Guest guest Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 " Milk from implanted mothers needs to be tested for bound and unbound platinum. " Dr. ph Bubinak’s Testimony F D A Advisory Panel July 2002 The next speaker, and I apologize if I mispronounce your name, is Dr. ph Bubinak. DR. BUBINAK: Thank you, Mr. Chairman and all members of the advisory panel. I answer no to all four questions. I am a board-certified hematologist and medical oncologist. My undergraduate training led to degrees in mechanical engineering and science. I retired from active practice two years ago. One year ago, a former patient with a history of ruptured breast implant and a low platelet count called and said she was told that she was, quote, full of platinum, unquote. Excessive platinum was found in skin, subcutaneous tissue, blood, urine and subsequently bone marrow. This interested me because I have treated patients with platinum-based chemotherapy since 1976. A low platelet count is a frequent side effect. The first chemotherapy agent was cisplatin, which is also mutagenic, carcinogenic, leukemogenic and teratogenic. Platinum has been found in the milk of patients treated with platinum compounds. There is little information in the medical literature regarding an association of platinum with breast implants. Unfortunately, not everyone has a good result. Information obtained from many sources, including interviews with patients, physicians and researchers, reveal that some implant patients develop a variety of systemic complaints including malaise, hair loss, peripheral neuropathy which is sometimes disabling, loss of short-term memory, rash and other allergic manifestations, respiratory systems, constipation and anorexia, just to name a few. In short, these are the same side effects people treated with cisplatin cytotoxic chemotherapy experience. Increased intensity of systemic complaints commonly follow gross rupture of the implant. I was astounded to learn that the catalyst used to manufacture the silicone for silicone gel and silicone elastomer for both gel-filled and saline-filled implants was platinum chloride, a highly reactive molecule and precursor to the chemotherapy agent cisplatin. The chemistry of the polymerization process says that the platinum in ideal proportions is reduced to its inactive elemental form. This, however, does not correlate with the amount of platinum found in tissues both proximate and distant from the implant site. Two independent researchers now have found platinum in excessive concentration in tissues. Capsule formation around the implant, a frequent complicating event, tells the world that this device is not inert. Even without considering the seepage of low molecular weight silicones, the migration of reactive platinum alone can explain capsule formation. One package insert states that the literature suggests that radiation therapy may increase the likelihood of capsular contracture, necrosis and extrusion. I have witnessed this first hand. In this regard, you should understand that platinum-based chemotherapy is commonly used explicitly to sensitize the target tissue to the effects of radiation therapy. In conclusion, systemic systems do matter and must be listed as potential side effects in the package insert when patients are expected to give informed consent. Likewise, reports of symptomatic improvement in patients following explantation must also be included. Despite almost 40 years of clinical experience, there is not one good, solid, prospective epidemiologic study available. The largest study that I saw was a retrospective study, just last year, and that study showed increased risk for respiratory and brain cancers, and a non-significant increased risk for leukemia of various types. Milk from implanted mothers needs to be tested for bound and unbound platinum. Reliable, generally accepted methodology for determining free and bound levels of platinum in any tissue must be developed with all speed. Analysis for platinum DNA must be made available if other critical questions are to be answered. Long-term ex vivo testing of implants, subjected to realistic stresses while immersed in physiologic biologically active media at 37 degrees, are needed. Last, from a pure engineering perspective, considering the failure and complication rates, I wonder what reasoning could have led to the approval of these devices. Reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness--no one would argue against the beneficial psychological effects a positive body image will give. Safety means unhurt, secure from any harm. I urge this panel to approve only products that are truly safe and effective for all who desire them. Thank you. DR. WHALEN: Thank you, doctor. Any questions?? [No response] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.