Guest guest Posted January 16, 2000 Report Share Posted January 16, 2000 Morning, Find this interesting. I've a sister (I've three sisters) but one is very attached to her own physical beauty and always dates guys who are at least 6'3' and doctors. She is very attached to the physical, material, egotistical level of life. She's alot of fun, very beautiful, white blonde hair, green eyes and elfin dimples, but she's also, in my book, very superficial. She candidly admits this (thank God) so, at least it's liveable, and she makes laughter of it with her Leo Moon, but she also recognizes that her mind needs a bit of work and she does attempt to read and become more rounded. Bottom line is we're not all in the same place or evolving the same, or equal, those who are still scaling the material mountain of glitz and glamour are there and that's okay, I think for those of us who found the material mountain empty, and found other mountains to climb, we're just there, on a different path. Is it better? Well, I guess the only way to look is to see how much satisfaction is derived from one's life, how much serenity is there. Another example, is my brother, who is also physically very beautiful, brilliant engineer, blew his physics professors' minds, modeled, and now worth several million as the owner of his own high tech company. Questions are: Is it enough? Is he happy? Is he serene? If I were asked to trade my life for his, I wouldn't do it for my life, I know my inner life is a tapestry that isn't worth all the oil paintings and sculptures he may have... I love him dearly and he did fulfill my father's goals, and that was to reattain to what my father left behind in Europe. But, I will say this for my wise young brother, Jim, he cannot wait to retire (he's 34) and go hike in the Amazon, and talk to the Indians there, and hike the Andes and hike the Himalayas, he's very aware of the fact that the superficialities, even though he does huge work with inner city kids, cannot replace what he's missing on the inside, and that this work he's done will allow him to begin the quest that he thinks will take the rest of his life, and that's too find his own spiritual path. We all take our own path, and the paths differ like the variances of harmonies of music, and there are infinite variations, like some colors which are beyond the range of my limited human eyes and sounds which are beyond the range of my limited human ears ... but I know there are things beyond my ken, and that is exactly what makes the infinite mystery so fascinating, it's a journey, <g> not a destination :-). Love bo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2000 Report Share Posted January 16, 2000 Wile on this subject, I use Eudora Light and Iname which no longer seems to like to send messages to AOL (to the extent that I've had to create a second account just for AOL friends)... No problem when I mail through the list, but I can't mail them direct... Bi-zarre!... Being 5'6 " in my socks, I spoke to Vera about this question of tall guys (she's a good 1 " or so taller than I am). She reckons tall guys are attractive on the immediate caveman level, but tend to be arrogant as far as women go because of it. She finds beauty in kindness, long hairedness, open-heartedness, and points out to this end that even very ugly guys are easily utterly loveable because of who andf not what they are. I find much the same with women. I find it very difficult, generally, to speak to women who are considered to be - or consider themselves to be - very beautiful because they expect me to react to them in a certain way and will either project it onto anything I am saying or doing, or be very confused if they can't. Beauty, for me, really lies in the honesty and down-to-earthness of the person - in their ability to laugh at themselves and allow and even aid others to grow around them... There are, of course, bodies I find more or less 'beautiful' aesthetically, faces also, but not necessarily the ones Hollywood tells me I should, and as to eighteen-year-olds, I tend to find them dumb - numbed, perhaps, by everything that's happening to them and trapped in a static vision of what love, freedom, pleasure and release might mean... The beautiful ones - i. e., the ones that escape this channelling - the one's I call 'faries' and 'dakinis' are objects (subjects) of delight rather than concupiscence. Just my world view from down here (at least my legs are long enough to reach the ground when I'm standing - It's not that I'm small, my eldest son tells me: just that I'm speaking to you all from very far away) m m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.