Guest guest Posted August 28, 2001 Report Share Posted August 28, 2001 , I know that farmers feed the skim milk to hogs as they do fine on it. I suppose it could also be used in recipes that have other sources of fat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2001 Report Share Posted August 28, 2001 Dear Alison--the skimmed milk was given to the pigs! (Which turned it into nutritious fat.) Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2001 Report Share Posted August 28, 2001 Another thing, in the past milk had much more fat in it--the cream would take up about 1/3 of the container. So you could remove some and still have milk with cream in it. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 I know that this is not a perfect solution...But most of us use mozzarella cheese. This is a lower fat milk cheese and according to some of my friends who make it regularly, a very easy cheese to make. I have a hard time throwing perfectly good milk out the door as well. I do not have any pigs to feed and never will because I would never raise or keep pork in my house. I also know that some people feed milk to their chickens, cats, dogs, and any other animals they have around. They are a family of three with one milk cow and a few goats and they have a lot of milk to get rid of! Back in times when everyone farmed and had as much food as they could ever want would just get rid of the skim milk, but now with food as a commodity item it is all worth some monetary amount. Milk is worth quite a bit of money especially if you are getting a specialty milk. So it is hard to look at the gallon of milk you just paid good money for, skim a little off the top and throw the rest down the drain. If you are just skimming the milk with a ladle, there will be some fat content left to your milk. This is what I usually do, I skim only half of the cream off to use and then we still drink the milk. None of these options is perfect I know, but I can always hear the saying, "there are starving people in some parts of the world, eat all your food!" which makes it harder to throw out food.... I have wondered though...With most Americans drinking skim milk, what happens to all that cream? a Augustine I wish you enough sun to keep your attitude bright.I wish you enough rain to appreciate the sun more.I wish you enough happiness to keep your spirit alive.I wish you enough pain so that the smallest joys in life appear much bigger.I wish you enough gain to satisfy your wanting.I wish you enough loss to appreciate all that you possess.I wish you enough ''Hello's" to get you through the final goodbye.--anonymous ----- Original Message ----- From: Alison Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: another butter question Here's a question for you-This may be obvious to some of you, but I can't seemto figure it out. On the one hand, we should drinkonly whole milk, but on the other hand, we should eatlots of fresh butter. I think one of the reasons I'vebeen putting off making butter, is that I don't knowwhat I'll do with all the skim milk I'll have leftover. I don't want to waste it! So somebody justreassure me it's ok to make lowfat cheese or yogurt!) How is the skim milk leftover from making buttertraditionally used?Alison__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 Dear Alan, The pig makes vitamin D through the action of sunlight on its skin (just like humans) and stores it in his fat. Lard is really one of the best sources of vitamin D. (It is also a great cooking fat) The body can make saturated fats from carbohydrates, but fats are more satisfying, slow down digestion (and the rush of sugars to the bloodstream) keep blood sugar on an even keel, and probably perform lost of other functions. The human body does not crave fat for nothing. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 The amount of fat is a function of the breed (Jerseys and Guernseys produce more) and the quality of the pasture. The milk we purchased in France was 1/3 cream. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 A lot of the cream goes into ice cream--much more profitable. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 a, You must have a nice load of cream with your milk! I have a different problem--I am getting (raw) milk and the fat content (I believe) is lower than it could be. I am happily supplementing our diet with good butter, coconut oil, and other fats, but I would love it if there were a way to add even more cream to the milk that we drink! My children would profit from the addition, since they do drink milk well. I've tried mail-ordering good raw cream to add to my milk but the couple of times I've ordered it, it's " enjoyed " so much jolting on the way to me that it arrived more as butter than cream! Has anyone any suggestions or experience in " enriching " raw milk? " a Augustine " < > <augustines@bi cc: gfoot.com> Subject: Re: another butter question 08/28/2001 10:03 PM Please respond to native-nutriti on If you are just skimming the milk with a ladle, there will be some fat content left to your milk. This is what I usually do, I skim only half of the cream off to use and then we still drink the milk. None of these options is perfect I know, but I can always hear the saying, " there are starving people in some parts of the world, eat all your food! " which makes it harder to throw out food.... I have wondered though...With most Americans drinking skim milk, what happens to all that cream? a Augustine I wish you enough sun to keep your attitude bright. I wish you enough rain to appreciate the sun more. I wish you enough happiness to keep your spirit alive. I wish you enough pain so that the smallest joys in life appear much bigger. I wish you enough gain to satisfy your wanting. I wish you enough loss to appreciate all that you possess. I wish you enough ''Hello's " to get you through the final goodbye. --anonymous ----- Original Message ----- From: Alison Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: another butter question Here's a question for you- This may be obvious to some of you, but I can't seem to figure it out. On the one hand, we should drink only whole milk, but on the other hand, we should eat lots of fresh butter. I think one of the reasons I've been putting off making butter, is that I don't know what I'll do with all the skim milk I'll have left over. I don't want to waste it! So somebody just reassure me it's ok to make lowfat cheese or yogurt! ) How is the skim milk leftover from making butter traditionally used? Alison __________________________________________________ Do You ? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Messenger http://phonecard./ Community email addresses:  Post message: onelist  Subscribe:   -subscribeonelist  Unsubscribe: -unsubscribeonelist  List owner:  -owneronelist Shortcut URL to this page:  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 * safallon@... (safallon@...) [010828 18:36]: * Subject: Re: another butter question: > > Dear Alison--the skimmed milk was given to the pigs! (Which turned it into > nutritious fat.) Sally Do you really believe that fat is nutritious? I find it hard to believe myself. The body can readily manufacture all but a few types of fat (w3 and w6), so why would the fat itself be of any importance? It seems much more reasonable to me that it is the fat-soluble nutrients that *may* be contained in fat that is of primary value. It is these nutrients that are not easy or even possible for the body to make. If so, feeding nutrient-poor skimmed milk to pigs, it seems, can only lead to nutrient-poor fat on the pig. I'm now leaning toward thinking that much of our sources of fat today are merely empty calories, in much the same way refined, white flour is. Am I totally off base here? --alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 * safallon@... (safallon@...) [010828 18:38]: * Subject: Re: another butter question: > > Another thing, in the past milk had much more fat in it--the cream would > take up about 1/3 of the container. So you could remove some and still have > milk with cream in it. Sally That's very interesting. Why do you suppose that is? Is it conceivable that the soil in which the cow food is grown is being rapidly depleted of its fertility? Surely it can't be only due to cow breeds as Jersey and Guernsey cows, though increasingly rare, don't produce anywhere near that much cream in my experience. --alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 * a Augustine (augustines@...) [010828 21:05]: * Subject: Re: another butter question: > I know that this is not a perfect solution...But most of us use > mozzarella cheese. This is a lower fat milk cheese and according to > some of my friends who make it regularly, a very easy cheese to make. > > I have a hard time throwing perfectly good milk out the door as well. > [ ... ] How about pooring it on your compost pile or garden to replentish the calcium, phosphorous, etc. content? --alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 --- In @y..., " a Augustine " <augustines@b...> wrote: > > I have wondered though...With most Americans drinking skim milk, what happens to all that cream? > a, I read somewhere that dairy companies just sell the cream separately, in different products that contain cream. So they are making double the money just by separating the milk! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2001 Report Share Posted August 30, 2001 * safallon@... (safallon@...) [010830 05:18]: * Subject: Re: another butter question: > Dear Alan, > > The pig makes vitamin D through the action of sunlight on its skin (just like > humans) and stores it in his fat. Lard is really one of the best sources of > vitamin D. So you feel that out of the thousands of known nutrients and tens of thousands (millions?) of unknown nutrients, one nutrient is sufficient to justify its use -- especially when that one nutrient is something we can manufacture ourselves? (Assuming we're not on cholesterol lowering drugs and we don't take the mainstream advice of staying out of the sun, of course.) I really don't mean to discount the value of vitamin D, I'm just not sure that with so many important fat-soluble nutrients, we can afford to consume fats that aren't better balanced. I'm no pig expert, but of the pigs I've seen raised on farms, all of them have had the absolute worst diets I've ever seen (except perhaps for all-too-frequent, twinky-subsisting American). An occasional corn-cob may well be the most nutritious thing they ever eat. They typically eat nothing but stale Wonder (white) bread and old, skim milk. Just what do this animals provide other than just straight-forward hydro-carbons (fats, protein, cholesterol, vitamin D, etc.). Where are the minerals and mineral-derived nutrients (Zn, Se, B12, etc.)? Why would I want to waste my time with such high-calorie, nutrient-poor food? > (It is also a great cooking fat) How well does vitamin D survive the high temp. cooking that lard is usually used for? I had always assumed that lard was almost all saturated fat, but when I learned years ago that it's only about 40% SF, I began to wonder how it could be a good cooking fat. The USDA database gives: SF% MUSF% PUSF% Lard 41.0 47.2 11.7 Butter 65.7 30.4 3.9 Coconut Oil 91.9 6.2 1.9 Does lard have some magic that protects the unsaturated bonds from moving to the trans- configuration? > The body can make saturated fats from carbohydrates, but fats are more > satisfying, slow down digestion (and the rush of sugars to the bloodstream) > keep blood sugar on an even keel, and probably perform lost of other > functions. The human body does not crave fat for nothing. But the body also craves sugar. I'd guess that in both cases, our bio/chemical/evolutionarily-derived bodies is expecting the sugar and the fat to be chuck full of nutrients, and when they are, they seem to satisfy the cravings, while the refined or low-nutrient versions don't. I might suggest that it is possible that the craving is not really for the fat (or sugar) so much as the nutrients, and if the apparent craving for fat (or sugar) doesn't go away, the food taken in didn't provide the body what it was looking for. --alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2001 Report Share Posted August 30, 2001 hi, alan and all-- > -- especially when that one nutrient is something we can manufacture > ourselves? (Assuming we're not on cholesterol lowering > drugs and we don't take the mainstream advice of staying > out of the sun, of course.) did you read the article on D, which sally recommended recently? http://www.westonaprice.org/Nutr_D.html >Why would I > want to waste my time with such high-calorie, nutrient-poor > food? but fat (or lard, in this particular discussion) is *not* a high- calorie, nutrient-poor food. calories *are* nutrients...macro- nutrients. fats are excellent natural sources of energy. and cancer cells cannot utilize fat, while they thrive on sugars. allene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2001 Report Share Posted August 31, 2001 Several nutritional experts say fat IS an important nutrient. Best Regards, Ratliff icq 1495914, msn ROBERT RATLIFF ,aim mtncurr22, http://www.copernic.com search engine http://www.ghisler.com> windows commander http://www.paltalk.com> voice/text chat (I'm TennRascal) <*> Good Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die. <*> -----Original Message----- From: Alan Lundin [mailto:aflundi@...] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:46 AM Subject: Re: another butter question * safallon@... (safallon@...) [010828 18:36]: * Subject: Re: another butter question: > > Dear Alison--the skimmed milk was given to the pigs! (Which turned it into > nutritious fat.) Sally Do you really believe that fat is nutritious? I find it hard to believe myself. The body can readily manufacture all but a few types of fat (w3 and w6), so why would the fat itself be of any importance? It seems much more reasonable to me that it is the fat-soluble nutrients that *may* be contained in fat that is of primary value. It is these nutrients that are not easy or even possible for the body to make. If so, feeding nutrient-poor skimmed milk to pigs, it seems, can only lead to nutrient-poor fat on the pig. I'm now leaning toward thinking that much of our sources of fat today are merely empty calories, in much the same way refined, white flour is. Am I totally off base here? --alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2001 Report Share Posted August 31, 2001 * ROBERT RATLIFF (bobratliff@...) [010830 18:28]: * Subject: RE: another butter question: > Several nutritional experts say fat IS an important nutrient. And I say 60 minerals in thousands of combinations other than a relatively small number of fatty acids are important nutrients. I contend that the 'experts' say fat is an important nutrient because when people comsume it, beneficial things happen to the health of the person. Was it the fat alone? I suspect it wasn't. I suspect it had more to do with the fat- soluble nutrients contained in the fat. The problem is that as time goes on, we allow our energy sources, carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, to become more and more " pure, " increasingly devoid of the other nutrients nature intended to be included. Have you read Price's _Nutrition and Physical Degeneration_? A major point (perhaps *THE* major point) he made is that the food of the healthy peoples he studied had a much higher density of nutrients than our food. His message seems to be clear -- raise the nutrient-density of our food. As I see it, we are in a race -- not against time or against other people, but against calories. The race is to consume as many nutrients per calorie as possible, and every time we consume empty calories -- refined sugar, refined flour, even nutrient-poor fat -- we are being set back in our fight for good health. We need to make sure that the fat we consume is of the highest quality and the nutrient-densest we can find. --alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2001 Report Share Posted August 31, 2001 Don't forget energy, fat provides a concentrated source, in a form that many believe is more easily digested than carbos. I believe many health problems are caused by OD'ing on carbohydrates. There is evidence that starches and dissaccarides are much more difficult for humans to digest than fats and proteins. Which is one reason NT advocates treating/predigesting grains and avoiding table sugar. Carbos can also cause a flood of insulin to be released resulting in highs and lows the body often can't deal with. Fat provides satiation which keeps people from being constantly hungry, giving them needed energy in a beneficial form. (Of course you can overdo everything, and I suspect the ideal fat/carbo/protein ratio differs for each individual based on genetics, present condition, etc.) Alan Wrote: But the body also craves sugar. I'd guess that in both cases, our bio/chemical/evolutionarily-derived bodies is expecting the sugar and the fat to be chuck full of nutrients, and when they are, they seem to satisfy the cravings, while the refined or low-nutrient versions don't. I might suggest that it is possible that the craving is not really for the fat (or sugar) so much as the nutrients, and if the apparent craving for fat (or sugar) doesn't go away, the food taken in didn't provide the body what it was looking for. --alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2001 Report Share Posted September 1, 2001 I mentioned this same thing to some friends of ours that have a small farm. Their comment was " it looks like you will be getting some pigs before long " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2001 Report Share Posted September 1, 2001 Dear Alan, Heating does not produce trans fats--they are made in a huge machine called a hydgroenator, with the addition of a catalyst. vitamin D is extremely important and the body cannot usually make enough. See the article on vitamin D on our website. There also are many other good things in animal fats--minerals, special antimicrobial fatty acids, etc. I don't understand why you are against fats. AFter all, mother's milk is loaded with fat. If you are not going to eat carbohydrates and not going to eat fats, what are you going to eat? Anything over 20% protein is very toxic. Remember the native AMericans, and in fact all indegenous peoples never ate lean meat--they always ate it with the fat. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2001 Report Share Posted September 1, 2001 When you eat more fats, you are not so likely to feel pessimistic. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2001 Report Share Posted September 1, 2001 >> Lard is really one of the best sources of vitamin D. (It is also a great cooking fat) I can only find a single brand of lard available anywhere in Phoenix, the stuff that is on the regular grocery store shelves. Is that stuff okay to use, or is it processed badly and rancid? Carma Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing worth knowing can be taught. - Wilde - carmapaden@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 SEveral of our advertisers sell lard and you can order it from them. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2001 Report Share Posted September 3, 2001 Read my last post on lard. Best Regards, Ratlifficq 1495914msn ROBERT RATLIFFaim mtncurr22http://www.copernic.com search enginehttp://www.ghisler.com>windows commanderhttp://www.paltalk.com>voice/text chat<*> -----Original Message-----From: Carma Paden [mailto:carmapaden@...]Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:41 PM Subject: RE: another butter question >> Lard is really one of the best sources of vitamin D. (It is also a great cooking fat) I can only find a single brand of lard available anywhere in Phoenix, the stuff that is on the regular grocery store shelves. Is that stuff okay to use, or is it processed badly and rancid? Carma Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing worth knowing can be taught. - Wilde - carmapaden@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2001 Report Share Posted September 3, 2001 Correct, most fast food places fry in trans fats. Stay away from them and eat butter and vegetable fats. Walter C. Willett put out a great new book "EAT, DRINK AND BE HEALTHY". It explains the fats very clearly. Crisco is a NO NO to. The book is just out and has very good up to date nutritional research. Best Regards, Ratlifficq 1495914msn ROBERT RATLIFFaim mtncurr22http://www.copernic.com search enginehttp://www.ghisler.com>windows commanderhttp://www.paltalk.com>voice/text chat<*> -----Original Message-----From: safallon@... [mailto:safallon@...]Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:50 AM Subject: Re: another butter questionDear Alan, Heating does not produce trans fats--they are made in a huge machine called a hydgroenator, with the addition of a catalyst. vitamin D is extremely important and the body cannot usually make enough. See the article on vitamin D on our website. There also are many other good things in animal fats--minerals, special antimicrobial fatty acids, etc. I don't understand why you are against fats. AFter all, mother's milk is loaded with fat. If you are not going to eat carbohydrates and not going to eat fats, what are you going to eat? Anything over 20% protein is very toxic. Remember the native AMericans, and in fact all indegenous peoples never ate lean meat--they always ate it with the fat. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2001 Report Share Posted September 3, 2001 Dear Alan, You have got it wrong on the trans fats--they are not formed by heat--you need a catalyst to do it. Suggest you get Enig's book Know Your Fats. We need to do the best we can in obtaining quality food, but never make a fetish about it. Do the best you can and they just bless the food and be grateful. Then make sure you take some superfoods (cod liver oil. nutritional yeast, azomite, etc.) to make up for the nutrients that should have been there. On the pigs, even those in confinement get ultra-violet light--otherwise they die--so even the worst quality lard contains vitamin D. Of course, lard from pasture-fed pigs is much better, but if your only choice is supermarket lard, that is infinitely better than margarine or shortening. We need to remember that for most people. their choices are limited to the supermarket. We need to give them something that is doable. Sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.