Guest guest Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 > --- Carolyn Wolf <carwol@...> wrote: > > Subject: Fw: Your Voice is Needed Again: FDA > > ADVISORY PANEL IS STILL PUTTING INDUSTRY PROFITS > > OVER GOOD SCIENCE > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:58:14 -0400 > > > > Your Voice is Needed Again: FDA ADVISORY PANEL IS > > STILL PUTTING INDUSTRY PROFITS OVER GOOD > SCIENCEOnce > > again we ask for your help -- we need letters to > go > > to members of Congress, as well as the director of > > the FDA.. > > At the hearings scientists spoke about the high > > levels, in implanted women, of the heavy metal > > Platinum, which every tested woman had; their > > children who were born after the mother's > > implantation also showed elevated levels of the > > platinum. We don't know how many ill women and > > crippled children are needed --as well as death > > statistics -- in order to PROVE the danger of > these > > implants... This company has the pporest kept > > records of any manufacturer --have kept their own > > records for only 2 years, but " borrowed " the > records > > of plastic surgeons in England to present as > > evidence..They were told in 1992 to keep records > of > > all implantations, but supposedly, they just could > > not keep up with the records!! > > > > Thank you...Please pass on to everybody on your > > e-mail list.. > > > > Thanks! > > Carolyn > > Your Voice is Needed Again: FDA ADVISORY > > PANEL IS STILL PUTTING INDUSTRY PROFITS OVER GOOD > > SCIENCE > > > > > > Your Voice is Needed Again: FDA > > ADVISORY PANEL IS STILL PUTTING INDUSTRY PROFITS > > OVER GOOD SCIENCE > > > > FDA ADVISORY PANEL STILL > > PUTTING INDUSTRY PROFITS OVER GOOD SCIENCE Take > > Action! > > > > Split Decision by Implant > > Panel Leaves it Up to Dr. Crawford to Choose > Between > > Industry Profits and Women's Safety > > > > On Tuesday and Wednesday, > > April 12-13 the Food and Drug Administration's > > Advisory Panel on silicone breast implants > > recommended that one company's product be kept off > > the market, while another's could go forward for > > public use. FDA's own scientists found that both > > companies failed to sufficiently respond to > > questions regarding the safety of their devices, > but > > the panel still voted to ignore the scientific > > evidence. > > > > We must tell Acting > > Commissioner Dr. Lester Crawford to support the > > findings of FDA's own scientists. He must uphold > the > > integrity of the scientific process. > > > > Will Dr. Crawford protect > > America's health? His decision on this matter will > > tell. > > > > Dr. Crawford must reject > > both applications in order to: > > > > ·Restore credibility to > the > > FDA, and > > ·Protect women from health > > risks posed by silicone implants. > > > > Based on the scientific > > evidence from the industry's own data, there is no > > choice for Dr. Crawford but to reject these > > applications. > > > > For women across the > > country, THERE IS NO CHOICE WITHOUT A SAFE CHOICE. > > > > > MAKE SURE THAT THE FDA IS > > GUIDED BY SCIENCE, NOT POLITICS. > > > > Millions of women depend > on > > the FDA to set an unbiased, reasonable standard of > > safety. For the public, the FDA stamp of approval > > implies that there is no danger. Without long-term > > research on these implants it is impossible to > draw > > such a conclusion. > > > > TELL DR. CRAWFORD, MEMBERS > > OF CONGRESS, AND THE WHITE HOUSE THAT THE FDA MUST > > PUT SAFETY FIRST. FDA MUST PUT SCIENCE AHEAD OF > > INDUSTRY PROFITS AND REJECT APPROVAL OF SILICONE > > IMPLANTS FOR GENERAL USE. ACT NOW! > > > > After you have completed > > sending your message, please click the > Tell-a-Friend > > button at the bottom of the confirmation page to > ask > > your friends and family to send the message, too. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.