Guest guest Posted March 25, 2005 Report Share Posted March 25, 2005 I used the word compelling for a reason. Nothin in research is for certain, till it's been replicated by others - and there just doesn't seem to be the interest here. That was my point. I don't have the paper right in front of me now, but I recall in the summary the authors mentioning the plaques were secondary to the spirochete infection. I know has the paper - if you have it, check the last page before the references.. Barb Mark wrote: There are clues that different pathogens could be involved in such diseases. However, it's still unclear whether they are the cause or a consequence of the neurodegeneration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.