Guest guest Posted March 9, 2005 Report Share Posted March 9, 2005 Barb, I’m on Fluconazole 200mg daily, Minocin 100mg BID and Placquenil 200mg daily. Patrice From: Barb Peck [mailto:egroups1bp@...] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:09 PM infections Subject: [infections] P. JAEP and ERIC: alkalizing agents & Fluconazole synergy and : Looks like the dose of fulconazole can be reduced when the PH is raised in the cell. This is the same theory as Sam Donta's Lyme therapy -using HCQ to alkalize the cell compartment so one of the tetracyclines can enter the cell compartment and kill the intra cellular pathogen. Anyone taken HCQ and fluconazole together?- what about Schardt's IOWA group-? Barb ______________________________________________________________ Pharm Res. 2004 Dec;21(12):2207-12. Related Articles, Links Prophylactic role of liposomized chloroquine against murine cryptococcosis less susceptible to fluconazole. Khan MA, Jabeen R, Mohammad O. Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India. alammasood1@r... PURPOSE: The prophylactic role of liposomized chloroquine (lip-CQ) has been assessed against less susceptible Cryptococcus neoformans infection in murine model. METHODS: In the current study, we investigated the antifungal activity of lip-CQ against C. neoformans in macrophages cell line (J 774) and murine model. Mice were pretreated with free as well as liposomized formulations of CQ at various doses. The anticryptococcal activity of fluconazole was compared in mice with or without CQ pretreatment. The efficacy of CQ prophylaxis was assessed by survival as well as colony forming units (cfu) in brain and lungs of treated mice. RESULTS: Fluconazole alone was not found significantly effective against C. neoformans in both in vitro and in vivo studies. However, the antifungal activity of fluconazole increases in chloroquine-pretreated mice. Lip-CQ was found to be more effective in comparison to the same dose of free chloroquine in reducing fungal burden from macrophages in vitro and lungs and brain of C. neoformans infected mice. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced prophylactic activity of lip-CQ seems due to rapid uptake of drug-containing liposomes by macrophages. The liposome-mediated accumulation of CQ in macrophages makes the environment unfavorable (alkaline) for the intracellular multiplication of C. neoformans. Moreover, the increased incidence of multi-drug resistance and diversity of pathogenic microorganisms inhibited or killed by CQ makes it the drug of choice for prophylactic therapy. _________________________________________________________________ J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Feb;55(2):223-8. Epub 2004 Dec 08. Related Articles, Links Enhanced anticryptococcal activity of chloroquine in phosphatidylserine-containing liposomes in a murine model. Khan MA, Jabeen R, Nasti TH, Mohammad O. Interdisciplinary Biotechnology Unit, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh-202002, India. OBJECTIVES: The anticryptococcal activity of chloroquine was assessed after incorporation in phosphatidylserine (PS)-containing negatively charged liposomes in a murine model. METHODS: In the present study, we investigated the antifungal activity of chloroquine entrapped in PS liposomes against Cryptococcus neoformans in the macrophage cell line J 774 and in a murine model. Mice were treated with free as well as liposomal formulations of chloroquine before and after challenging with C. neoformans infection. The anticryptococcal activity of chloroquine was also evaluated in combination with fluconazole in the treatment of systemic murine cryptococcosis. The efficacy of chloroquine treatment was assessed by continued survival as well as by colony forming units (cfu) in liver and brain of treated mice. RESULTS: Chloroquine entrapped in PS liposomes shows increased activity against C. neoformans infection both in in vitro and in vivo studies. Moreover, the antifungal activity of fluconazole increases when used in combination with liposomal chloroquine. Chloroquine in PS liposomes was found to be more effective in comparison with the same dose of free chloroquine or chloroquine entrapped in neutral liposomes. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced anticryptococcal activity of chloroquine in PS liposomes seems to be due to uptake of drug-containing PS liposomes by macrophages. It can be assumed that liposome-mediated delivery of chloroquine to macrophages results in an unfavourable (alkaline) environment for the growth of C. neoformans inside macrophages. PMID: 15590713 [PubMed - in process] PMID: 15648251 [PubMed - in process] _____________________________________________________________ And another full paper at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=14688042 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2005 Report Share Posted March 9, 2005 Barb, Citing PMID 2184505, Schardts paper says " in vitro investigations failed to reveal a direct antibacterial effect of fluconazole on Borrelia spp. " The (unknown) action of the drug on Bb is apparantly different from its action on fungi, so personally I would draw no conclusion regarding borrelia from experiments involving cryptococcus. As I understand the HCQ thing, its ability to raise the phagosomal or phagolysosomal pH restores the activity of drugs that are poorly active at low pH (???because at low pH they are mostly tied up in the form of some sort of less-bacterially-bioavailable salts???). But with borrelia we arent sure how the drug is working (assuming Schardts ref on the inactivity of fluconazole against borrelia in vitro is correct). It could be that fluc deprives borrelia of a human metabolite it needs - or, by inhibiting certain CYPs, causes the buildup of human metabolites toxic to borrelia. Alas, the data are all over the place, as so often in these studies, so they dont give much of a clue. Many of Schardts patients improved greatly in like 3 days, whereas is now reporting some people realizing great benefit only at 30 days. And Schardts paper makes no ref to herxing, whereas during my fluc herx many months ago (for 36h starting 36h into 17 days of fluc at 100 mg /d) I was in bed all day, almost too miserable to deal with heating up some canned soup and eating, and many times crabbier even than usual. > > and : > > Looks like the dose of fulconazole can be reduced when the PH is > raised in the cell. > > This is the same theory as Sam Donta's Lyme therapy -using HCQ to > alkalize the cell compartment so one of the tetracyclines can enter > the cell compartment and kill the intra cellular pathogen. > > Anyone taken HCQ and fluconazole together?- what about Schardt's > IOWA group-? > > > Barb > > [abstracts snipped] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.