at least the initial benefits were maintained. That is, the mice seemed to benefit X amount over the initial time period but then declined at about the same rate as the untreated mice while keeping the X amount benefit. The authors state, however, that the strength gains were eventually lost, implying to me that eventually the treated mice performed no better on this test than the untreated mice (they didn't actually graph the data out far enough to see this loss; it was just stated in the text). This would be consistent with the loss of efficacy that you've experienced with Ceftin. (Abx resistance is also consistent). How long did you use ceftin before it started to lose its efficacy? How much were you taking? If ceftin makes you feel better due to increased glutamate transport, this in no way diminishes the role that bacteria may be playing. After all, it seems to be inflammatory cytokines that cause the transport problem. And Cipro, a completely unrelated antibiotic, worked wonders for you. If ceftin lost its efficacy for you due to Abx resistance, then I would expect that the bacterial population would've retained a certain fraction of resistant members (more than were present prior to your first use of ceftin) and that ceftin will lose its efficacy more quickly this time. Alternatively, I'd tend to think that if the effect is due to glutamate transport, that ceftin will work for you about as long as it did before. I'm not encouraged by this approach (as a glutamate transport modifier) as a long term therapy, due to its apparently transient benefits. I've used a wide variety of abx now, though only for 2 to 3 weeks at a time. My first encounter with Cipro gave me meningitis-like symptoms vastly out of proportion to my normal experience (presumably a herxheimer reaction). But since then, no antibiotic has had any noticeable effect on me, good or bad. So I plan on testing ceftin (or some other lactam that crosses the BBB) short-term. If it helps in, say, one week's time, I'd be hard-pressed to think this was due to its antibiotic properties. If it works, I might use it to get me through my flares (provoked mainly by dark, cloudy weather). What were all the benefits for you? Just relief of fatigue? Did it relieve pain at all? I think Sue posted on CFSExperimental that excess glutamate could cause pain. The first article above also cites an article suggesting this. Was your pain being controlled to such an extent by Benicar that you would not have noticed an improvement in pain, or do you have enough untreated pain that you could comment on any influence ceftin might have had? Matt > > Matt, this seems really important to me, and I think there's > something to it. Unfortunately, I don't know where to go with it > since I can see myself fitting both scenarios. > > All I can say for sure is that it's not that I relapse badly after > going OFF the lactams. I go off the lactams because I start > relapsing. The fatigue starts coming back and they no longer seem to > work, so I stop and start something else, or take a break. I'd > always thought it was because my bugs had built resistance to the > abx, but perhaps it's just my body adapting, getting around it as > you describe. Sometimes, I notice that if I wait 6 months or so, the > abx do seem to regain some effectiveness. > > But there are two important points to consider, supporting the > resistance scenario in my case. > > 1) There is some research that shows that resistant bacteria can > once again become susceptible to certain abx. > > 2) Testing shows that my bugs develop resistance easily. First time > my organisms were tested, they showed resistance to 12 of the 14 abx > they tested. > > Gotta go now, but this is very interesting. > > penny > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 Matt, I've followed these posts about Lactams and glutamate transport, and they amaze me. This is such fascinating stuff! At the end you mention a comment by Sue B. about glutamate and pain. My pain specialist informs me that in addition to the mu-opiod receptor there is another type of pain receptor that is triggered by glutamate, and that this corresponds to sharp, sudden pain. Regrettably, he was telling me this to explain his enthusiasm for methadone, which I really hope not ever to have to take. It blocks glutamate receptors in the brain as well as the peripheral nervous system, and in the brain this can increase pain, rather than relieve it. It also has a far uglier rap among chronic pain patients than it's enthusiastic backing by pain doctors would lead one to guess. I am going to try and get a better handle on the glutamate issues myself, both in relation to pain and the long list of neurological disorders where failure of glutamate transport appears to be a key factor. That antibiotics can have these effects is very striking to reflect on. You introduced me to a different set of effects related to mitochondria, which wound up helping me to grasp what people were talking about with mitochondrial disorders, just because your explanations were so darn lucid. I'm very grateful you make time to post here when you can. > > > > Matt, this seems really important to me, and I think there's > > something to it. Unfortunately, I don't know where to go with it > > since I can see myself fitting both scenarios. > > > > All I can say for sure is that it's not that I relapse badly after > > going OFF the lactams. I go off the lactams because I start > > relapsing. The fatigue starts coming back and they no longer > seem to > > work, so I stop and start something else, or take a break. I'd > > always thought it was because my bugs had built resistance to > the > > abx, but perhaps it's just my body adapting, getting around it as > > you describe. Sometimes, I notice that if I wait 6 months or so, > the > > abx do seem to regain some effectiveness. > > > > But there are two important points to consider, supporting the > > resistance scenario in my case. > > > > 1) There is some research that shows that resistant bacteria > can > > once again become susceptible to certain abx. > > > > 2) Testing shows that my bugs develop resistance easily. First > time > > my organisms were tested, they showed resistance to 12 of > the 14 abx > > they tested. > > > > Gotta go now, but this is very interesting. > > > > penny > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 " phagelod " <mpalmer@u...> wrote: >> How long did you use ceftin before it started to lose its efficacy? I'd say it worked really well for a couple of months? I can't recall exactly. I think I refilled the prescription at least twice. >>How much were you taking? 1,000 mg per day. I started feeling better (like the others that have worked) within 2 to 3 days. > What were all the benefits for you? Just relief of fatigue? Did it relieve pain at all? > Matt Well, hard to say as I was taking Benicar which was relieving the pain for me. But I think, based on past similar experiences, it's primarily the fatigue that lifts. Perhaps just a little of the pain, but mainly the fatigue. I've always said I could live with the pain if I could just have some energy. None of the abx I've taken have helped with the pain or worked on inflammation the way the Benicar has. For example, I continued to have migraines, neck & shoulder pain, anxiety, etc. until I started the Benicar. Unfortunately, the Benicar does nothing for the fatigue at all. And it's hard to say what the abx are doing when they don't lift the fatigue. I've usually stopped taking them once the fatigue comes back, because that's been my sign they're no longer working, but now I'm not so sure. I've continued taking zithromax, even though I have no idea if it's helping, as the fatigue has not lifted much at all with it. Since I added Ceftin around a week ago, the chest congestion started to go, and my energy has lifted slightly, but I'm still feeling pretty exhausted. This is one area where Tony's remarkable experience doesn't help me. He didn't have the kind of debilitating fatigue I do. He mainly had severe pain, the kind that sends you to the hospital and almost out of your head. Whenever an abx was working for him, it was relieving some of his pain. And of course, as we all know, Tony's entirely well now, thanks to his many varied approaches and determination to kill the bugs with whatever worked. penny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 " Schaafsma " <compucruz@y...> wrote: > >> My pain specialist informs me that in addition to the mu-opiod > receptor there is another type of pain receptor that is triggered by > glutamate, and that this corresponds to sharp, sudden pain. > Regrettably, he was telling me this to explain his enthusiasm for > methadone, which I really hope not ever to have to take. It blocks glutamate receptors in the brain as well as the peripheral nervous system, and in the brain this can increase pain, rather than relieve it. It also has a far uglier rap among chronic pain patients than it's enthusiastic backing by pain doctors would lead one to guess. > > Hi , I wonder if there's some similar mechanism to explain why narcotics will, 7 times out of 10, wire me up, rather than put me to sleep. Actually, they'll often knock me out for an hour or two, then I wake up and can't go back sleep. Usually I feel relaxed but can't sleep, but sometimes I actually feel wired and very antsy. These are from drugs that put other " normal " people right out. Of course, it's probably no surprise that we PWC, who, even though we are exhausted can't seem to sleep normally, would get wired on sleeping pills. :-) And of course, I still get to enjoy the next day sleeping pill hangover. I suppose this is why Benicar has been so miraculous for me. No drug hangover. Just pain and anxiety relief and better sleep. penny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 Matt, I take that back about pain. It's true for body pain, but one way I gauge whether an antibiotic seems to be working or not, is the reduction in jaw pain, where my infection is most active. If the pain is gone, I know something's working. When I'm off abx, or when the effects wear off, the pain starts coming back. This is often my signal that it's time for my next dose. penny > > What were all the benefits for you? Just relief of fatigue? Did > it relieve pain at all? > Matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 I prefer to apply Occam's razor (the simplest explanation is usually best) but with the tetracyclines (and perhaps the macrolides) there does seem to be this bizarre coincidence: they can reduce (somewhat) the inflammation that's being caused by bacteria, while also killing off the bacteria themselves. In so far as mitochondria are viewed as remnants of bacteria and that the rRNA of mitoribosomes (the protein synthesis inhibitors bind to rRNA, not ribosomal proteins) is more similar to bacterial rRNA than to cytoribosomal rRNA, I can accept this dual effect. Heck, I might even insist upon it. But my tolerance for bizarre coincidences is finite. So these folks show this non-antibiotic effect of lactam antibiotics--the lactams may blunt the harmful effects of inflammation-mediated increase in extracellular glutamate, while also killing off the bacteria that we know can cause the inflammation. Their data look good to me, and furthermore they were not one of these groups that sought ahead of time to explain the " anti-inflammatory " effects of antibiotics by sidestepping the causal role bacteria play in the inflammation. Instead they randomly screened 1,400 compounds and came up with the lactams. OK, so maybe this universe has offered up yet another bizarre coincidence that PWCs have to incorporate into to their increasingly complex models. But none of these alternative mechanisms of certain antibiotics excludes bacteria from playing a causal role. Indeed, the burden for explaining the inflammation remains unmet by these folks. I qouted from this article before: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/352/13/1376 Again, they said, " ...there are anecdotal claims that chronic fatigue syndromes respond to ceftriaxone (or other antibiotics) because the underlying problem is chronic Lyme disease. However, the study by Rothstein and colleagues1 indicates that ceftriaxone may exert important effects on the central nervous system that are independent of its role as an antibiotic. " " or other antibiotics " ? Notice, they didn't say " or other lactam antibiotics " . Are they suggesting that all classes of antibiotics can be expected to have " feel good " properties independent of the bacteriostatic/cidal ones? Can they, for example, offer a " feel good " mechanism for the fluoroquinolones that have produced such strong benefits for select PWCs? This newly discovered property of the lactams has the potential to shed some insights. It also has the potential to be used to suppress insights. There are a lot of lymies with a lot of experience with the lactam antibiotics. Hopefully they, and the LLMDs, will aggressively, and rapidly, investigate this issue and come to some conclusions about the extent to which lactams may, or may not, be helping by way of glutamate transport. I'd like to see the LLMDs get out in front on this and define the issue early on as an and/both one, before others can define it as an either/or one. > > > > What were all the benefits for you? Just relief of fatigue? > Did > > it relieve pain at all? > Matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 Hi I don't have any experience with lactams yet so I won't be able to contribute any reports for awhile. And, mercifully, pain is rarely one of my problems, so hopefully I'll never be in a position to comment from experience on that issue. Interesting about the " sharp, sudden " description of glutamate pain. That's the kind of nuance that can help us discover what's what. If some people report " lactams don't help my pain " and other say " lactams help my pain " , we might save a lot of time by asking up front about the nature of the pain being discussed. I'm also interested in your comment that the influence of glutamate depends on whether it is in the periphery or in the CNS. As I read it, it is the failure of astrocytes in the CNS to remove excess glutamate that is the source of the problem. I'm thinking there aren't any astrocytes in the PNS. So if some people report that lactams aggravate their pain, then this might be an explanation. Could also be another type of pseudo-herx. I think you are probably much more familiar with lyme patient testimony than I am. Are you aware of any bias of the lactams to produce herxheimer pain. Just a thought. The issues may turn out to be quite complex. Matt > > At the end you mention a comment by Sue B. about glutamate and pain. > My pain specialist informs me that in addition to the mu-opiod > receptor there is another type of pain receptor that is triggered by > glutamate, and that this corresponds to sharp, sudden pain. > > Regrettably, he was telling me this to explain his enthusiasm for > methadone, which I really hope not ever to have to take. It blocks > glutamate receptors in the brain as well as the peripheral nervous > system, and in the brain this can increase pain, rather than relieve > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2005 Report Share Posted April 23, 2005 Can you give the name of the NEJM article that is the source of this quote. I couldn't reach it from the link, but have access to hard copies from the med school library, and would like to see the article. Again, they said, " ...there are anecdotal claims that chronic fatigue syndromes respond to ceftriaxone (or other antibiotics) because the underlying problem is chronic Lyme disease. However, the study by Rothstein and colleagues1 indicates that ceftriaxone may exert important effects on the central nervous system that are independent of its role as an antibiotic. " Thank you. > I qouted from this article before: > > http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/352/13/1376 > > Again, they said, " ...there are anecdotal claims that chronic > fatigue syndromes respond to ceftriaxone (or other antibiotics) > because the underlying problem is chronic Lyme disease. > However, the study by Rothstein and colleagues1 indicates that > ceftriaxone may exert important effects on the central nervous > system that are independent of its role as an antibiotic. " > > " or other antibiotics " ? > > Notice, they didn't say " or other lactam antibiotics " . > > Are they suggesting that all classes of antibiotics can be > expected to have " feel good " properties independent of the > bacteriostatic/cidal ones? Can they, for example, offer a " feel > good " mechanism for the fluoroquinolones that have produced > such strong benefits for select PWCs? > > This newly discovered property of the lactams has the potential > to shed some insights. It also has the potential to be used to > suppress insights. There are a lot of lymies with a lot of > experience with the lactam antibiotics. Hopefully they, and the > LLMDs, will aggressively, and rapidly, investigate this issue and > come to some conclusions about the extent to which lactams > may, or may not, be helping by way of glutamate transport. I'd > like to see the LLMDs get out in front on this and define the issue > early on as an and/both one, before others can define it as an > either/or one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2005 Report Share Posted April 23, 2005 I actually wondered if that wasn't a freely available article, and if I should provide the PubMed citation. Brown RH Jr. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--a new role for old drugs. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1376-8. PMID: 15800236 http://tinyurl.com/cr6lu Matt > > Can you give the name of the NEJM article that is the source of this > quote. I couldn't reach it from the link, but have access to hard > copies from the med school library, and would like to see the article. > > Again, they said, " ...there are anecdotal claims that chronic > fatigue syndromes respond to ceftriaxone (or other antibiotics) > because the underlying problem is chronic Lyme disease. > However, the study by Rothstein and colleagues1 indicates that > ceftriaxone may exert important effects on the central nervous > system that are independent of its role as an antibiotic. " > > Thank you. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2005 Report Share Posted May 7, 2005 I have a question related to the discussion a couple of weeks ago about certain antibiotics functioning to transport glutamate out of the CNS, relieving neurotoxicity. Does anyone know of supplements or foods that stimulate glutamate receptors and re-uptake? Tempe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.