Guest guest Posted February 7, 2006 Report Share Posted February 7, 2006 If you Google his name, you will see that he does have his detractors. His website should give you a fair idea of the type of marketing he does. There is nothing wrong with his self-styled " Royal Court " of exercises, but there is nothing special about them either. Anyone who played high school football or wrestled has done a wrestler's neck bridge. Hindu pushups used to be called dive bombers. Hindu squats could be found in a lot of old PE classes without any special name attached to them. From Atlas on there is always someone with an exercise program to sell. I suspect that the average former high school athlete could put together their own body weight circuit of exercises and do just as well as they will with whatever program is currently in vogue. However, the commercial tapes do assist in putting together a program and provide motivation which can be helpful. Nothing wrong with that, but it does come at a cost. Jon Haddan Irvine, CA --- xyrodon wrote: > Hi, > > I have heard of Matt Furey for some time now. I > have also seen his > Combat Conditioning videos and to be quite honest, > there isn't much > offered that many professional athletes have not > seen or used before. > Another thing, Matt Furey seems to be more of a > marketer and less of a > conditioning coach. The man who trained him, Karl > Gotch, even said > so. In a letter he wrote, referring to Matt as " Fat > man Furey " he > stated many things about Matt that many people > suspected him to be, an > aggressive marketer determined to empty your pockets > for his extremely > over priced products. Anyone care to share any > thoughts about whether > this is true or not? > > http://scientificwrestling.com/letter_from_karl.htm > > > Trevis Raghubir > Milton, Ontario Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 > aggressive marketer determined to empty your pockets for his extremely > over priced products. Some of the products get expensive, but $30 for a book (Combat Conditioning) isn't much. For people with competitive athletic background, it's probably basic, but for most, it's a sound, effective program. I use Combat Conditioning & Combat Stretching as the foundation of my conditioning program. lee Grasso Denton, TX, USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 --- lee Grasso wrote: > > aggressive marketer determined to empty your > pockets for his extremely > > over priced products. Personally I find that Matt Furey is an aggressive marketer and some of his books repeat what is found elsewhere. This is not to say that his books are not worthwhile. They are quite good. Combat Conditioning is definitely a good product. However, because of the hype, I dont know which of his other products are worth it and which are not. I am very distressed that I now see the same kind of marketing coming out of Kubik who now too is pushing a bodyweight line of books and video. This trend is most distressing. Seay Palo Alto, CA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 > Personally I find that Matt Furey is an aggressive marketer I think that goes with the territory of being self-employed (I'm also self-employed, not aggressive, but can appreciate the strategy). > However, because of the hype, I dont know which of his > other products are worth it and which are not. It probably depends a lot on level of knowledge / expertise. They're good for me, because I benefit from a personal trainer, but don't like gyms and routine. Matt's products give me the information I need to be effective, and the knowledge to remain independent. There may be others out there marketing similar programs. I haven't studied others, but this one works well for me. > This trend is most distressing. Why is it distressing? lee Grasso Denton, TX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2006 Report Share Posted February 10, 2006 Every professional, in every field, has a responsibility to monitor the ethics and practices of others in that field. In certain circumstances, not doing so is far worse than the unethical practicioners themselves. The situation with Matt Furey is this, he pushes a single-minded approach to fitness while applying much effort towards discrediting other methods. In itself, this violates several laws of training. To further worsen the situation, he uses hyped up advertising to market overpriced materials. No professional should allow this to continue without voicing an opinion openly. The credibility of all fitness professionals is at stake when people start buying services/products that are not worth the purchase price. If you doubt this, simply look into the liability trends and insurance requirement changes that result from incompetent trainers. And when credibility issues arise from word of mouth, we all take the hit together. To be fair, Furey's program has made some positive impacts. He makes several valid points. He does provide solid education at times. But his ethics are questionable at best. People around the world seek out methods of attaining fitness every day. Almost no one is exempt from guerilla marketing tactics. And his tactics are to discredit anything other than what he recommends. So new and experienced people, already weary of fads, gimmicks and junk, think they find something to put their faith behind. When you are trying to entice such a response, your principles and methods had better be air tight. His are not. Everyone has a right to earn a living but doing so by manipulating others is beyond wrong. Colorado Spings, USA --- mpaulreid wrote: > Dear Forum Members, > > Why are we, the forum, personally attacking another > professional who > is spreading the good word of health and fitness? > Why is it bad to > make money doing what you love? Why is it a bad > thing to earn a > living or earn a living in the health and fitness > field? So what if > Matt charges $15,000-25,000/day, good for him! > > We all make mistakes in life, after all that is how > one learns. > > Be Well, > Mike Reid > Gothenborg, Sweden > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2006 Report Share Posted February 10, 2006 I suggest that the opinion posted before that Mr. Furey may state his price and may or may not receive is likely true... That one may post a pencil for sale on line and state a required price of $50,000 US does not mean one will find a buyer at this price. (I do hope however somebody does buy it sooner or later, it will finance my lifting expenses for QUITE some time...) As for Mr. Furey's site or methods and the ability of List members to judge for their own selves.... Mel chose to discuss a great number of methods, his delight in " gurus " and their salesmanship was evident if you read the archives? That the limitation is in the self promotion or sheer selling that is well, List Spam. As a comparison - Might I add I don't agree with say, Chek - but I don't go around here screaming about his well, clear intent to make money on what I consider something that makes no sense? I merely don't buy his products or attend his seminars, nor do I promote his way of thinking. My own personal opinion is that yes, he charges an outrageous amount of money for his books, seminars and other things, and I have a very basic disagreement on much of the work he sells. If you look at the archives, Mel himself made comments to the effect that Mr. Chek divides his work into many books, sells them at big prices - whereas Mel put his into 1 large volume. Perhaps Mel should have divided his works like Supertraining into smaller books and made more money in retrospect....<grin>. Or charged for membership to this list? Or for many of the things he did for his friends? But my disagreement with Mr. Chek's teachings does not mean he does not have a big following, nor that he has no right to make a living using such methods as he does. I think you do the list a disservice by suggesting that this is not a thinking group of athletes and interested parties, and we are all able to read and decide for ourselves. If some choose to buy Mr. Furey's or Mr. Chek's or any other person's services or works for their use, that is their choice. That even such persons as Mr. Chek clearly employ a great deal of " salesmanship " is clear, and people choose to buy from Mr. Furey or Mr. Chek based on their own judgment as consumers? That Mel clearly UNDERSOLD himself is clear if you view him in comparison to the above examples is clear to me...that the amount of marketing and salesmanship employed do not necessarily tell us accurately what the worth of the information or coaching is. That there is a great deal of money made or charged in the name of health and fitness is a given. That there will be somebody to buy virtually anything and believe in it, that too is a given. The world of bodybuilding supplements and other dietary add-ons supports this theory nicely... that buyer beware is something to employ no matter what the subject is really, one should check out the trainer or the supplement before using them is common sense? I mean, personally I would not see the value in hiring Stacey Maloney or Huang Hubin for my use... <grin>. To each their own. If any person does not properly serve the requirements of being hired or the user feels they require a refund, or some sort of damage was done, then the rules of the marketplace apply and let justice be served. I think the person who wrote the message below should pursue a refund from Mr. Furey as that is his reasonable right... and if he does not receive such, then such legal means to do so, perhaps there is a group of such unhappy buyers out there, who can say? But then I rarely buy a book and I don't hire anyone to coach me either...perhaps I am not a true measure of the target audience. One style of lifting or coaching cannot serve all and that's why the marketplace, wide ranging as it is, continues to expand. With humor, The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA It was written: > Matt is not spreading the word of health and fitness. He's spreading one > thing: greedy SCAM artist. > Of all people from everywhere, especially the ones on this forum, > should be average athletes in the least. When some guy goes on making > videos and books charging people a ridiculous amount of money for it > and makes outrageous and untrue claims, they are insulting the world > of sport, the world of training. Charging outrageous prices for over > rated products equals a greedy scam artist. > I'm sure everybody on this forum would pay $15000 per day. As for me, > thanks but not thanks. I'd rather spend less than half of that per year > for Stacey Maloney or Huang Hubin (coach of the great Yang Wei). > By the way, Furey went to college, what did he study? Kinesiology or > Marketing?? If you know the answer, I'd sure like to know. > Matt can do what he wants, he just better not make outrageous untrue > claims for his products as they're NOT designed to help elite > athletes, they are just the average weekend warrior. I feel like I > could have put my money for better things in training than his > videos. At first, I was very excited to get them, that is until I > watched them. Nothing new for me, funny things is, I've been doing > many of those exercises for years. Sorry Matt Furey, you got nothing > on gymnasts. > > > Trevis Raghubir > Milton, Ontario Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2006 Report Share Posted February 10, 2006 --- Schaefer wrote: <<But my disagreement with Mr. Chek's teachings does not mean he does not have a big following, nor that he has no right to make a living using such methods as he does. I think you do the list a disservice by suggesting that this is not a thinking group of athletes and interested parties, and we are all able to read and decide for ourselves>> If Furey and the others have the RIGHT to hype their products, then we certainly have the RIGHT to inform each other here about this hype. It's good that we do. Whereas group members may be intelligent, we are all athletes who are very eager to improve our performance. As such we are susceptible in some cases to big claims. It's good that we are here to give each other a healthy spoon of scepticism vis a' vis those who would exploit the fitness public. But that's not all. People selling these products should be ethical. Being ethical and being legal are not the same. Obviously what such hucksters do is legal. But is it ethical? I am not always sure about that. For example, Matt Furey's books are not distributed via bookstores. People have no way of examining the product beforehand and have to rely on what he says about his products. It's not always reliable. One must question whether one of the reasons he does not distribute through bookstores is exaclty because his marketing would be less effective if the consumer could browse his material before purchasing. Seay Palo Alto, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2006 Report Share Posted February 10, 2006 I'm digging this. Gotch's letter about Furey is on a website selling Gotch DVD's. What make Gotch right and Furey wrong? Because Gotch said so? Please. Any cooborating evidence? Obviously, Combat Conditioning is Furey's attempt to appeal to a mainstream audience. So? What's you're opinion of " Buns of Steel " ? Furey's influence seems to be limited to his web site and a few posts in forums. As a former high school wrestler, grappling is fascinating. How is Furey viewed in the martial arts arena? Did he win the claimed championships? Has he coached others to championships? Or, gasp, is he just trying to sell stuff because he was once a champion? Skip Dallen Covina, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 In a message dated 2/11/2006 4:20:56 A.M. Central Standard Time, s.dallen@... writes: <<<I'm digging this. Gotch's letter about Furey is on a website selling Gotch DVD's. What make Gotch right and Furey wrong? Because Gotch said so? Please. Any cooborating evidence? Obviously, Combat Conditioning is Furey's attempt to appeal to a mainstream audience. So? What's you're opinion of " Buns of Steel " ? Furey's influence seems to be limited to his web site and a few posts in forums. As a former high school wrestler, grappling is fascinating. How is Furey viewed in the martial arts arena? Did he win the claimed championships? Has he coached others to championships? Or, gasp, is he just trying to sell stuff because he was once a champion?>>> ***I first heard of Matt Furey by reading ads in Black Belt Magazine and similar publications. Thought about getting his program, but the level of hype made me wary. At _www.MMA.tv_ (http://www.MMA.tv) , there is a forum for professional fighters, their trainers, and MMA fans called The Underground Forum. There are also forums at _www.sherdog.com_ (http://www.sherdog.com) , _www.fightsport.com_ (http://www.fightsport.com) , and a host of others catering to the same target market. Rather than giving you my (biased) opinion, I feel it would be far more productive for you to examine those forums for the opinions of professionals directly specializing in combat sports. They do not mince words when it comes to information on conditioning systems/products produced by Mr. Furey. kson, CST Minneapolis, MN USA _www.ClubbellTrainer.com_ (http://www.clubbelltrainer.com/) " Better Living Through Movement. " " Be good to yourself. If you don't take care of your body, where will you live? " - Kobi Yamada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.