Guest guest Posted July 12, 2012 Report Share Posted July 12, 2012 Anyone got access to the International Journal of Pediatrics to read the actual research about bf babies being at higher risk of developing nut allergies than babies fed other food and liquid? Sounds suspicious to me and I'd like to know if the research was well-run or not. Dee Kassing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2012 Report Share Posted July 13, 2012 Hi Dee -- I found the full text version for free online. I am going to attempt to put a copy in the Files for our group. I haven't read it yet but as a mama with 2 nut allergic children who never had a drop of formula, I will be very curious as to what it says. Thanks for alerting us -- Carroll > > Anyone got access to the International Journal of Pediatrics to read the actual research about bf babies being at higher risk of developing nut allergies than babies fed other food and liquid? Sounds suspicious to me and I'd like to know if the research was well-run or not. > Dee Kassing > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2012 Report Share Posted July 13, 2012 I thought I'd share a few pieces from the study. Someone else more qualified than me will need to analyze the study design. In a nutshell (ha ha!) it seemed overly simplistic to me and was confirmed by the study authors who stated in the conclusion, " the study design does not allow causality to be inferred. " Of course, the popular media will ignore the section on study flaws. About 15,000 parents of children entering kindergarten were given a questionnaire about infant feeding practices and nut allergy. Parents were asked if their child had ever had a strong allergic reaction to peanuts and/or other nuts. Then they were asked the following about infant feeding: Age when BFing ceased, was child " fed any fluids or food, other than breast milk for the first 6 months? " Then they were asked to specify what they received: water, juice, baby cereal, vegetables, formula, other. Of children reported to be BF as infants, >4% reported nut allergy. Of children not BF, 2.72% nut allergy. Other tidbits... early intro of complementary foods (prior to 4mos) reduced risk of peanut sensitization and " prolonged breastfeeding has been shown to increase odds of developing a peanut allergy by almost 3 times that of children who were weaned at or before 6 months. " Carroll > > Anyone got access to the International Journal of Pediatrics to read the actual research about bf babies being at higher risk of developing nut allergies than babies fed other food and liquid? Sounds suspicious to me and I'd like to know if the research was well-run or not. > Dee Kassing > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2012 Report Share Posted July 18, 2012 Or it could be that we forget that there are RISKS of allergies period. The RISKS of allergies are HIGHER under certain conditions when formula is used. Best regards, E. Burger, MHS, PhD, IBCLC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.