Guest guest Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 relatedly, " Association of hypo-responsive toll-like receptor 4 variants with risk of myocardial infarction " http://eurheartj.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/full/25/16/1447 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 > This idea does nothing to explain trends this centruy, such as the > fact that inflammatory bowel disease, for instance, has evidently > increased in incidence substantially in the US since 1940. Or does it? In sepsis, the optimal host strategy is to respond as aggressively as is possible without causing irreversible damage or death. In septic situations, mammals whose immune response immediately pushes into the red zone will have a large chance of victory, but a large chance of death from immune-mediated shock. On the other hand, mammals bearing a variant hypofunctional protein such as the Crohns NOD2 variant or perhaps a TLR4 variant face a smaller chance of abrupt death from drastic septic shock, but face a larger chance of failing to clear the infection and spiraling down into death several days or weeks later. The " red zone " approach would be better in some septic scenarios, and the conservative approach would be better in others. If the pathogen is not really that skillful but happened to get out of control due to circumstances, its much better for the mammal to combat it conservatively. In such a case it would be pointless to risk death with an extremely radical immune response. But on the other hand, if the pathogen is some sort of a total badass like the Black Plauge, then it is much better for the mammal to push into the red zone immediately, despite the risk of death, because the mammal's chances of ever clearing the black death are going down literally every 10 minutes. As I was speculating last night, the survival advantage bestowed by eg hypofunctional NOD2 alleles, in *some* septic situations, might cause them to be retained in the gene pool at low frequency. Enter penicillin, c. 1945. Now the chances of eventually clearing an acute infection approach 100% - penicillin will do the job in a few days. Now, when a human comes down with septic bacterial infection within reach of a doctor, a life-risking immune response is a *terrible* idea in *almost every* case; nothing is gained by a red zone immune response, because penicillin will soon eradicate the infection anyway. " Red zoners " have their survival somewhat improved by penicillin; on the other hand carriers of alleles like hypofunctional NOD2, who have a more conservative immune response to sepsis, now *almost always* survive. These alleles become more common. Also more common are humans carrying more than one such allele, and these are vulnerable to diseases like Crohns which IMO are likely to be simple chronic infections. Ergo, the incidence of Crohns increases severalfold. This account is very speculative. It predicts the existence of other immune system variant alleles which confer both suceptibility to ACIDs and insuceptibility to septic shock death. The Crohns NOD2 alleles are currently the only alleles in this category. It also predicts that the ACID epidemic will level off in rich countries, but that the increase curve will be delayed in countries where penicillin was not commonplace for some years after 1945. The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease has now leveled off in the US and is still growing in many poor countries; I dont know whether the advent of widespread penicillin was actually decades behind in those countries, compared to the US and Western Europe (where, I get the impression, the rapid adoption of the drug was catalyzed by its widespread use in getting sick soldiers back to the war). A major limitation of this theory is that the history may not quite fit the curve of the ACID epidemic. See for instance Fig 2 in http://gut.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/46/3/336 Other factors that could factor into the increased ACID incidence: - the rise of essentially new pathogens able to infect a fairly broad range of human immuno-phenotypes (lyme could fit this description?) - the " miracle " of corticosteroids, c. 1950, which probably frisked up the reproductive lives of ACID victims a little, thus perhaps increasing the distribution of various suceptibility alleles? - and theres the hygeine hypothesis - modern lifestyle/environmental factors, etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.