Guest guest Posted April 21, 2001 Report Share Posted April 21, 2001 I wonder if any of u caught the implication of the bottle game? it was an example of step 4: 1=look 2=see 3=observe. compare, come to conclusions these are the steps of science n where science usually ends --------------------------------------------------------------- 4- apply the process to yield a spiritual implication this is matching the visible w/invisible world = unus mundus the bottle game is a party game for woop-de-dooers but it concealed an inner implication, there for discerning.... so many simple things we do ev day can be unlocked by playing Sophia's games i think this is one way - for me, at least - to interpret the dream in which jung shouted - 'consider the obvious - i did!' it just takes a few moments of speculation, any day, any where....but it works! like the zipper, going up = symbolos - 2 bec 1 n tab = transcendent function; going down - dia-bolos, 1 iuto 2 - process of separation......ego fr div guest since the West is materialistic, we can find spirit in the material - i call this endophysics. 'turn the stone, n i am there; cleave the wood, n i am there also - gospel acc to ? there is no place wh spirit is not to be found if the cosmos is a hologram.. it seems important to point this out but honestly, the sacred really can be found also in the commonplace! the problem is that this is so Simple! exhausted tonight, but happy love ao Alice O. Howell Rosecroft 72 Beartown Mt. Road Monterey, MA 01245 USA Tel: Fax: " Look for the sacred in the commonplace! " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2001 Report Share Posted April 21, 2001 Hi Alice, and all, I just started reading a book called Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism tonight. What I read so far in the first 4 chapters deals with Ego. If the Ego identifies with some thing, be it an Archetypal image or feeling, it gets caught up in the identification. Is it possible that that is what I did with the love? I lost sight of everything else and identified with it? And now that it's gone(or rather the object of that love is gone) my Ego couldn't allow for the loss? (still don't have a grasp of this Ego thing yet I guess!) It also said that everything we do is Ego, trying to identify. Trungpa likened it to a junk shop and I liked that analogy. I have have a desire to accomplish this leaving things where I find them, instead of bringing them home(spiritually)to clutter up my Self. not an easy thing. And I don't want to just have it be my Ego trying some new thing either. The question is, how do you tell the difference??? The book says that the trick is to acknowledge, but not identify, or we face losing the Self or rather the self gets pushed to the unconscious. is that a correct interpretation? I will not go further with this thought, but if anyone cares to offer their opinion, I would appreciate it. Alice ...it's so good to hear you say you're happy tonight! Me too for a change! I love that zipper analogy, have since the first time I read it. Makes me feel that no matter how much the outer feels apart from it all, I know I am part of it all. In finding the sacred in the common place....I know for myself that I get so caught up in the swirling emotions inside my head that I forget to see. Today I spent a great deal of time in one of my favorite places, outside, in the woods. A place I spent much time as a teenager, trying to escape the inner angst of outer drama so prevelent in a teenagers life. It was one place where I could feel at peace. It was a place where I could really slow down and think with calrity and find internal answers. It's never let me down and today was no different. I am slowly coming to peace with the inner me again. Kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2001 Report Share Posted April 22, 2001 In a message dated 4/21/01 10:48:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, shadowseekergrl@... writes: > we face losing the Self or rather the self gets pushed to the > unconscious. is that a correct interpretation? > > u cannot push the Self aside! acc to Jung, it dwells in the unconscious n never fully incarnates. think centerpt of circle - pts have no dimension ergo are where we connect to the unus mundus, bey time/space. it is a LUMINOUS pt of light,life,love. as a Gemini just try using the word AND instead of OR n medit on a triangle! relax! u remind me of old egypt story ab the centipede. someone asked it how it managed to co-ordinate so many legs? 'i never thought ab it,' it replied. so wh it tried to be consc of this, it got all hopelessly tangled up! self-absorption can get out of hand - just a little dab a day is plenty - go out n live, work, play n remember wh Buddha said: 4 noble truths 1. there is suffering in this world 2. all suffering COMES FROM ATTACHMENT AND DESIRE 3. there is a way out of suffering 4. this is to follow the Noble Eightfold Path to be cont. sun is shining, we gots daffydils just ready to open, SPRING AT LAST!! love fr a daffy ao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2001 Report Share Posted April 22, 2001 << relax! u remind me of old egypt story ab the centipede. someone asked it how it managed to co-ordinate so many legs? 'i never thought ab it,' it replied. so wh it tried to be consc of this, it got all hopelessly tangled up! >> I love this. I've done that with the same disasterous results. Reminds me, too, of the the nasty way to beat tennis. Just before the match, say to your opponent: I love your backhand! How do you do that? Where do you put your elbow? Daffodils and narcissus are out, and the forsythia a cloud of yellow in front of my house. Put thistle seeds in the bird feeder and have had a crowd of purple finches and goldfiches. Catboy Mouse is the birdwatcher. Happy Spring! phoebe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2001 Report Share Posted April 22, 2001 First class book, Kath, but Trungpa, too, is a trickster who doesn't reveal himself on first reading. As one lama friend put it: 'Do the think the Tibetans are so stupid as to leave their most prize possessions lying around on pieces of paper?' > The book says that the trick is to acknowledge, but not identify, or > we face losing the Self or rather the self gets pushed to the > unconscious. is that a correct interpretation? *This is the same as I was telling you the other day: acknowledge and let go, acknowledge and let go... It's like breathing. You breathe in; you breathe out... No need to hold onto it - the *fact* of breathing, of oxygenating your blood stream, continues... Nothing to worry about. It's not so much a question of *losing* the Self as of losing *sight* of it and then forgetting where you are actually coming from... getting taken in by the focus-pull... > In finding the sacred in the common place....I know for myself that I > get so caught up in the swirling emotions inside my head that I > forget to see. > Today I spent a great deal of time in one of my favorite places, > outside, in the woods. A place I spent much time as a teenager, > trying to escape the inner angst of outer drama so prevelent in a > teenagers life. It was one place where I could feel at peace. It was > a place where I could really slow down and think with calrity and > find internal answers. It's never let me down and today was no > different. *Using a connection with some unspoiled place or thing outside the world of human preoccupation is a perfect way of finding your way back home. .... Of finding you *are* home and always have been home... (where on earth else would you go?) > I am slowly coming to peace with the inner me again. *Well then note that that cannot be done by 'thinking'... You don't 'think' yourself to sleep or into a state of relaxation, do you. You accept and let go... Dat's what it's about! m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2001 Report Share Posted April 22, 2001 > In a message dated 4/21/01 10:48:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > relax! u remind me of old egypt story ab the centipede. someone asked it how > it managed to co-ordinate so many legs? 'i never thought ab it,' it replied. > so wh it tried to be consc of this, it got all hopelessly tangled up! Oh Alice this feels like me! I was ok until i started to think about it. I used to just do it, but now I feel like I don't know how. Thank you. This makes so much more sense than anything else right now. I don't know what it means, and am going to give it so much more reflection , but when I first read you saying to meditate on a triangle, it made me cry. I don't often do that for no reason, so I will have to figure out why. And when I get it, I'll let you know! Thanks AO It's a beautiful day here and My son and i have been outside basking in the sun and doing some much needed yard work. I am going back out to play. Kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2001 Report Share Posted April 22, 2001 In a message dated 4/22/1 1:06:01 PM, you wrote: << Put thistle seeds in the bird feeder >> Oh phoebe, thanks for the idea. I pass a bulk grain store every day. Their sign says, " We have Thistle seeds. " I wondered what to make of this. Could I just sprinkle some out in the cemetary behind my place? Will I then see a flock of birds? My view of the spring flowers are those which decorate the gravestones in the cemetary in my backyard. Believe me there are lots of them. Interesting way to enjoy Spring but what the heck. Several weeks ago, a small group of young children were flying a kite in the cemetary. Didn't bother them where they were. Doesn't bother me. merry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2001 Report Share Posted April 22, 2001 << Could I just sprinkle some out in the cemetary behind my place? Will I then see a flock of birds? My view of the spring flowers are those which decorate the gravestones in the cemetary in my backyard. Believe me there are lots of them. Interesting way to enjoy Spring but what the heck. Several weeks ago, a small group of young children were flying a kite in the cemetary. Didn't bother them where they were. Doesn't bother me. >> Probably should put it on a flat gravestone. Mine is in a hanging feeder... I have wonderful memories of playing in a cemetery when I was a kid. We were respectful of the graves -- I think we thought it was either bad luck or illegal to step on them. But my childhood friend Dicky and I used to sit on one flat gravestone that had a beautiful view of our little village (the cemetery was on, you guessed it: Cemetery Hill) and crack hazelnuts and eat them. On Thursday I'll be taking my grad students on a field trip to Mt Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge. It's a stress-buster before exams and commencement... really an arboretum and a lovely place. Great bird-watching, and we visit the graves of the two great American 19th Century actors Edwin Booth and Charlotte Cushman. Plus Amy Lowell, Buckminster Fuller, Winslow Homer, Longfellow, Baker Eddy... et al, all sleeping in a beautful space full of birdsong and flowers. lightly, lightly, phoebe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.