Guest guest Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Pam posted: > Lyme disease: A Look Beyond Antibiotics > Dietrich K. Klinghardt, MD, PhD 1/7/05 I commented on this one when it was posted previously a few days ago. I would just add that the reference to the Marshall Protocol, and repitition of unsubstantiated claims about 1,25-D as though they were facts, tells me this is someone who does not always scrutinize carefully what he's pitching as important medical information. I'm not dismissing the whole article, but I would advise it be read with a large cannister of salt within arm's reach. There is a difference between being thorough and being gullible - a difference that is likely to involve large sums of money, time and grief. Maybe the MP thing is an atypical lapse, but I wouldn't bank on it. I think a lot of these guys will scrutinize something just enough to see if they're likely to embarass themselves by promoting it. As long as there's a veneer of credibility, they add it to the list of 'essential treatment components.' By the looks of this, any patient of this doctor who has the misfortune to have her 1,25-D tested on the wrong day in her menstrual cycle will wind up compelled to endure a year on the Marshall Protocol. Are we sure Klinghardt isn't everyone's favorite RN in drag? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 > > Pam posted: > > > Lyme disease: A Look Beyond Antibiotics > > Dietrich K. Klinghardt, MD, PhD 1/7/05 > Hi I didn't write about Klinghardt must have been somebody else though I have read the article. One thing I know about him and mercury poisoning is that he uses chlorella which by no way has been proved to move mercury out of the brain so therefore it is likely to be inefective for mercury chelation. As far as I know only 3 substances have been proved to cross the blood brain barrier with regard to mercury, DMSA, DMPS and alpha lipoic acid. Therefore if he is so wrong about mercury chelation he might well be wrong about a lot of other things he writes, I don't know. Pam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 Argh, no, it was P. Dalton who posted it. My blinking brain turned it into Pam. My apologies! > > > > Pam posted: > > > > > Lyme disease: A Look Beyond Antibiotics > > > Dietrich K. Klinghardt, MD, PhD 1/7/05 > > > > Hi > > I didn't write about Klinghardt must have been somebody else though > I have read the article. One thing I know about him and mercury > poisoning is that he uses chlorella which by no way has been proved > to move mercury out of the brain so therefore it is likely to be > inefective for mercury chelation. > > As far as I know only 3 substances have been proved to cross the > blood brain barrier with regard to mercury, DMSA, DMPS and alpha > lipoic acid. Therefore if he is so wrong about mercury chelation he > might well be wrong about a lot of other things he writes, I don't > know. > > Pam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.