Guest guest Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Dana Schmidt knows about this!! Dana? Beebe, M.Ed., RLC, IBCLC Lactation Consultant/Postpartum Doula www.second9months.comwww.facebook.com/thesecond9months--- Subject: Duarte GalactosemiaTo: Date: Saturday, April 14, 2012, 12:43 PM Posted w/ permission. I am working with a client with a 5 1/2 week old baby girl, who tested positive for Duarte Galactosemia (DG). This was confirmed with two newborn screenings, and one further lab work done that broke down enzyme and glactose levels. (Below is what the test results showed. ) So far, baby has been exclusively breastfeed, but the genetics counselor is telling her that every DG patient is automatically told to go on soy formula. She has not seen a metabolic physician yet, her appointment is Thursday, so we are trying to rather any and all information possible to see if she can continue breastfeeding at least partially. At this point, the baby is showing no classical symptoms of Glactosemia, the mom has noted, however that she feels the baby is sleepier than should be, although baby is gaining weight normally. She was 9-14 at birth and at last weight was 10-15 (at 5 weeks). So, the main questions that I have is: Does anyone know of any research that points to EBF, or at least partially while supplementing with soy or lactose-free formula. If mom cuts out all dairy (including hidden) will this lower the glactose in her milk and make it easier for baby to process, and lower baby's Gal 1-P levels. If all research points to mom having to use formula, is their one that is better than the other (in regards to soy or lactose-free) Please post all info to entire group, as this is something that others may find beneficial. Thank you so much for any information you can share. M-T IBCLC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 I sent her the message as well, to make sure she sees it > > > Subject: Duarte Galactosemia > To: > Date: Saturday, April 14, 2012, 12:43 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > Posted w/ permission. > > > > I am working with a client with a 5 1/2 week old baby girl, who > > tested positive for Duarte Galactosemia (DG). This was confirmed with two newborn screenings, and one further lab work done that broke down enzyme and glactose levels. (Below is what the test results showed. ) So far, baby has been exclusively breastfeed, but the genetics counselor is telling her that every DG patient is automatically told to go on soy formula. She has not seen a metabolic physician yet, her appointment is Thursday, so we are trying to rather any and all information possible to see if she can continue breastfeeding at least partially. At this point, the baby is showing no classical symptoms of Glactosemia, the mom has noted, however that she feels the baby is sleepier than should be, although baby is gaining weight normally. She was 9-14 at birth and at last weight was 10-15 (at 5 weeks). > > > > So, the main questions that I have is: > > > > Does anyone know of any research that points to EBF, or at least partially while supplementing with soy or lactose-free formula. > > > > If mom cuts out all dairy (including hidden) will this lower the glactose in her milk and make it easier for baby to process, and lower baby's Gal 1-P levels. > > > > If all research points to mom having to use formula, is their one that is better than the other (in regards to soy or lactose-free) > > > > Please post all info to entire group, as this is something that others may find beneficial. > > > > Thank you so much for any information you can share. > > > > M-T > > IBCLC > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 So first I have to tell you that I am not a genetics counselor. With that being said, I can tell you this. DG Galactosemia is NOT Classic Galactosemia. The DG stands for one copy of the Duarte (milder Galactomemia) and one copy of the Classic Galactosemia gene. What this means that is that the baby has at least 25% enzyme activity to break down galactose/lactose found in breastmilk (in this case). Babies with Classic Galactosemia have less than 5% activity and are quite ill within the first few days of life from the build-up of toxins (jaundice not otherwise explained, e. coli sepsis, etc). There are metabolic physicians who are comfortable with allowing babies to remain on breastmilk with DG Galactosemia as long as they are clinically well and do not have critically elevated Gal-1-P levels. There are some that are not. In that case, it is recommended that the baby remain on soy formula for the first four months of life. After that time, a breast milk challenge is done to see if the baby's liver is mature enough to metabolize the Gal-1-P. A breastfeeding mother is advise to pump and store until that. Summer heat can affect newborn screening cards so you may get many false positives during this time. Still it is very important to follow up with a metabolic specialist before advising your client about the removal or continuation of a breastmilk diet. Should your client receive news that their baby had a positive Newborn Screen, remember that this must be CONFIRMED by metabolic testing as the newborn screen is just that - a SCREEN. To read more about Galactosemia: Newborn Screening ACT Sheet [Absent/Reduced Galactose-1-Phosphate Uridyltransferase (GALT)] Classical Galactosemia and Understanding Galactosemia Mom reducing her intake of lactose will not benefit the baby. Remember, lactose and galactose are in breast milk and cow's milk so soy formula is recommended for a complete elimination in the diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 Lactose is not the same as protein. Human milk is HIGH in lactose for a reason -- human babies have bigger brains per body weight than any other mammal. Brains need sugar. The type of sugar brains need is lactose. So, the content of lactose in milk is constant no matter what the mother does to her diet. Drinking another species milk has ZERO influence on lactose content. Cow's don't drink milk and they make milk with sufficient lactose for their calves. In fact, we are the only mammals who ROUTINELY drink the milk of another species (there are some rare cases of orphaned animals suckling from other species). The reason why cow's milk might need to be eliminated from a mother's diet is WHEN the cow's milk PROTEINS pass through to the milk and the baby has a reaction to the PROTEINS in the milk. Sugars are broken down by an enzyme which all babies have unless they have rare genetic Galactosemia disorders. PROTEINS are not the same as SUGARS. The cartoon show Jimmy Neutron got this wrong where Jimmy and his friends talk about the llamas being lactose intolerant AND allergic to llama milk in the same sequence. Every time my poor son watched that episode, he would tell me to not tell him again why that didn't make sense. I know there is a lot of discussion about lactose intolerance in babies, but for the most part, I don't believe that most of the research really supports that it is widespread. I believe that most of what is characterized as lactose intolerance in breastfed babies is overactive milk ejection reflex - which leads to gulping down the food too fast -- which leads to indigestion. I believe that some moms will go on crazy pumping schedules and can feed the freezer with enough of the milk pumped after feedings to end up putting more of the fat into the freezer and creating imbalances. I do NOT believe that moms can create lactose intolerance by allowing their babies to switch to a new breast when the baby is no longer swallowing on that breast. As for formulas -- there are so many ingredients that cause indigestion that of course they exploit this by creating more and more different types of formula so parents end up spending money chasing down THE formula that will fix what could have been fixed with human milk. I recently went on diapers.com to help a mother who couldn't find a ready to feed liquid formula and it made me need to go to TWO back to back Martial Arts classes to recuperate from the horrendously deceptive advertising. (The second class was jiu jitsu which I am completely inept at -- yet in what was my fourth class ever I must have put my frustrations into it because I pinned a guy who weighed double what I do. I don't know who was more surprised by it.) This baby has an enzymatic disorder where the sugar is not broken down in the gut. This is a TRUE case of lactose intolerance. Soooo, it would only make sense to explore ways to provide this baby with milk where the lactose has been broken down. It would not make sense to change the mother's diet. It seems to me that if you can break down the lactose in cow's milk, you can do the same to human milk. Nevertheless, I know nothing about how one could do this. Best regards, E. Burger, MHS, PhD, IBCLC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 *Thanks* for this info, Dana - very interesting & useful! Fay Bosman, IBCLC www.nwmothernurture.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 There was a LLL Leaven (the Leader only publication) article last year or the year before from a Leader who had a baby with Duarte Galactosemia. I remember the Leader saying she was able to partially breastfeed and her doctor changed the amount of breastmilk depending on what blood test levels were. She said the hardest part was keeping up her supply during the times when her baby needed more of the lactose-free formula and having enough breastmilk when her baby needed less of the formula. If you want me to find the article and email it to you just let me know. I'm kind of curious to hear what will happen in this case. My thinking if baby isn't showing any symptoms it would be okay to continue breastfeeding until the condition is confirmed and the doctor comes up with an amount baby can handle. But since I'm not a doctor and have never worked with this condition that may not be the right way to go. Heinz, BA IBCLC Beach Babies Lactation Support, LLC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 This is why some metabolic doctors do not feel comfortable allowing breastfeeding even with the milder duarte galactosemia. The reason why they challenge babies at 4, 6 or 12 months is that those the typical times when milk is not the primary source of nutrition, so less galactose in the diet.Mild galactosemia (also known as Duarte-variant)Children with mild galactosemia usually have symptoms that are less severe than seen in the classic form. Some have no symptoms at all and do not need treatment. Children with mild galactosemia that do need treatment but do not receive it may develop one or more of the following:Early cataractsMild mental retardation or learning delaysAtaxia (unsteady gait)Delays in growthSpeech problems and delaysSome girls with mild galactosemia will have delayed periods or do not get their periods at all. Some women with mild galactosemia start menopause early or have ‘premature ovarian failure’ in which the ovaries stop releasing eggs earlier than normal menopause. Some, but not all, African Americans with galactosemia have an even milder variant form. These individuals usually do not have serious health effects from their mild galactosemia. I think this important for all of us to understand and to help parents who may need to pump for that amount of time. The metabolic specialists that I have worked with FULLY support breastfeeding but support avoidance of anything harmful to babies. When weighing out the risks and benefits, some will recommend avoidance of all milk products including breastmilk for a certain amount of time with variants of galactosemia. Remember with Classic Galactosemia, they must stop breastfeeding or the baby will die, probably within the first week of life and it's a horrible horrible death. Avoiding milk (including breastmilk) will save these babies - that is why this disorder is on the Newborn Screening Test.The following are treatments often advised for children with classic galactosemia:1. Lactose and galactose-free diet: People with classic galactosemia are encouraged to follow a lactose and galactose-free food plan throughout life. Lactose or galactose are found in the following foods, all of which must be avoided:Milk and all dairy productsProcessed and pre-packaged foods often contain lactoseTomato saucesSome candiesCertain medications – tablets, capsules, sweetened liquid drops that contain lactose as a fillerSome fruits and vegetables also contain galactoseAny foods or drugs which contain the ingredients lactulose, casein, caseinate, lactalbumin, curds, whey, or whey solids.Your dietitian will help you develop a food plan that allows your child to avoid lactose and galactose while still eating the right amount of protein, nutrients and energy to keep him or her healthy. Your child’s food plan will depend on many things such as his or her age, weight, general health, and blood test results. Your dietician will fine-tune your child’s diet over time. The special food plan should be continued throughout life. 2. Special lactose-free formulaNewborns with galactosemia are given a special formula free of lactose. The most common formulas used for babies with galactosemia are those made with soy protein isolate.Isomil® and Prosobee® are two formulas that are made with soy protein isolate. Soy milk itself contains galactose and should not be used.http://www.newbornscreening.info/Parents/otherdisorders/Galactosemia.html#4 A lactose free formula is NOT indicated for a baby with Classic Galactosemia as those formulas may still have trace amounts of lactose. In a Duarte, depending on the level of GAl-1-P and if the baby cannot tolerate soy, a lactose free formula may be considered. As far as I know, there is no way to completely remove lactose/galactose from breastmik. Does anyone else know? When I worked at Yale University, I was the Newborn Screening Nurse. Believe me, I had my fair share of crying mothers who had just established breastfeeding when I had to tell them to stop and pump. This happened most often in summer when the filter cards were affected by sitting in hot mailboxes or UPS trucks. If your "mothers" are told their baby has Galactosemia, ask them if it was confirmed by a metabolic center (like Yale University) or was that result of the newborn screening. Newborn Screening is not diagnostic but can give a hint about whether or not a baby needs more testing. Unless the metabolic centers recommends, it is best to test the baby while she is still on milk products so to understand whether or not her body can metabolize it. During my time at Yale, we identified many variants but not one Classic Galactosemic through Newborn Screening. However, there was a child who was critically ill with liver failure there in the hospital affiliated with us. He was from a South American country that does not do Newborn Screening. He was exclusively breastfeed and became very ill and was flown to Yale for a liver transplant. It was determined at that time that he was affected by Classic Galactosemia. Dana Schmidt, BS, RN, IBCLCCradlehold, DirectorBreastfeeding Education & Supportwww.cradlehold.netProviding the minimum amount of intervention for the minimum amount of time for maximum benefit to mother and baby We do not seek to establish any professional relationship with any person or entity as a result of any visit to this Website. Transmission of the information is not intended to create and receipt does not create, a doctor-patient or other professional relationship between you and any medical professional or other individual on this Website. Persons contacting us or any medical professional through this Website should not send personal health, confidential, or sensitive information, and should not ask specific medical questions. The Website is a public forum and any comments that you make or submit to us may be displayed publicly on that forum, so you should be cautious about making such comments. No information submitted electronically through the Website or email to us will be treated as privileged, confidential, sensitive or personal health information unless we have previously entered into a written agreement with you to protect such information. Any person submitting confidential or sensitive information to us without first entering a prior written agreement with us to protect such information waives all rights to confidential protection or doctor-patient privilege. We assume no responsibility for the loss or disclosure of any information that you transmit to us via the Internet. Please call or visit www.cradlehold.net for an evaluation. Please see the attached should you desire more in-depth lactation advice.Home Consultations Breastfeeding Home Visit Services: To: Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:09 AM Subject: Re: Duarte Galactosemia *Thanks* for this info, Dana - very interesting & useful! Fay Bosman, IBCLC www.nwmothernurture.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.