Guest guest Posted April 11, 2005 Report Share Posted April 11, 2005 I recently read Steiners 1954 paper, in which he again used silver impregnations to locate spirochetes intracellularly and extracellularly at the periphery of fresh MS lesions in 4 patients. In this one he tells about experiments he made to rule out certain artifacts. Again, many more " fragments " were found than actual spirochetes, and Steiner considers the fragments to probably be inviable spirochetal degeneration products (actually that is very unlikely). It seems there are multiple animal transmission studies supporting the role of this spirochete, tho I have not examined them, and dont know if they were controlled, etc. My impetus for posting is the information at this site: http://home.earthlink.net/~webmedic4u/ms.html A paper reproduced there from J Med Hypothesis addresses the dying out of the line of spirochete investigations of Steiner and others (many others). If everything asserted in that paper is true, its a damn shame. This morning my mom walked 7 miles with some friends in a Walk for MS fundraiser, the bulk of the money from which will I guess go towards study of the mouse " model " , experimental autoimmune encephalitis. Replicating (and beyond) the work of these 20th-century investigators could easily be payed for by the MS society(ies), let alone the NIH. Doing so is an immediate imperative, unless someone can explain whats wrong with the work of these several early-20th-century groups. Smart patients outside (and inside) the money-allocating eschelon of the MS society(ies) need to read these papers and start clamoring for their moneys worth. The same page has a precis of a fascinating paper dealing with what is said to be the first ever histological charecterization of a new (day-old) MS lesion, which discovered apoptosis of myelin-producing cells and microglial activation in the *absence* of infiltrating leucocytes. Searching in data collections the authors were able to uncover a few records of similar lesions in very early MS, suggesting this may indeed the way all lesions evolve early on. Hopefully this result, which is dissonant with the autoimmune theory of MS (*so* often casually presented as fact even in learned literature), wont be ignored. I will be reporting on full text of this ASAP. Abstract at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/107629227/ABSTRACT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.