Guest guest Posted March 6, 2005 Report Share Posted March 6, 2005 Janice: All peer reviewed articles published are only theory untill they are duplicated by (many) others, then slowly, may begenerally accepted into convention. The dot com site you and Mark are referring to is an internet trial, using an unproven (and off-label) therapy based on beleif. Whether it is an open ended therapy, or whether it's finite, remains to be seen. Safety is the LAST thing an internet site, or an off-label therapy can ensure.. The whole POINT of discussions on all these therapies, is what may cause harm, and what may be beneficial. You can't get there with a one sided diaolgue. Barb Janice wrote in part: So there was actually a very important point being made in what was said to you both for you own safety and for the safety of others. I don't think he was just coming down on you. I think he was genuinely concerned that someone who was too exhausted and brain fogged to think all of that out might chase down something that could do more harm than good. Hey, I know I'm very glad I've got my own personal watchdog at home. Without him, there are times that I would high tail it after something that sounded really plausible just because it provided hope and an opportunity. Janice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.