Guest guest Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 sorry many typos... bad keyboard. hope it was still clear enough > > > > > The more I read the more sure I am that licensure as an IBCLC is NOT a solution. It is an added expense to be sure but will add nothing over all to the professional image. Someone said hairdressers have a license and that only furtheres my belief that a license will not bring respect to health care providers in general. When it becomes required to be licensed I will change careers. Oh well. 20 years of experience no longer available to the moms I serve. What I do hope is this is known before I pay money to recert in 2015 because I am not wasting that money for a credential that will now mean nothing without a license. I get that some value insurance reimbursement. I get that some think it will help. But after all these years I am more sure it won't and instead will sit back and watch exactly what some of us are warning about come to be. But by then I will do something new. Good luck when they label all things breastfeeding help related a requirement to be licensed. Thinking that will be the end of mother to mother support too. This medicalizaton of all things female bothers me from how it limits my right to choose who cares for me when I birth to how it seeks to now limit who helps me with breastfeeding. This is more to me then if a woman can get insurance to pay. Because in the end if it limits who she can choose to hire it doesn't serve her well at all. > > > Pam MazzellaDiBosco > > > Pam MazzellaDiBosco. IBCLC > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.