Guest guest Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 tom, as far as the enzymes in papaya go, my thought is that yes you will lose some (maybe all) of the enzymes, but will also partially breakdown some of the food through heat. i think that cooked and raw food both have benefit, and most people need a mix of the two--at least this was true of the groups price studied. therefore we don't have always to eat things raw (even fruit). personally, i eat avacado sauteed in coconut oil and love it, but when i eat it raw, i get gas. as for the walnuts, i don't know if heating will oxidize them--i am not so solid on the science there. but i always thought that it was really the high heat (300 or 400, or more) that caused oxidation, and if you basically dry things out at low temps (150 or so) the fats are still healthy. i can tell you that i make walnuts this way and they are amazing!!! they are so tender and delicate--they really melt in my mouth. my body tells me that this is a very healthy food. cric johnson - In , " Tom " <cassiusdio@g...> wrote: > Interesting! I was about to ask, I've heard that papaya seeds are > nutritious but how do you eat them? Papaya pepper is a good idea. > > However, the recipe in NT mentions that papaya is rich in enzymes. > Then it says to bake overnight at 150° to make the pepper. Does anyone > else see a problem here? I do. > > Similarly, the soaking and then " crisping " of walnuts strikes me as > illogical. Walnuts are supposedly very susceptible to rancidity and > should be refrigerated. Well, baking at 150° for hours seems like it's > going to oxidize the PUFA (Omega 3s especially) in the walnuts. But > then we're told to put them in the fridge after crisping to keep them > fresh...what the heck is up with that? > > Can anyone explain this? > > Tom > > > --- In , " Robin Stone " <robin@r...> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My name is Robin & I'm new to the list. Glad to be here! I love papaya > > best just as it is (peeled and seeds removed). It'll work best to cut > > the papaya in half lengthwise. Then remove the black round seeds from > > the middle; proposed a great idea with making " pepper " out of > > the seeds. Sally provides instructions on page 157 of NT. You can then > > either eat the papaya with a spoon (if it's not so large that you don't > > want an entire half at one time!), or slice it again lengthwise, take > > peel off with a paring knife, and cube it. Very nice served in a bowl > > this way. Also, I bet some pomegranate seeds on top would just be > > fantastic. -R > > > > Robin Stone, MS, RD > > Robin Stone Nutrition > > (828) 252-7408 > > robin@r... > > <http://www.robinstonenutrition.com> www.robinstonenutrition.com > > papaya? > > > > Does anyone know what to do with a papaya? I don't think I ever even saw > > > > one before. This is huge! I'm not even sure how to know if it's ripe, or > > > > how best to cut it.. > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 Why not just dry them at about 90-100 degrees? I do that after soaking and the nuts/seeds become light and crispy. Michele >From: " Tom " <cassiusdio@...> >Reply- > >Subject: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them? >Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 18:17:18 -0000 > >Interesting! I was about to ask, I've heard that papaya seeds are >nutritious but how do you eat them? Papaya pepper is a good idea. > >However, the recipe in NT mentions that papaya is rich in enzymes. >Then it says to bake overnight at 150° to make the pepper. Does anyone >else see a problem here? I do. > >Similarly, the soaking and then " crisping " of walnuts strikes me as >illogical. Walnuts are supposedly very susceptible to rancidity and >should be refrigerated. Well, baking at 150° for hours seems like it's >going to oxidize the PUFA (Omega 3s especially) in the walnuts. But >then we're told to put them in the fridge after crisping to keep them >fresh...what the heck is up with that? > >Can anyone explain this? > >Tom > > > > > Hello, > > > > My name is Robin & I'm new to the list. Glad to be here! I love papaya > > best just as it is (peeled and seeds removed). It'll work best to cut > > the papaya in half lengthwise. Then remove the black round seeds from > > the middle; proposed a great idea with making " pepper " out of > > the seeds. Sally provides instructions on page 157 of NT. You can then > > either eat the papaya with a spoon (if it's not so large that you don't > > want an entire half at one time!), or slice it again lengthwise, take > > peel off with a paring knife, and cube it. Very nice served in a bowl > > this way. Also, I bet some pomegranate seeds on top would just be > > fantastic. -R > > > > Robin Stone, MS, RD > > Robin Stone Nutrition > > (828) 252-7408 > > robin@r... > > <http://www.robinstonenutrition.com> www.robinstonenutrition.com > > papaya? > > > > Does anyone know what to do with a papaya? I don't think I ever even saw > > > > one before. This is huge! I'm not even sure how to know if it's ripe, or > > > > how best to cut it.. > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 Tom, when i made my pepper i just left em out on bench a day or 2 to dry. _____ From: Tom [mailto:cassiusdio@...] Sent: Monday, 15 December 2003 4:17 AM Subject: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them? Interesting! I was about to ask, I've heard that papaya seeds are nutritious but how do you eat them? Papaya pepper is a good idea. However, the recipe in NT mentions that papaya is rich in enzymes. Then it says to bake overnight at 150° to make the pepper. Does anyone else see a problem here? I do. Similarly, the soaking and then " crisping " of walnuts strikes me as illogical. Walnuts are supposedly very susceptible to rancidity and should be refrigerated. Well, baking at 150° for hours seems like it's going to oxidize the PUFA (Omega 3s especially) in the walnuts. But then we're told to put them in the fridge after crisping to keep them fresh...what the heck is up with that? Can anyone explain this? Tom > Hello, > > My name is Robin & I'm new to the list. Glad to be here! I love papaya > best just as it is (peeled and seeds removed). It'll work best to cut > the papaya in half lengthwise. Then remove the black round seeds from > the middle; proposed a great idea with making " pepper " out of > the seeds. Sally provides instructions on page 157 of NT. You can then > either eat the papaya with a spoon (if it's not so large that you don't > want an entire half at one time!), or slice it again lengthwise, take > peel off with a paring knife, and cube it. Very nice served in a bowl > this way. Also, I bet some pomegranate seeds on top would just be > fantastic. -R > > Robin Stone, MS, RD > Robin Stone Nutrition > (828) 252-7408 > robin@r... > <http://www.robinstonenutrition.com> www.robinstonenutrition.com > papaya? > > Does anyone know what to do with a papaya? I don't think I ever even saw > > one before. This is huge! I'm not even sure how to know if it's ripe, or > > how best to cut it.. > > - > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes. Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°, why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems to be an oversight on her part. My understanding of oxidation is, the higher the temp, the faster the process. Thus, if we're concerned that the oils in walnuts are so delicate that they need to be refrigerated (unlike other nuts, which are more stable), why would we bake the nuts overnight? In so doing we're likely quadrupling the rate of oxidation. Unlike enzymes, where 117-120° is the magical temperature, it's not like there's a threshold where suddenly oxidation happens. Oxidation happens at any temperature under normal conditions (presence of oxygen being one of them). There's a direct relationship between temperature and rate of oxidation. So it seems counterintuitive to bake your walnuts if we're so concerned about them that we take the trouble of refrigerating the nuts. Now, I'm pretty sure NT says that soaked nuts, like soaked grains, should be cooked after soaking to destroy some of the other antinutrients. Or wait, does that only apply to *sprouted* grains and nuts? I'll have to check. But I think the light baking of nuts does have a nutritional purpose; it's not just for taste. To clarify: my main point is, why refrigerate walnuts to slightly slow down the " ambient " oxidation (the slow rate of oxidation that occurs at room temp) when they're undergoing far greater oxidation in the oven? Tom > tom, > > as far as the enzymes in papaya go, my thought is that yes you will > lose some (maybe all) of the enzymes, but will also partially > breakdown some of the food through heat. > > i think that cooked and raw food both have benefit, and most people > need a mix of the two--at least this was true of the groups price > studied. > > therefore we don't have always to eat things raw (even fruit). > personally, i eat avacado sauteed in coconut oil and love it, but > when i eat it raw, i get gas. > > as for the walnuts, i don't know if heating will oxidize them--i am > not so solid on the science there. but i always thought that it was > really the high heat (300 or 400, or more) that caused oxidation, and > if you basically dry things out at low temps (150 or so) the fats are > still healthy. > > i can tell you that i make walnuts this way and they are amazing!!! > they are so tender and delicate--they really melt in my mouth. my > body tells me that this is a very healthy food. > > cric johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 Quoting lucientj <cassiusdio@...>: > Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my > food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a > very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes. > Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are > eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°, > why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems > to be an oversight on her part. First, I doubt it's true that all enzymes denature at 118 degrees. Second, the fact that the air in the oven is heated to 150 degrees does not necessarily mean that the seeds will be heated to that temperature. -- Berg bberg@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 I can't say for sure every enzyme, but in my Biology class we did experiments w/various enzymes and different factors that may affect them. All the ones we tested lost effect on their substrate(the compound they break down) at temperatures above normal body temps yet below boiling. I'll try to search through my stuff for the info. Heat destroys the enzymes shape, which features a " lock " , or active site, into which the " key " , or substrate, fits perfectly. Thats why each enzyme is substrate specific - it works on one type of compound, ie sucrase on sucrose. All proteins are denatured by heat and extreme salt or PH also. >From: Berg <bberg@...> >Reply- > >Subject: Re: Re: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them? >Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:22:06 -0800 > >Quoting lucientj <cassiusdio@...>: > > > Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my > > food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a > > very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes. > > Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are > > eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°, > > why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems > > to be an oversight on her part. > >First, I doubt it's true that all enzymes denature at 118 degrees. Second, >the fact that the air in the oven is heated to 150 degrees does not >necessarily mean that the seeds will be heated to that temperature. > >-- > Berg >bberg@... _________________________________________________________________ Winterize your home with tips from MSN House & Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 I'll have to look into the enzyme denaturing issue. Everything I've read thus far has implied that all enzymes are destroyed at around 118. If the seeds are in the oven overnight, as NT suggests, they are surely at oven temp all the way through, and probably for most of the night. I would think that after an hour or two they're already at 150, because 1. they're small unlike a thick roast of meat (the interior of which will never reach oven temp normally) and 2. 150 is not much above room temp so it takes much less time to get there. Tom > Quoting lucientj <cassiusdio@g...>: > > > Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my > > food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a > > very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes. > > Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are > > eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°, > > why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems > > to be an oversight on her part. > > First, I doubt it's true that all enzymes denature at 118 degrees. Second, > the fact that the air in the oven is heated to 150 degrees does not > necessarily mean that the seeds will be heated to that temperature. > > -- > Berg > bberg@c... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 Tom, this isn't necessarily true. I have dried hazelnuts in a 150 degree oven and even after they have been in there a couple hours I can stand there and eat them straight from the oven. If they were 150 degrees, I shouldn't be able to do that. I think Sally says somewhere if it burns your mouth it is above 118 degrees and also enzymes are being destroyed at that point. danny Creek Bend Dairy Farm Harry & Peggy Strite 11917 Snug Harbor Lane port, MD 21795 301-582-4135 cbdfarm@... If the seeds are in the oven overnight, as NT suggests, they are surely at oven temp all the way through, and probably for most of the night. I would think that after an hour or two they're already at 150, because 1. they're small unlike a thick roast of meat (the interior of which will never reach oven temp normally) and 2. 150 is not much above room temp so it takes much less time to get there. Tom --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 In a message dated 12/15/03 4:04:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, liberty@... writes: > >I'll have to look into the enzyme denaturing issue. Everything > >I've read thus far has implied that all enzymes are destroyed at > >around 118. > > I've always wondered about that too, because I make a > pudding that uses enzymes to convert starch to sugar > while it's cooking. Is the enzyme created in a lab? There's definitely enzymes that can withstand much higher heats, but I think they are uncommon in most life from regular climates. Microorganisms that live in very high heats have enzymes that have a much higher temp range, so there is nothing about an enzyme that makes it inherently denature at that magic number. I guess it probably depends on the chemical formation of the bridges that hold the shape together. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 --- In , " Tom " <cassiusdio@g...> wrote: > > I'll have to look into the enzyme denaturing issue. Everything > I've read thus far has implied that all enzymes are destroyed at > around 118. I've always wondered about that too, because I make a pudding that uses enzymes to convert starch to sugar while it's cooking. Whole wheat berries are sprouted and then ground, and a milky liquid strained off. That liquid is mixed with whole-wheat flour and water, and stirred and slowly cooked for almost a half an hour. During the cooking an enzyme from the sprouts converts starch in the flour to sugar, making the pudding sweet without adding any other kind of sugar. The pudding is definitely sweeter at the end of cooking than it is half way through, so it would seem that the enzymes are continuing to work throughout the prolonged cooking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 > > Is the enzyme created in a lab? There's definitely enzymes that > can withstand much higher heats, but I think they are uncommon in > most life from regular climates. No, it comes from the wheat sprouts that I described. That's why they're sprouted first. Maybe it's amylase or maltase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 I'm wondering if the sweet taste isn't from the sprouts themselves. If you've ever had manna bread, or wheat sprouts, you know what I'm talking about. Also, in the same lab, I watched the sugar content of potatoes and onions increase from cooking, so I would think this happens with most starches during cooking. The enzymes would remain active until the internal temperature became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds. Michele >From: " wtsdv " <liberty@...> >Reply- > >Subject: Re: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them? >Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:32:28 -0000 > > > > > > Is the enzyme created in a lab? There's definitely enzymes that > > can withstand much higher heats, but I think they are uncommon in > > most life from regular climates. > >No, it comes from the wheat sprouts that I described. That's >why they're sprouted first. Maybe it's amylase or maltase. > > > _________________________________________________________________ Wonder if the latest virus has gotten to your computer? Find out. Run the FREE McAfee online computer scan! http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 > > I'm wondering if the sweet taste isn't from the sprouts themselves. > If you've ever had manna bread, or wheat sprouts, you know what I'm > talking about. Yes, the liquid expressed from the sprouts is sweet, but the uncooked mixture of that liquid, the flour, and the water is in no way as sweet as it is after cooking. Also, the amount of sprouted-wheat catalyst is small in comparison to the amount of flour. > Also, in the same lab, I watched the sugar content of potatoes > and onions increase from cooking, so I would think this happens > with most starches during cooking. Yes, I can see where that would probably be so, but I've made potato soup that cooked for two hours and it never came out anywhere as sweet as the sprouted- wheat pudding. I also need to clarify that I didn't come up with the idea on my own. The dish has a long history and is made by a few different ethnic groups, all of whom claim that it creates its own sugar during cooking. > The enzymes would remain active until the internal temperature > became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds. Yes, that was my understanding as well. Maybe all the sugar is produced in the first few seconds of cooking before the enzymes denature, but then I wonder why the long cooking period is required. I make only small batches that take less than a half of an hour, but most people make large batches, calling for a few pounds of flour, and which take a few hours of cooking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 In a message dated 12/16/03 1:59:08 AM Eastern Standard Time, liberty@... writes: > >The enzymes would remain active until the internal temperature > >became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds. > > Yes, that was my understanding as well. Maybe all the > > sugar is produced in the first few seconds of cooking > before the enzymes denature, but then I wonder why the > long cooking period is required. I make only small > batches that take less than a half of an hour, but most > people make large batches, calling for a few pounds of > flour, and which take a few hours of cooking. Since hydrolytic enzymes don't actually do the hydrolyzing, water does, is it possible the reaction just speeds up with heat to a measurable level, especially when cooked in water? While enzymes might otherwise insure the molecules collide efficiently, it seems if you're boiling the pudding you're going to get at least *some* of those molecules, probably a significant number, colliding anyway. Isn't that what happens when you carmelize onions? Doesn't the carmelization proceed faster the more it is cooked, rather then slower, and isn't it quite clear most of the sugar is formed toward the latter end of cooking rather than the beginning? IOW, you can't sear onion or sautee them for five minutes and expect them to carmelize. As a relatively unimportant aside, my understanding is that denaturation refers primarily to the destruction of the tertiary structure, and maybe the secondary structure, of the protein, which would consist primarily of breaking disulfide bridges and some hydrogen bonds. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 In a message dated 12/16/03 12:51:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, liberty@... writes: > >As a relatively unimportant aside, my understanding is that > >denaturation refers primarily to the destruction of the tertiary > >structure, and maybe the secondary structure, of the protein, > >which would consist primarily of breaking disulfide bridges and > >some hydrogen bonds. > > So does that mean enzymes can still keep working after > being denatured, or not? No they can't. It doesn't have any practical importance at all, but was just an FYI. Peptide bonds bond the amino acids together, and are broken apart by hydrolysis, which has to be catalyzed by proteolytic enzymes to happen at a physiologically significant level. Disulfide bonds and I think hydrogen bonds are considerably weaker, especially hydrogen bonds, which aren't covalent bonds, and can break apart with heat and water. Enzymes and other proteins in a vacuum will not denature no matter how high they are heated, because all the heat does is speed up chemical reactions that break them apart, primarily with water or any other polar solvent that could have an affinity for the H or S. This denaturation destroys the effectiveness of an enzyme, which is wholly determined by its shape, but has no effect on the primary structure of the protein, which is the sequence of amino acids, which is why cooking wheat does not make it acceptable for gluten-intolerants. (The offending peptides are not broken). Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 Maybe the maltase withstands higher temperatures. I'm really curious now, and am going to look it up. I know the enzymes we studied - I think amylase was one of them, I have to check - decreased inactivity once above body temperature and were completely inactive by less than 200 degress F. Take care, Michele >From: " wtsdv " <liberty@...> >Reply- > >Subject: Re: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them? >Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:55:48 -0000 > > > > > > I'm wondering if the sweet taste isn't from the sprouts themselves. > > If you've ever had manna bread, or wheat sprouts, you know what I'm > > talking about. > >Yes, the liquid expressed from the sprouts is sweet, >but the uncooked mixture of that liquid, the flour, >and the water is in no way as sweet as it is after >cooking. Also, the amount of sprouted-wheat catalyst >is small in comparison to the amount of flour. > > > Also, in the same lab, I watched the sugar content of potatoes > > and onions increase from cooking, so I would think this happens > > with most starches during cooking. > >Yes, I can see where that would probably be so, but >I've made potato soup that cooked for two hours and >it never came out anywhere as sweet as the sprouted- >wheat pudding. > >I also need to clarify that I didn't come up with the >idea on my own. The dish has a long history and is >made by a few different ethnic groups, all of whom >claim that it creates its own sugar during cooking. > > > The enzymes would remain active until the internal temperature > > became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds. > >Yes, that was my understanding as well. Maybe all the >sugar is produced in the first few seconds of cooking >before the enzymes denature, but then I wonder why the >long cooking period is required. I make only small >batches that take less than a half of an hour, but most >people make large batches, calling for a few pounds of >flour, and which take a few hours of cooking. > > > _________________________________________________________________ Wonder if the latest virus has gotten to your computer? Find out. Run the FREE McAfee online computer scan! http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 > > Isn't that what happens when you carmelize onions? Doesn't the > carmelization proceed faster the more it is cooked, rather then > slower, and isn't it quite clear most of the sugar is formed > toward the latter end of cooking rather than the beginning? IOW, > you can't sear onion or sautee them for five minutes and expect > them to carmelize. Onions, even when raw, contain alot of their own sugar, and I don't think caramelization involves creating sugar. It's the conversion of sugar into something else - caramel. When onions are slowly cooked until dark brown and crisp, in other words, when they are _completely_ caramelized, they're much less sweet than when raw, and if I remember correctly, caramel coloring in a bottle isn't sweet at all. Although I could be wrong and maybe caramel is merely a form or state of sugar. Does anybody here know what, in exact chemical terms, caramelized sugar is? > As a relatively unimportant aside, my understanding is that > denaturation refers primarily to the destruction of the tertiary > structure, and maybe the secondary structure, of the protein, > which would consist primarily of breaking disulfide bridges and > some hydrogen bonds. So does that mean enzymes can still keep working after being denatured, or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 .. > >So does that mean enzymes can still keep working after >being denatured, or not? > > My textbook states: Higher temperatures denature the enzyme, altering its specific three-dimensional shape and destroying its function. The shape determines which chemical reaction the enzyme catalyzes. Like I wrote earlier, it is a lock and key structure; if you melt a lock, no way you are opening it with the key. take care michele _________________________________________________________________ Cell phone ‘switch’ rules are taking effect — find out more here. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 - According to the USDA, 100g of raw onions contains 10.11g of carbs, including a mere 4.28g of sugar, but if you make French Onion Soup the old-fashioned way -- cooking the onions in the stock for a long time -- the soup gets very sweet. >Onions, even when raw, contain alot of their own sugar, >and I don't think caramelization involves creating sugar. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 --- In , Idol <Idol@c...> wrote: > > According to the USDA, 100g of raw onions contains 10.11g of carbs, > including a mere 4.28g of sugar, but if you make French Onion Soup > the old-fashioned way -- cooking the onions in the stock for a long > time -- the soup gets very sweet. That doesn't really lend anything to the argument that caramelization increases sweetness, if that's what you intended. Because no caramelization is possible during boiling or simmering. Caramelization requires heat well above the boiling point. French onion soup involves frying the onions in fat before adding them to the stock, does it not? It's during that preliminary stage alone that any caramelization could possibly take place. Maybe though, you instead meant to lend to the argument that extended simmering breaks down starches into sugars, in which case that might be so. I don't really know. Although another explanation might be that the progressive break down of more and more onion cell walls during simmering releases progressively more and more sugar into the broth where it can be tasted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 - >Maybe though, you instead >meant to lend to the argument that extended simmering >breaks down starches into sugars, in which case that >might be so. I don't really know. That's what I meant, and it is so. >Although another >explanation might be that the progressive break down >of more and more onion cell walls during simmering >releases progressively more and more sugar into the >broth where it can be tasted. No, the figures I gave you from the USDA database are gleaned from combustion, so there are no phantom extra carbs (aside from ordinary sample and variety variation, of course). The simmering simply breaks down starch into sugar. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2003 Report Share Posted December 17, 2003 Different substances have different specific heat capacity. Water at 150 degrees would hurt your tongue, but something dry like nuts doesn't give off heat the same way. If you eat a bowl of soup that is steaming hot, fresh off the stove, the carrots will feel a lot hotter than the meat. It really doesn't take something as small as nut long to heat up, so I'm still looking for answers to my questions. Thanks for your idea, though. Tom > Tom, > this isn't necessarily true. I have dried hazelnuts in a 150 degree oven > and even after they have been in there a couple hours I can stand there and > eat them straight from the oven. If they were 150 degrees, I shouldn't be > able to do that. I think Sally says somewhere if it burns your mouth it is > above 118 degrees and also enzymes are being destroyed at that point. > danny > > Creek Bend Dairy Farm > Harry & Peggy Strite > 11917 Snug Harbor Lane > port, MD 21795 > 301-582-4135 > cbdfarm@i... > > > > If the seeds are in the oven overnight, as NT suggests, they are > surely at oven temp all the way through, and probably for most of the > night. I would think that after an hour or two they're already at 150, > because 1. they're small unlike a thick roast of meat (the interior of > which will never reach oven temp normally) and 2. 150 is not much > above room temp so it takes much less time to get there. > > Tom > > > --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2003 Report Share Posted December 17, 2003 So to get back to the original question, why was the assumption made that enzymes are breaking down the starches, or otherwise making more sugar? I think heat alone is responsible for breaking the starches down into sugars. So where did the idea that enzymes become *more* active at cooking temps come from? That seems illogical to me. Tom > > > > According to the USDA, 100g of raw onions contains 10.11g of carbs, > > including a mere 4.28g of sugar, but if you make French Onion Soup > > the old-fashioned way -- cooking the onions in the stock for a long > > time -- the soup gets very sweet. > > That doesn't really lend anything to the argument > that caramelization increases sweetness, if that's > what you intended. Because no caramelization is > possible during boiling or simmering. Caramelization > requires heat well above the boiling point. French > onion soup involves frying the onions in fat before > adding them to the stock, does it not? It's during > that preliminary stage alone that any caramelization > could possibly take place. Maybe though, you instead > meant to lend to the argument that extended simmering > breaks down starches into sugars, in which case that > might be so. I don't really know. Although another > explanation might be that the progressive break down > of more and more onion cell walls during simmering > releases progressively more and more sugar into the > broth where it can be tasted. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2003 Report Share Posted December 18, 2003 In a message dated 12/18/03 1:22:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, liberty@... writes: > >So where did the idea that enzymes become *more* active at > >cooking temps come from? That seems illogical to me. > > Well that was my whole point in commenting in the first > place. Since it seemed illogical to me that enzymes would > work _at all_, much less more actively once they reached > cooking temperature, given all that we're told. Guys, it would be thoroughly illogical to assume this *wouldn't* happen. The enzymes don't work at all once they are denatured, but of course they will work faster the hotter it gets *until* they get denatured. I agree it seems counter-intuitive in the sense that one would expect them to be denatured by that point. But if that assumption is wrong (after all, we don't know how long they take to be denatured, nor the temperature at which any given specific enzyme denatures) the logic that the enzyme activity would accelerate with heat is completely sound. What isn't so sound is that heat could break down *anything*. Heat is incapable of breaking down any substance into any other; the only thing it can do is speed up a chemical reaction. Water is what breaks down starches, and is also what denatures proteins, and is also what hydrolyzes proteins. Enzymes catalyze these reactions and heat accelerates them. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2003 Report Share Posted December 18, 2003 --- In , " Tom " <cassiusdio@g...> wrote: > > So to get back to the original question, why was the assumption > made that enzymes are breaking down the starches, or otherwise > making more sugar? Because it's repeated again and again in the sources, and by the Iranian community who make their own version of the pudding, called " samanu " . Also because sprouted wheat is required for it to work, and what else could come from the sprouted wheat that would make the pudding turn sweet, except starch digesting enzymes? > I think heat alone is responsible for breaking the starches down > into sugars. That's hard for me to believe though, because I've cooked starch based sauces and soups and never were any of them anywhere as sweet as samanu. > So where did the idea that enzymes become *more* active at > cooking temps come from? That seems illogical to me. Well that was my whole point in commenting in the first place. Since it seemed illogical to me that enzymes would work _at all_, much less more actively once they reached cooking temperature, given all that we're told. Hopefully somebody on the list will try making samanu for themselves one day, and then will be able to confirm what I say about it. Are there any Irani on the list? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.