Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Barb Peck wrote: > Re Bowen & the videos: > IMO, if a very > large percentage of RBCs are infected with anything, the patient is > going to be very sick- and by sick I mean fever and high WBC. > Sometimes I see on Lymenet people talk about high WBcs- but now > often..mostly it's the reverse of me (low WBCs) Why necessarily a fever and leucocytosis? Certainly sustained or intermittant fever is the rule in malaria... Homers article on babs says fever is not a necessary charecteristic of babs, but then again many people with chronic babesiosis might have substantially lower infection mass compared to acute malaria (I'm not sure). Concurrent infections could also be a factor there. But anyway, those are both piroplasmoses... so what else can we compare to, to get a broader picture? I dont know any other intra-red-cell infections? I guess bacteremia (in the serum, not the cells) is usually/always(?) pretty febrile - is that a fact thats contributing to your assessment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.