Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 Not following something here. Can understand dairy cows vs. grazing beef being more prone to BSE when organophosphate is used in barns for fly infestation. Don't understand how an even principally barned dairy cow would be more likely to contract BSE from radioactive metal downpour vs.a beef grazing outside in it. The dairy cow's diet possibly lacking an essential nutrient or disadvantaged due to grain feeding may give higher susceptibility even with less exposure. Does the grazing protect the beef even though they're more exposed? Anyone remember if it was dairy or beef in Canada's BSE? Proximity to nuclear plants, waste? IIRC, was all west coast. Could Chernobyll drift that far? Wanita From: " " <karenr@...> > Email from Mark Purdey, reposted with permission: > > CJD etc are basically caused by a rogue radioactive metal that sticks onto > a normal brain protein, called the prion protein, in place of its normal > copper co-partner. So this will happen in environments which are > intoxicated by radioactive metals and where copper deficiency is a problem. > If its humans or farmed livestock then exposure to specific types of > chemical insecticides - that chelate/lock up copper - will produce the > copper deficiency facet of the disease. The radioactive metals probably > come via the atmosphere or in the food that has been grown in the > contaminated areas. - like your BSE cow next to the Hanford nuclear metal > dump, and our BSE cows being showered in the 1986 chernobyll radioactive > metal downpour. > > So this prion protein looses its normal copper co partner ( that performs a > role in the conduction of electromagnetic energy around the brain - light > and sound ,etc. ) and is then susceptible to binding up with any rogue > metals - like strontium 90 - that may be present in the brain. The rogue > metal represents the infectious agent of this disease. eg it gets attached > to the prion protein in place of copper, so the protein misfolds and starts > to initiate a dysfunctional melt down whereever it travels in the brain. > This initiates chain reactions of free radical damage and CJD ensues. > > Other neurodegenerative diseases like alzheimers and parkinsons are much > the same , but involve different types of metals and different types of > proteins that get screwed up. There is no infectious agent as such. The > free radical chain reactions cause the actual degenerative lesions in the > brain, that is why antioxidants like selenium, copper, zinc, vit C and E, > are good protectors in moderation. > > Best, > > mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 In a message dated 12/30/03 12:29:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, heidis@... writes: > This doesn't relate to Mark Purdey, but to my original post > about whether the downer cow got into the food chain > or not. Guess what, they actually seem to have used > that downer cow (after taking a sample to test, so they > know it was sick) to make hamburger. > > Eeeesh. Whether or not mad cow is contagious, the > idea that they are happy to put cows too sick to walk > into the food supply just ain't right ... 130,000 downer cows were put into the American food supply last year, which is a very small percentage of the total-- 39,000,000-- but one seems too many to me. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 >Not following something here. Can understand dairy cows vs. grazing beef >being more prone to BSE when organophosphate is used in barns for fly >infestation. Don't understand how an even principally barned dairy cow would >be more likely to contract BSE from radioactive metal downpour vs.a beef >grazing outside in it. The dairy cow's diet possibly lacking an essential >nutrient or disadvantaged due to grain feeding may give higher >susceptibility even with less exposure. Does the grazing protect the beef >even though they're more exposed? Anyone remember if it was dairy or beef in >Canada's BSE? Proximity to nuclear plants, waste? IIRC, was all west coast. >Could Chernobyll drift that far? > >Wanita Mark Purdey's work seems to support several different mechanisms for BSE -- which may well be the case, it may arise something like cancer (which also arises from a rogue protein, this time a DNA protein). LOTS of things cause cancer, and the immune system is supposed to repress it. But once a cancer gets started, it can replicate itself. Ditto, lots of things may cause rogue prions. There are a lot of theories about what causes them in the first place, and pesticides and radioactive waste both would seem to be good suspects. Viruses might be suspect too (there is a virus that seems to trigger cervical cancer, for instance). It seems there is a low level of BSE-like disease in ALL mammals, however, and maybe there always has been. The theory is that BSE is started by a rogue protein prion and then the protein replicates itself. Mark seems to agree on this point, albeit his mechanism is a little different. The question is, can the protein jump from animal to animal, and THAT seems to be the point of contention. Researchers claim they can routinely give BSE to mice and other animals from infected beef, but others seem to disagree that it is contagious. The disparity here is interesting and I still haven't found an explanation. Now, the disparity in the FAT researchers has been explained pretty well, and I'm comfortable with it at this point. Haven't found any such explanation to reconcile the two sides of the prion debate. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 >Researchers claim they can routinely give BSE to mice >and other animals from infected beef, but others seem to disagree that it >is contagious. The disparity here is interesting and I still haven't found >an explanation. Heidi - I may not understand your point, but Mark did say the other day that researchers who inject infected materials directly into the nerve tissues (brain/spinal cord/etc) of healthy animals are able to spread the 'disease.' He has no contention with that. -Allan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 This doesn't relate to Mark Purdey, but to my original post about whether the downer cow got into the food chain or not. Guess what, they actually seem to have used that downer cow (after taking a sample to test, so they know it was sick) to make hamburger. Eeeesh. Whether or not mad cow is contagious, the idea that they are happy to put cows too sick to walk into the food supply just ain't right ... -- Heidi http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/30/national/30ASSE.html?hp --------------------- It seems almost inevitable that some part of the cow was eaten. It was killed on Dec. 9, and ground up with about 20 others to make a batch of 10,000 pounds of hamburger that was shipped to groceries in eight states and Guam, although 80 percent went to Oregon and Washington, the Agriculture Department says. The diseased cow was not found until Dec. 23, and a recall order was issued. Dr. Weber, a spokesman for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, said he thought that, like most ground beef, the batch would have been frozen for transit. He had heard that 20 percent was found in storage, he said. But he said of the rest: " I'd hazard a guess that some of it has been consumed. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 BTW in this article it also says that the " oral uptake " for mad cow isn't very good, which was why only 150 people or so got infected in England even though thousands of BSE infected cows were eaten -- the prions get digested (that's been my theory too, which is why I'm not avoiding beef, though I think I'm avoiding store bought burger). -- Heidi http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/30/national/30ASSE.html?hp --------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 Hi, I live in Alberta where the first BSE cow was found in North America. It was a beef cow. No nuclear plants anywhere near, none in western Canada, I don't know about the western USA. There is lots of oil and gas activity, agriculture and forestry here. We are a long ways from Russia too. : -) Background radiation should be " normal " levels I would think. Bruce P.S. what's IIRC? ----- Original Message ----- From: Wanita Sears Not following something here. Can understand dairy cows vs. grazing beef being more prone to BSE when organophosphate is used in barns for fly infestation. Don't understand how an even principally barned dairy cow would be more likely to contract BSE from radioactive metal downpour vs.a beef grazing outside in it. The dairy cow's diet possibly lacking an essential nutrient or disadvantaged due to grain feeding may give higher susceptibility even with less exposure. Does the grazing protect the beef even though they're more exposed? Anyone remember if it was dairy or beef in Canada's BSE? Proximity to nuclear plants, waste? IIRC, was all west coast. Could Chernobyll drift that far? Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 ----- Original Message ----- From: " jafa " <jafasum@...> > What is a prion protein actually? And how does it become contagious? Even cancer, which are mutated cells, aren't contagious. How does a malformed protein become contagious? As you may know, proteins consist of long chains of amino acids folded into specific forms. Furthermore, many proteins will not spontaneously fold into their correct forms, but require guidance from proteins known as " chaperone proteins. " A prion, according to the generally accepted theory, is a protein which is misfolded in such a way that it becomes infectious and causes other molecules of the same type of protein to misfold in the same way, possibly--and this is where my understanding gets a bit hazy--through interference with the chaperone proteins or by acting as a chaperone itself. The word " prion, " by the way, is derived from " PRoteinaceous Infectious -ON " (the latter being a suffix for units of things related to heredity). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 >>Researchers claim they can routinely give BSE to mice >>and other animals from infected beef, but others seem to disagree that it >>is contagious. The disparity here is interesting and I still haven't found >>an explanation. > >Heidi - I may not understand your point, but Mark did say the other >day that researchers who inject infected materials directly into the >nerve tissues (brain/spinal cord/etc) of healthy animals are able to >spread the 'disease.' He has no contention with that. -Allan The contentions I've been hearing are that it isn't contagious in animal feed. And there was the question of whether or not it is safe to eat BSE meat. One side seems to be saying it just isn't contagious orally ... but the researchers do seem to be able to make animals sick using oral feeding. The reason it is an issue is that if it IS contagious from food, then it is important to clean up the animal food supply. And perhaps the people food supply. However, the researchers are also saying that it isn't *very* contagious orally ... i.e. they feel they have proof animals can get it from eating, but the contagion rate is pretty low, because the prions get digested. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 Network news this AM said cow was born before 1997 when it became law that animal feed could not contain brain and spinal parts Was 6 1/2 years old so most exposure she got to possibly contaminated food was 6 months. If food contamination is the main cause or just what they're looking at then any cases should be " only " older dairy cows not beef that are usually raised from 2-4 years. If its orally transmitable is it also genetically to offspring? Wanita > The contentions I've been hearing are that it isn't > contagious in animal feed. Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 Thanks, Bruce. Kind of remembered it was beef unlike dairy in U.S.and U.K. IIIRC is if I remember correctly. :-) Was there only one case? Does Canada have any law against use of brain and spinal parts in feed? Wanita > Hi, I live in Alberta where the first BSE cow was found in North America. > It was a beef cow. No nuclear plants anywhere near, none in western Canada, I don't know about the western USA. > There is lots of oil and gas activity, agriculture and forestry here. > > We are a long ways from Russia too. : -) > Background radiation should be " normal " levels I would think. > > Bruce > > P.S. what's IIRC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 Wonder if hanging time is relaxed to keep meatcutters busy on cows that are going just into hamburger or hot dogs. Long enough to get the meat cold for cutting maybe. That would mean test results aren't back by the time its out into the food supply. Anyone have the Taubes NY Times article saved where he bought a beef for a rancher to raise and went to the processing plant? Looking for how many days in until he had meat back to get legal hanging time. Wanita > This doesn't relate to Mark Purdey, but to my original post > about whether the downer cow got into the food chain > or not. Guess what, they actually seem to have used > that downer cow (after taking a sample to test, so they > know it was sick) to make hamburger. > > Eeeesh. Whether or not mad cow is contagious, the > idea that they are happy to put cows too sick to walk > into the food supply just ain't right ... > > -- Heidi > > http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/30/national/30ASSE.html?hp > --------------------- > It seems almost inevitable that some part of the cow was eaten. It was killed on Dec. 9, and ground up with about 20 others to make a batch of 10,000 pounds of hamburger that was shipped to groceries in eight states and Guam, although 80 percent went to Oregon and Washington, the Agriculture Department says. > > The diseased cow was not found until Dec. 23, and a recall order was issued. > > Dr. Weber, a spokesman for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, said he thought that, like most ground beef, the batch would have been frozen for transit. He had heard that 20 percent was found in storage, he said. But he said of the rest: " I'd hazard a guess that some of it has been consumed. " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 Just heard on the news that the FDA has banned all " downer " cattle from the food chain. Not a bad thing at all. Judith Alta -----Original Message----- >>Researchers claim they can routinely give BSE to mice >>and other animals from infected beef, but others seem to disagree that it >>is contagious. The disparity here is interesting and I still haven't found >>an explanation. > >Heidi - I may not understand your point, but Mark did say the other >day that researchers who inject infected materials directly into the >nerve tissues (brain/spinal cord/etc) of healthy animals are able to >spread the 'disease.' He has no contention with that. -Allan The contentions I've been hearing are that it isn't contagious in animal feed. And there was the question of whether or not it is safe to eat BSE meat. One side seems to be saying it just isn't contagious orally ... but the researchers do seem to be able to make animals sick using oral feeding. The reason it is an issue is that if it IS contagious from food, then it is important to clean up the animal food supply. And perhaps the people food supply. However, the researchers are also saying that it isn't *very* contagious orally ... i.e. they feel they have proof animals can get it from eating, but the contagion rate is pretty low, because the prions get digested. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 Judith- That is good news, though there are plenty of very sick cows which will still make it into the food supply. >Just heard on the news that the FDA has banned all " downer " cattle from the >food chain. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 No doubt, . But it is a start. Judith Alta RE: Mark Purdey on Mad Cow Judith- That is good news, though there are plenty of very sick cows which will still make it into the food supply. >Just heard on the news that the FDA has banned all " downer " cattle from the >food chain. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 > Thanks, Bruce. Kind of remembered it was beef unlike dairy in U.S.and U.K. > IIIRC is if I remember correctly. :-) Was there only one case? Does Canada > have any law against use of brain and spinal parts in feed? Hello Wanita What does IIIRC stand for again? I don't quite understand. Yes, there was only one case in Canada . . . and it didn't even make it into the food chain . . . not even hamburger or hot dogs! Yes, there is a law against using brain and spinal parts in feed. Implementation date was around 1997. Gayle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 >Wonder if hanging time is relaxed to keep meatcutters busy on cows that are >going just into hamburger or hot dogs. Long enough to get the meat cold for >cutting maybe. That would mean test results aren't back by the time its out >into the food supply. Anyone have the Taubes NY Times article saved >where he bought a beef for a rancher to raise and went to the processing >plant? Looking for how many days in until he had meat back to get legal >hanging time. > >Wanita The NYTimes article I'm familiar with seems to be by Pollan, and you can see it here: http://www.mercola.com/2002/apr/17/cattle1.htm I didn't see a mention of miniumum hanging time though. Whenever I've heard it discussed, the only purpose is for tenderizing, and the cheaper meat typically isn't aged. However, if the cow is sick I'd expect the meat to be quarantined. Likely things go so fast in the average slaughterhouse ... -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2003 Report Share Posted December 30, 2003 Hi All.... It has been widley known for a very long time in cattle circles that Mc's has always been the end result for cows that were sick or slow or in very bad shape. But downers are not to be ground up, but there are downers and then there are downers, and the difference is who is looking when and where.. Tim Re: Mark Purdey on Mad Cow This doesn't relate to Mark Purdey, but to my original post about whether the downer cow got into the food chain or not. Guess what, they actually seem to have used that downer cow (after taking a sample to test, so they know it was sick) to make hamburger. Eeeesh. Whether or not mad cow is contagious, the idea that they are happy to put cows too sick to walk into the food supply just ain't right ... -- Heidi http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/30/national/30ASSE.html?hp --------------------- It seems almost inevitable that some part of the cow was eaten. It was killed on Dec. 9, and ground up with about 20 others to make a batch of 10,000 pounds of hamburger that was shipped to groceries in eight states and Guam, although 80 percent went to Oregon and Washington, the Agriculture Department says. The diseased cow was not found until Dec. 23, and a recall order was issued. Dr. Weber, a spokesman for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, said he thought that, like most ground beef, the batch would have been frozen for transit. He had heard that 20 percent was found in storage, he said. But he said of the rest: " I'd hazard a guess that some of it has been consumed. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 In a message dated 1/2/04 12:11:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, toyotaokiec@... writes: > Doesn't the body break proteins apart, then reassemble them into the > proteins it needs? Not always. In part, because of digestive deficiencies. The body also incorporates undenatured proteins intentionally when they can be of use. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 In a message dated 1/2/04 3:01:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, bberg@... writes: > By the way, no serious researcher is claiming that anyone who eats meat > containing BSE prions will always get nvCJD. In the British outbreak, > there were millions of people potentially exposed to meat from infected > cows, and fewer than 150 people died. The general consensus seems to be > that the vast majority of people who consume BSE prions will not develop > nvCJD. , So what is your opinion on Mark Purdy's research? And what is your estimation of the reason(s) it seems the mainstream is ignoring it? Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 ----- Original Message ----- From: " " <toyotaokiec@...> > A couple of years ago when I first started reading about BSE, I got > the idea that the prion proteins are " contagious " primarily because > of their shape. Their shape influences neighboring proteins to also > become deformed. There are probably other factors involved > (nutritional deficiencies/excesses, etc.), but those other factors > only influence how rapidly the neighboring proteins become malformed > also. > > That said, I have trouble believing that simply eating food > containing prions can always cause BSE in the consuming animal/person. > > Doesn't the body break proteins apart, then reassemble them into the > proteins it needs? The body breaks most proteins down, but not all. If all proteins were broken down in the stomach, then bacterial and viral food poisoning would be impossible, as would gluten issues. Some proteins are just harder to break down than others. Particularly if someone has a problem with producing insufficient stomach acid and protease enzymes and leaky gut syndrome, it's entirely conceivable that the prions could be absorbed into the bloodstream. How they make it through the blood-brain barrier, I don't know, but then, I don't know much about the BBB. By the way, no serious researcher is claiming that anyone who eats meat containing BSE prions will always get nvCJD. In the British outbreak, there were millions of people potentially exposed to meat from infected cows, and fewer than 150 people died. The general consensus seems to be that the vast majority of people who consume BSE prions will not develop nvCJD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Bee " <beewilder@...> > You are right on. Also, consider that chemtrails have been dropped > in many areas in Canada and the US without the public's knowledge or > okay. Many of the chemtrails are done to experiment on people, > without their knowledge, others are to control pests or foliage > problems, others are possibly bioweapons of choice to control over > population. A lot to think about eh? Uh huh. And what evidence has led you to this conclusion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 In a message dated 1/2/04 7:20:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, jopollack2001@... writes: > From what I understand, the rate of human CJD > infection in the UK has not risen above the > international average rate, ever, despite the increase > in BSE in cows. I'm afraid I don't have a source for > this, but the person I heard it from is a source I > trust and who is well read/researched in these things. That doesn't seem relevant to me. The question should be whether there has been an increase *in Britain* of CJD that corresponds to the increase in BSE with any proportionality. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 , My thoughts exactly. I, too, put much more stock in Mark Purdy's theories and findings than I do in anyone else's claims. Judith Alta -----Original Message----- A couple of years ago when I first started reading about BSE, I got the idea that the prion proteins are " contagious " primarily because of their shape. Their shape influences neighboring proteins to also become deformed. There are probably other factors involved (nutritional deficiencies/excesses, etc.), but those other factors only influence how rapidly the neighboring proteins become malformed also. That said, I have trouble believing that simply eating food containing prions can always cause BSE in the consuming animal/person. Doesn't the body break proteins apart, then reassemble them into the proteins it needs? I place a lot of credence in Mark's hypothesis. He has found a pattern of BSE-like illness among many different animals/people located in many different locations in the world, with these 3 factors in common: 1. Dietary mineral deficiencies/excesses (e.g., too little copper along with too much manganese, or too much silver). 2. Above-normal environmental stressors (e.g., more UV light than normal, more sound pollution--like sonic booms--than normal, etc.). 3. The presence of organophosphate pesticides, many times in quantities greater than recommended for normal use. For the past 2 years or so, I have been wondering where the first American Mad Cow would be found. When it was said to have been found in Washington state, I was puzzled. But when I found that the locale also contained many orchards (non-organic, I would assume, since Washington is such a big producer of apples and other fruit), then I figured that there is probably a lot of pesticides/fungicide use up there. I saw an article recently that told about a lady whose son was born without eyes, simply because she had walked past an orchard while she was 7 weeks pregnant. The chemical Benlate was implicated. I think she got $7 million. It's probably a wonder that they haven't ID'd a Mad Cow up there before. Actually, one article I read said that the cow was classified as a " downer " because she had had trouble calving. I have heard of such things. Sometimes calving can damage the cow's nerves and prevent her from being able to stand after giving birth. If you value the cow, you can suspend her in a " cow hospital " and get her back on her feet while the damage heals. If you don't value her, you can send her to the slaughterhouse. Since the use of organophosphate pesticides on cows is so prevalent, it's my thinking that more cows have prions than we know. But if they remain asymptomatic until slaughter, then who would ever know? Since most beef cattle are raised to slaughter weight as quickly as possible, most will never make it to the 6-1/2 year age that the Washington Holstein was when she was slaughtered. It's my understanding that prions are not found in the meat or fat of cattle. I plan to continue eating the meat and fat of cattle. I get too much benefit from including beef in my diet, to consider eliminating it from my diet. I also plan to avoid exposure to organophosphate pesticides as much as possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 >That said, I have trouble believing that simply eating food >containing prions can always cause BSE in the consuming animal/person. > >Doesn't the body break proteins apart, then reassemble them into the >proteins it needs? Yes, and it is not easy to get BSE orally. It has been done, it seems, in the lab with animals, but usually the proteins are digested. There is some thought that if people are getting it, it may be from inhaled proteins or ones that get in through a scratch (much like you catch viruses -- viruses don't make it through the digestive tract well either). For instance, if you were cutting up a brain to eat and had a scratch on your hand. Only 150 people seem to have caught BSE in England, and thousands of infected cows were thought to have been eaten. It isn't very contagious by feed among cows either, according to the people who say it is contagious by feed ... only 3 out of 1000 cows got it. But the " feed " theory and Mark's theories aren't mutually exclusive at all -- environmental factors likely create the initial prions, whether or not they are contagious. Anyway, it's a good enough reason for me to pay attention to where my beef comes from. And a good reason not to use nerve agents on our pets ... I'm thinking those de-flea drops are similar to what they were using on the cows. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.