Guest guest Posted April 10, 2005 Report Share Posted April 10, 2005 I promised to report back on my son's ID doctor appointment, and I have been tardy in doing so. It's basically because I haven't drawn any final conclusions yet. I think the appointment went as well as expected, considering that the ID doctors in Halifax have maybe only ever seen a few cases of acute Lyme disease before, and have only recently seen one or two other people claiming chronic or late Lyme. (I do suspect there's more Lyme around here than what's recognized, just no awareness of it.) The subject of the CDC guidelines came up pretty quickly since our IGeneX Western Blot results are only positive as far as the IgM, not IgG, but we have had symptoms for years. Lyme doctors have no problem with that because to them the IgM signifies active disease. It confuses other doctors though, because it looks to them like we were just exposed. So of course I pointed out that the guidelines are only meant for reporting. Then he said that Western Blots aren't very accurate because of cross-reactive bands. So I pointed out that our Lyme pediatrician pointed out that my son has many of the Bb-specific bands positive. (Yes my son actually has a diagnosis, but it's not a Canadian diagnosis.) He wants to repeat the serology and I told him my concerns with the Canadian Western Blot test. For instance, they only test 3 IgM bands. (For another thing, they rarely report anybody as positive, but I have no proof of that, just what I hear.) So, this sounds bad so far, but he did listen to me and he is fairly personable, not pompous like some. Also, he had no problem admitting that he wasn't familiar with Dr. Fallon's studies at Columbia -- so he doesn't think he knows it all already. Another good sign was that he accepted the notebook of Lyme guidelines and studies I had carefully put together in case he was " too busy to have kept up with the Lyme literature. " Now, if only he reads it, we might actually get somewhere! Next my son is being sent to a neurologist and rheumatologist, and I have to see another ID doc because this one is pediatrics only. Darn, I hope the other one is okay. What they want to do is start all over and determine for themselves what's the matter with us. He's not promising that they'll come to the same conclusion. I've already seen oodles of doctors, so I'm not sure what starting over means for me. New useless tests? Well, all I can say is that at least we've finally got someone's attention. I was very clear that we need help and somebody needs to take some responsibility for us. For years I was ignored and shoved out of various offices and I'm not going to accept that this time. I'm afraid I've got my hopes up, and it could be a hard fall. But could it be possible that we might be able to access care here without bankrupting ourselves? Not that they have any experience treating people like us, but there is a Canadian Lyme doctor on the west coast with whom they could consult. Hope is a scary thing. - Kate D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.