Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

tom,

as far as the enzymes in papaya go, my thought is that yes you will

lose some (maybe all) of the enzymes, but will also partially

breakdown some of the food through heat.

i think that cooked and raw food both have benefit, and most people

need a mix of the two--at least this was true of the groups price

studied.

therefore we don't have always to eat things raw (even fruit).

personally, i eat avacado sauteed in coconut oil and love it, but

when i eat it raw, i get gas.

as for the walnuts, i don't know if heating will oxidize them--i am

not so solid on the science there. but i always thought that it was

really the high heat (300 or 400, or more) that caused oxidation, and

if you basically dry things out at low temps (150 or so) the fats are

still healthy.

i can tell you that i make walnuts this way and they are amazing!!!

they are so tender and delicate--they really melt in my mouth. my

body tells me that this is a very healthy food.

cric johnson

- In , " Tom " <cassiusdio@g...> wrote:

> Interesting! I was about to ask, I've heard that papaya seeds are

> nutritious but how do you eat them? Papaya pepper is a good idea.

>

> However, the recipe in NT mentions that papaya is rich in enzymes.

> Then it says to bake overnight at 150° to make the pepper. Does

anyone

> else see a problem here? I do.

>

> Similarly, the soaking and then " crisping " of walnuts strikes me as

> illogical. Walnuts are supposedly very susceptible to rancidity and

> should be refrigerated. Well, baking at 150° for hours seems like

it's

> going to oxidize the PUFA (Omega 3s especially) in the walnuts. But

> then we're told to put them in the fridge after crisping to keep

them

> fresh...what the heck is up with that?

>

> Can anyone explain this?

>

> Tom

>

>

> --- In , " Robin Stone " <robin@r...>

wrote:

> > Hello,

> >

> > My name is Robin & I'm new to the list. Glad to be here! I love

papaya

> > best just as it is (peeled and seeds removed). It'll work best

to cut

> > the papaya in half lengthwise. Then remove the black round seeds

from

> > the middle; proposed a great idea with making " pepper "

out of

> > the seeds. Sally provides instructions on page 157 of NT. You

can then

> > either eat the papaya with a spoon (if it's not so large that you

don't

> > want an entire half at one time!), or slice it again lengthwise,

take

> > peel off with a paring knife, and cube it. Very nice served in a

bowl

> > this way. Also, I bet some pomegranate seeds on top would just be

> > fantastic. -R

> >

> > Robin Stone, MS, RD

> > Robin Stone Nutrition

> > (828) 252-7408

> > robin@r...

> > <http://www.robinstonenutrition.com> www.robinstonenutrition.com

> > papaya?

> >

> > Does anyone know what to do with a papaya? I don't think I ever

even saw

> >

> > one before. This is huge! I'm not even sure how to know if it's

ripe, or

> >

> > how best to cut it..

> >

> > -

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just dry them at about 90-100 degrees? I do that after soaking and

the nuts/seeds become light and crispy.

Michele

>From: " Tom " <cassiusdio@...>

>Reply-

>

>Subject: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them?

>Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 18:17:18 -0000

>

>Interesting! I was about to ask, I've heard that papaya seeds are

>nutritious but how do you eat them? Papaya pepper is a good idea.

>

>However, the recipe in NT mentions that papaya is rich in enzymes.

>Then it says to bake overnight at 150° to make the pepper. Does anyone

>else see a problem here? I do.

>

>Similarly, the soaking and then " crisping " of walnuts strikes me as

>illogical. Walnuts are supposedly very susceptible to rancidity and

>should be refrigerated. Well, baking at 150° for hours seems like it's

>going to oxidize the PUFA (Omega 3s especially) in the walnuts. But

>then we're told to put them in the fridge after crisping to keep them

>fresh...what the heck is up with that?

>

>Can anyone explain this?

>

>Tom

>

>

>

> > Hello,

> >

> > My name is Robin & I'm new to the list. Glad to be here! I love papaya

> > best just as it is (peeled and seeds removed). It'll work best to cut

> > the papaya in half lengthwise. Then remove the black round seeds from

> > the middle; proposed a great idea with making " pepper " out of

> > the seeds. Sally provides instructions on page 157 of NT. You can then

> > either eat the papaya with a spoon (if it's not so large that you don't

> > want an entire half at one time!), or slice it again lengthwise, take

> > peel off with a paring knife, and cube it. Very nice served in a bowl

> > this way. Also, I bet some pomegranate seeds on top would just be

> > fantastic. -R

> >

> > Robin Stone, MS, RD

> > Robin Stone Nutrition

> > (828) 252-7408

> > robin@r...

> > <http://www.robinstonenutrition.com> www.robinstonenutrition.com

> > papaya?

> >

> > Does anyone know what to do with a papaya? I don't think I ever even saw

> >

> > one before. This is huge! I'm not even sure how to know if it's ripe, or

> >

> > how best to cut it..

> >

> > -

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom,

when i made my pepper i just left em out on bench a day or 2 to dry.

_____

From: Tom [mailto:cassiusdio@...]

Sent: Monday, 15 December 2003 4:17 AM

Subject: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them?

Interesting! I was about to ask, I've heard that papaya seeds are

nutritious but how do you eat them? Papaya pepper is a good idea.

However, the recipe in NT mentions that papaya is rich in enzymes.

Then it says to bake overnight at 150° to make the pepper. Does anyone

else see a problem here? I do.

Similarly, the soaking and then " crisping " of walnuts strikes me as

illogical. Walnuts are supposedly very susceptible to rancidity and

should be refrigerated. Well, baking at 150° for hours seems like it's

going to oxidize the PUFA (Omega 3s especially) in the walnuts. But

then we're told to put them in the fridge after crisping to keep them

fresh...what the heck is up with that?

Can anyone explain this?

Tom

> Hello,

>

> My name is Robin & I'm new to the list. Glad to be here! I love papaya

> best just as it is (peeled and seeds removed). It'll work best to cut

> the papaya in half lengthwise. Then remove the black round seeds from

> the middle; proposed a great idea with making " pepper " out of

> the seeds. Sally provides instructions on page 157 of NT. You can then

> either eat the papaya with a spoon (if it's not so large that you don't

> want an entire half at one time!), or slice it again lengthwise, take

> peel off with a paring knife, and cube it. Very nice served in a bowl

> this way. Also, I bet some pomegranate seeds on top would just be

> fantastic. -R

>

> Robin Stone, MS, RD

> Robin Stone Nutrition

> (828) 252-7408

> robin@r...

> <http://www.robinstonenutrition.com> www.robinstonenutrition.com

> papaya?

>

> Does anyone know what to do with a papaya? I don't think I ever even saw

>

> one before. This is huge! I'm not even sure how to know if it's ripe, or

>

> how best to cut it..

>

> -

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my

food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a

very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes.

Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are

eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°,

why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems

to be an oversight on her part.

My understanding of oxidation is, the higher the temp, the faster the

process. Thus, if we're concerned that the oils in walnuts are so

delicate that they need to be refrigerated (unlike other nuts, which

are more stable), why would we bake the nuts overnight? In so doing

we're likely quadrupling the rate of oxidation.

Unlike enzymes, where 117-120° is the magical temperature, it's not

like there's a threshold where suddenly oxidation happens. Oxidation

happens at any temperature under normal conditions (presence of oxygen

being one of them). There's a direct relationship between temperature

and rate of oxidation.

So it seems counterintuitive to bake your walnuts if we're so

concerned about them that we take the trouble of refrigerating the

nuts. Now, I'm pretty sure NT says that soaked nuts, like soaked

grains, should be cooked after soaking to destroy some of the other

antinutrients. Or wait, does that only apply to *sprouted* grains and

nuts? I'll have to check. But I think the light baking of nuts does

have a nutritional purpose; it's not just for taste.

To clarify: my main point is, why refrigerate walnuts to slightly slow

down the " ambient " oxidation (the slow rate of oxidation that occurs

at room temp) when they're undergoing far greater oxidation in the oven?

Tom

> tom,

>

> as far as the enzymes in papaya go, my thought is that yes you will

> lose some (maybe all) of the enzymes, but will also partially

> breakdown some of the food through heat.

>

> i think that cooked and raw food both have benefit, and most people

> need a mix of the two--at least this was true of the groups price

> studied.

>

> therefore we don't have always to eat things raw (even fruit).

> personally, i eat avacado sauteed in coconut oil and love it, but

> when i eat it raw, i get gas.

>

> as for the walnuts, i don't know if heating will oxidize them--i am

> not so solid on the science there. but i always thought that it was

> really the high heat (300 or 400, or more) that caused oxidation, and

> if you basically dry things out at low temps (150 or so) the fats are

> still healthy.

>

> i can tell you that i make walnuts this way and they are amazing!!!

> they are so tender and delicate--they really melt in my mouth. my

> body tells me that this is a very healthy food.

>

> cric johnson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quoting lucientj <cassiusdio@...>:

> Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my

> food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a

> very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes.

> Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are

> eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°,

> why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems

> to be an oversight on her part.

First, I doubt it's true that all enzymes denature at 118 degrees. Second,

the fact that the air in the oven is heated to 150 degrees does not

necessarily mean that the seeds will be heated to that temperature.

--

Berg

bberg@...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't say for sure every enzyme, but in my Biology class we did

experiments w/various enzymes and different factors that may affect them.

All the ones we tested lost effect on their substrate(the compound they

break down) at temperatures above normal body temps yet below boiling. I'll

try to search through my stuff for the info. Heat destroys the enzymes

shape, which features a " lock " , or active site, into which the " key " , or

substrate, fits perfectly. Thats why each enzyme is substrate specific - it

works on one type of compound, ie sucrase on sucrose. All proteins are

denatured by heat and extreme salt or PH also.

>From: Berg <bberg@...>

>Reply-

>

>Subject: Re: Re: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them?

>Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:22:06 -0800

>

>Quoting lucientj <cassiusdio@...>:

>

> > Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my

> > food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a

> > very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes.

> > Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are

> > eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°,

> > why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems

> > to be an oversight on her part.

>

>First, I doubt it's true that all enzymes denature at 118 degrees. Second,

>the fact that the air in the oven is heated to 150 degrees does not

>necessarily mean that the seeds will be heated to that temperature.

>

>--

> Berg

>bberg@...

_________________________________________________________________

Winterize your home with tips from MSN House & Home.

http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll have to look into the enzyme denaturing issue. Everything I've

read thus far has implied that all enzymes are destroyed at around 118.

If the seeds are in the oven overnight, as NT suggests, they are

surely at oven temp all the way through, and probably for most of the

night. I would think that after an hour or two they're already at 150,

because 1. they're small unlike a thick roast of meat (the interior of

which will never reach oven temp normally) and 2. 150 is not much

above room temp so it takes much less time to get there.

Tom

> Quoting lucientj <cassiusdio@g...>:

>

> > Thanks, Cric. Well, I'm no raw-foodist. I cook at least half of my

> > food. My point is, papaya seeds (which I've eaten raw; they have a

> > very sharp, unpleasant taste) are said to have lots of enzymes.

> > Because they don't taste great, the sole and express reason we are

> > eating them is for the enzymes. If all enzymes are destroyed at 118°,

> > why on earth would Sally recommend baking overnight at 150°? It seems

> > to be an oversight on her part.

>

> First, I doubt it's true that all enzymes denature at 118 degrees.

Second,

> the fact that the air in the oven is heated to 150 degrees does not

> necessarily mean that the seeds will be heated to that temperature.

>

> --

> Berg

> bberg@c...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom,

this isn't necessarily true. I have dried hazelnuts in a 150 degree oven

and even after they have been in there a couple hours I can stand there and

eat them straight from the oven. If they were 150 degrees, I shouldn't be

able to do that. I think Sally says somewhere if it burns your mouth it is

above 118 degrees and also enzymes are being destroyed at that point.

danny

Creek Bend Dairy Farm

Harry & Peggy Strite

11917 Snug Harbor Lane

port, MD 21795

301-582-4135

cbdfarm@...

If the seeds are in the oven overnight, as NT suggests, they are

surely at oven temp all the way through, and probably for most of the

night. I would think that after an hour or two they're already at 150,

because 1. they're small unlike a thick roast of meat (the interior of

which will never reach oven temp normally) and 2. 150 is not much

above room temp so it takes much less time to get there.

Tom

---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 12/15/03 4:04:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,

liberty@... writes:

> >I'll have to look into the enzyme denaturing issue. Everything

> >I've read thus far has implied that all enzymes are destroyed at

> >around 118.

>

> I've always wondered about that too, because I make a

> pudding that uses enzymes to convert starch to sugar

> while it's cooking.

Is the enzyme created in a lab? There's definitely enzymes that can

withstand much higher heats, but I think they are uncommon in most life from

regular

climates. Microorganisms that live in very high heats have enzymes that have a

much higher temp range, so there is nothing about an enzyme that makes it

inherently denature at that magic number. I guess it probably depends on the

chemical formation of the bridges that hold the shape together.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--- In , " Tom " <cassiusdio@g...>

wrote:

>

> I'll have to look into the enzyme denaturing issue. Everything

> I've read thus far has implied that all enzymes are destroyed at

> around 118.

I've always wondered about that too, because I make a

pudding that uses enzymes to convert starch to sugar

while it's cooking. Whole wheat berries are sprouted

and then ground, and a milky liquid strained off. That

liquid is mixed with whole-wheat flour and water, and

stirred and slowly cooked for almost a half an hour.

During the cooking an enzyme from the sprouts converts

starch in the flour to sugar, making the pudding sweet

without adding any other kind of sugar. The pudding

is definitely sweeter at the end of cooking than it is

half way through, so it would seem that the enzymes are

continuing to work throughout the prolonged cooking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> Is the enzyme created in a lab? There's definitely enzymes that

> can withstand much higher heats, but I think they are uncommon in

> most life from regular climates.

No, it comes from the wheat sprouts that I described. That's

why they're sprouted first. Maybe it's amylase or maltase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering if the sweet taste isn't from the sprouts themselves. If

you've ever had manna bread, or wheat sprouts, you know what I'm talking

about. Also, in the same lab, I watched the sugar content of potatoes and

onions increase from cooking, so I would think this happens with most

starches during cooking. The enzymes would remain active until the internal

temperature became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds.

Michele

>From: " wtsdv " <liberty@...>

>Reply-

>

>Subject: Re: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them?

>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:32:28 -0000

>

>

> >

> > Is the enzyme created in a lab? There's definitely enzymes that

> > can withstand much higher heats, but I think they are uncommon in

> > most life from regular climates.

>

>No, it comes from the wheat sprouts that I described. That's

>why they're sprouted first. Maybe it's amylase or maltase.

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

Wonder if the latest virus has gotten to your computer? Find out. Run the

FREE McAfee online computer scan!

http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> I'm wondering if the sweet taste isn't from the sprouts themselves.

> If you've ever had manna bread, or wheat sprouts, you know what I'm

> talking about.

Yes, the liquid expressed from the sprouts is sweet,

but the uncooked mixture of that liquid, the flour,

and the water is in no way as sweet as it is after

cooking. Also, the amount of sprouted-wheat catalyst

is small in comparison to the amount of flour.

> Also, in the same lab, I watched the sugar content of potatoes

> and onions increase from cooking, so I would think this happens

> with most starches during cooking.

Yes, I can see where that would probably be so, but

I've made potato soup that cooked for two hours and

it never came out anywhere as sweet as the sprouted-

wheat pudding.

I also need to clarify that I didn't come up with the

idea on my own. The dish has a long history and is

made by a few different ethnic groups, all of whom

claim that it creates its own sugar during cooking.

> The enzymes would remain active until the internal temperature

> became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds.

Yes, that was my understanding as well. Maybe all the

sugar is produced in the first few seconds of cooking

before the enzymes denature, but then I wonder why the

long cooking period is required. I make only small

batches that take less than a half of an hour, but most

people make large batches, calling for a few pounds of

flour, and which take a few hours of cooking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 12/16/03 1:59:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,

liberty@... writes:

> >The enzymes would remain active until the internal temperature

> >became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds.

>

> Yes, that was my understanding as well. Maybe all the

>

> sugar is produced in the first few seconds of cooking

> before the enzymes denature, but then I wonder why the

> long cooking period is required. I make only small

> batches that take less than a half of an hour, but most

> people make large batches, calling for a few pounds of

> flour, and which take a few hours of cooking.

Since hydrolytic enzymes don't actually do the hydrolyzing, water does, is it

possible the reaction just speeds up with heat to a measurable level,

especially when cooked in water? While enzymes might otherwise insure the

molecules

collide efficiently, it seems if you're boiling the pudding you're going to

get at least *some* of those molecules, probably a significant number, colliding

anyway.

Isn't that what happens when you carmelize onions? Doesn't the carmelization

proceed faster the more it is cooked, rather then slower, and isn't it quite

clear most of the sugar is formed toward the latter end of cooking rather than

the beginning? IOW, you can't sear onion or sautee them for five minutes and

expect them to carmelize.

As a relatively unimportant aside, my understanding is that denaturation

refers primarily to the destruction of the tertiary structure, and maybe the

secondary structure, of the protein, which would consist primarily of breaking

disulfide bridges and some hydrogen bonds.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 12/16/03 12:51:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,

liberty@... writes:

> >As a relatively unimportant aside, my understanding is that

> >denaturation refers primarily to the destruction of the tertiary

> >structure, and maybe the secondary structure, of the protein,

> >which would consist primarily of breaking disulfide bridges and

> >some hydrogen bonds.

>

> So does that mean enzymes can still keep working after

> being denatured, or not?

No they can't. It doesn't have any practical importance at all, but was just

an FYI. Peptide bonds bond the amino acids together, and are broken apart by

hydrolysis, which has to be catalyzed by proteolytic enzymes to happen at a

physiologically significant level. Disulfide bonds and I think hydrogen bonds

are considerably weaker, especially hydrogen bonds, which aren't covalent

bonds, and can break apart with heat and water. Enzymes and other proteins in a

vacuum will not denature no matter how high they are heated, because all the

heat does is speed up chemical reactions that break them apart, primarily with

water or any other polar solvent that could have an affinity for the H or S.

This denaturation destroys the effectiveness of an enzyme, which is wholly

determined by its shape, but has no effect on the primary structure of the

protein, which is the sequence of amino acids, which is why cooking wheat does

not

make it acceptable for gluten-intolerants. (The offending peptides are not

broken).

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the maltase withstands higher temperatures. I'm really curious now,

and am going to look it up. I know the enzymes we studied - I think amylase

was one of them, I have to check - decreased inactivity once above body

temperature and were completely inactive by less than 200 degress F.

Take care,

Michele

>From: " wtsdv " <liberty@...>

>Reply-

>

>Subject: Re: Papaya seeds? Walnuts? Cook them?

>Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:55:48 -0000

>

>

> >

> > I'm wondering if the sweet taste isn't from the sprouts themselves.

> > If you've ever had manna bread, or wheat sprouts, you know what I'm

> > talking about.

>

>Yes, the liquid expressed from the sprouts is sweet,

>but the uncooked mixture of that liquid, the flour,

>and the water is in no way as sweet as it is after

>cooking. Also, the amount of sprouted-wheat catalyst

>is small in comparison to the amount of flour.

>

> > Also, in the same lab, I watched the sugar content of potatoes

> > and onions increase from cooking, so I would think this happens

> > with most starches during cooking.

>

>Yes, I can see where that would probably be so, but

>I've made potato soup that cooked for two hours and

>it never came out anywhere as sweet as the sprouted-

>wheat pudding.

>

>I also need to clarify that I didn't come up with the

>idea on my own. The dish has a long history and is

>made by a few different ethnic groups, all of whom

>claim that it creates its own sugar during cooking.

>

> > The enzymes would remain active until the internal temperature

> > became high enough to unravel the peptide bonds.

>

>Yes, that was my understanding as well. Maybe all the

>sugar is produced in the first few seconds of cooking

>before the enzymes denature, but then I wonder why the

>long cooking period is required. I make only small

>batches that take less than a half of an hour, but most

>people make large batches, calling for a few pounds of

>flour, and which take a few hours of cooking.

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

Wonder if the latest virus has gotten to your computer? Find out. Run the

FREE McAfee online computer scan!

http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> Isn't that what happens when you carmelize onions? Doesn't the

> carmelization proceed faster the more it is cooked, rather then

> slower, and isn't it quite clear most of the sugar is formed

> toward the latter end of cooking rather than the beginning? IOW,

> you can't sear onion or sautee them for five minutes and expect

> them to carmelize.

Onions, even when raw, contain alot of their own sugar,

and I don't think caramelization involves creating sugar.

It's the conversion of sugar into something else - caramel.

When onions are slowly cooked until dark brown and crisp,

in other words, when they are _completely_ caramelized,

they're much less sweet than when raw, and if I remember

correctly, caramel coloring in a bottle isn't sweet at

all. Although I could be wrong and maybe caramel is merely

a form or state of sugar. Does anybody here know what,

in exact chemical terms, caramelized sugar is?

> As a relatively unimportant aside, my understanding is that

> denaturation refers primarily to the destruction of the tertiary

> structure, and maybe the secondary structure, of the protein,

> which would consist primarily of breaking disulfide bridges and

> some hydrogen bonds.

So does that mean enzymes can still keep working after

being denatured, or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..

>

>So does that mean enzymes can still keep working after

>being denatured, or not?

>

>

My textbook states: Higher temperatures denature the enzyme, altering its

specific three-dimensional shape and destroying its function.

The shape determines which chemical reaction the enzyme catalyzes. Like I

wrote earlier, it is a lock and key structure; if you melt a lock, no way

you are opening it with the key.

take care

michele

_________________________________________________________________

Cell phone ‘switch’ rules are taking effect — find out more here.

http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-

According to the USDA, 100g of raw onions contains 10.11g of carbs,

including a mere 4.28g of sugar, but if you make French Onion Soup the

old-fashioned way -- cooking the onions in the stock for a long time -- the

soup gets very sweet.

>Onions, even when raw, contain alot of their own sugar,

>and I don't think caramelization involves creating sugar.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--- In , Idol <Idol@c...>

wrote:

>

> According to the USDA, 100g of raw onions contains 10.11g of carbs,

> including a mere 4.28g of sugar, but if you make French Onion Soup

> the old-fashioned way -- cooking the onions in the stock for a long

> time -- the soup gets very sweet.

That doesn't really lend anything to the argument

that caramelization increases sweetness, if that's

what you intended. Because no caramelization is

possible during boiling or simmering. Caramelization

requires heat well above the boiling point. French

onion soup involves frying the onions in fat before

adding them to the stock, does it not? It's during

that preliminary stage alone that any caramelization

could possibly take place. Maybe though, you instead

meant to lend to the argument that extended simmering

breaks down starches into sugars, in which case that

might be so. I don't really know. Although another

explanation might be that the progressive break down

of more and more onion cell walls during simmering

releases progressively more and more sugar into the

broth where it can be tasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-

>Maybe though, you instead

>meant to lend to the argument that extended simmering

>breaks down starches into sugars, in which case that

>might be so. I don't really know.

That's what I meant, and it is so.

>Although another

>explanation might be that the progressive break down

>of more and more onion cell walls during simmering

>releases progressively more and more sugar into the

>broth where it can be tasted.

No, the figures I gave you from the USDA database are gleaned from

combustion, so there are no phantom extra carbs (aside from ordinary sample

and variety variation, of course). The simmering simply breaks down starch

into sugar.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different substances have different specific heat capacity. Water at

150 degrees would hurt your tongue, but something dry like nuts

doesn't give off heat the same way. If you eat a bowl of soup that is

steaming hot, fresh off the stove, the carrots will feel a lot hotter

than the meat.

It really doesn't take something as small as nut long to heat up, so

I'm still looking for answers to my questions. Thanks for your idea,

though.

Tom

> Tom,

> this isn't necessarily true. I have dried hazelnuts in a 150 degree

oven

> and even after they have been in there a couple hours I can stand

there and

> eat them straight from the oven. If they were 150 degrees, I

shouldn't be

> able to do that. I think Sally says somewhere if it burns your

mouth it is

> above 118 degrees and also enzymes are being destroyed at that point.

> danny

>

> Creek Bend Dairy Farm

> Harry & Peggy Strite

> 11917 Snug Harbor Lane

> port, MD 21795

> 301-582-4135

> cbdfarm@i...

>

>

>

> If the seeds are in the oven overnight, as NT suggests, they are

> surely at oven temp all the way through, and probably for most of the

> night. I would think that after an hour or two they're already at 150,

> because 1. they're small unlike a thick roast of meat (the interior of

> which will never reach oven temp normally) and 2. 150 is not much

> above room temp so it takes much less time to get there.

>

> Tom

>

>

> ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So to get back to the original question, why was the assumption made

that enzymes are breaking down the starches, or otherwise making more

sugar? I think heat alone is responsible for breaking the starches

down into sugars. So where did the idea that enzymes become *more*

active at cooking temps come from? That seems illogical to me.

Tom

> >

> > According to the USDA, 100g of raw onions contains 10.11g of carbs,

> > including a mere 4.28g of sugar, but if you make French Onion Soup

> > the old-fashioned way -- cooking the onions in the stock for a long

> > time -- the soup gets very sweet.

>

> That doesn't really lend anything to the argument

> that caramelization increases sweetness, if that's

> what you intended. Because no caramelization is

> possible during boiling or simmering. Caramelization

> requires heat well above the boiling point. French

> onion soup involves frying the onions in fat before

> adding them to the stock, does it not? It's during

> that preliminary stage alone that any caramelization

> could possibly take place. Maybe though, you instead

> meant to lend to the argument that extended simmering

> breaks down starches into sugars, in which case that

> might be so. I don't really know. Although another

> explanation might be that the progressive break down

> of more and more onion cell walls during simmering

> releases progressively more and more sugar into the

> broth where it can be tasted.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 12/18/03 1:22:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,

liberty@... writes:

> >So where did the idea that enzymes become *more* active at

> >cooking temps come from? That seems illogical to me.

>

> Well that was my whole point in commenting in the first

> place. Since it seemed illogical to me that enzymes would

> work _at all_, much less more actively once they reached

> cooking temperature, given all that we're told.

Guys, it would be thoroughly illogical to assume this *wouldn't* happen. The

enzymes don't work at all once they are denatured, but of course they will

work faster the hotter it gets *until* they get denatured.

I agree it seems counter-intuitive in the sense that one would expect them to

be denatured by that point. But if that assumption is wrong (after all, we

don't know how long they take to be denatured, nor the temperature at which any

given specific enzyme denatures) the logic that the enzyme activity would

accelerate with heat is completely sound.

What isn't so sound is that heat could break down *anything*. Heat is

incapable of breaking down any substance into any other; the only thing it can

do is

speed up a chemical reaction.

Water is what breaks down starches, and is also what denatures proteins, and

is also what hydrolyzes proteins. Enzymes catalyze these reactions and heat

accelerates them.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--- In , " Tom " <cassiusdio@g...>

wrote:

>

> So to get back to the original question, why was the assumption

> made that enzymes are breaking down the starches, or otherwise

> making more sugar?

Because it's repeated again and again in the sources,

and by the Iranian community who make their own version

of the pudding, called " samanu " . Also because sprouted

wheat is required for it to work, and what else could

come from the sprouted wheat that would make the pudding

turn sweet, except starch digesting enzymes?

> I think heat alone is responsible for breaking the starches down

> into sugars.

That's hard for me to believe though, because I've cooked

starch based sauces and soups and never were any of them

anywhere as sweet as samanu.

> So where did the idea that enzymes become *more* active at

> cooking temps come from? That seems illogical to me.

Well that was my whole point in commenting in the first

place. Since it seemed illogical to me that enzymes would

work _at all_, much less more actively once they reached

cooking temperature, given all that we're told.

Hopefully somebody on the list will try making samanu for

themselves one day, and then will be able to confirm what

I say about it. Are there any Irani on the list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...