Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

archives

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

<< I am wondering if we might consider making our archives private -- that

is, available only to list members. >>

Second the motion. I thought they were private already.

best,

phoebe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> I am wondering if we might consider making our archives private -- that

> is, available only to list members.

*Sorry. I was totally unaware of this. I'll look into it asap.

m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

>

> << I am wondering if we might consider making our archives private -- that

> is, available only to list members. >>

>

> Second the motion. I thought they were private already.

*Problem is, most lists are open to general scrutiny. Adam McLean's are

and so are those of several other lists I belong to. Also: WHO do you ask?

There's no proviso for it in any of the moderator-options available to us (I've

just spent an hour checking).

Any suggestions?

m (the rather unmoderating moderator today - certainly not very hot off the

mark, anyway)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike,

One suggestion is for us each to use a pseudonym or first name (as I tend to

do) as our sign on identifier. I had noticed this problem some time ago when

I typed in my name on a search engine and found only those JF conversations

that included my whole name. I just thought everyone but me knew that this

was happening. You may each with to try the same thing. Anyway, this is one

(albeit not the best) solution.

I know it must be a big pain to find another home for our group, but this

privacy issue thing is not insignificant in the least.

Greg

On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:13:14 +0200, JUNG-FIRE wrote:

> >

> >

> > << I am wondering if we might consider making our archives private --

that

> > is, available only to list members. >>

> >

> > Second the motion. I thought they were private already.

> *Problem is, most lists are open to general scrutiny. Adam McLean's are

> and so are those of several other lists I belong to. Also: WHO do you

ask?

> There's no proviso for it in any of the moderator-options available to us

(I've

> just spent an hour checking).

> Any suggestions?

>

> m (the rather unmoderating moderator today - certainly not very hot off

the

> mark, anyway)

_______________________________________________________

Send a cool gift with your E-Card

http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, on the other hand, I don't want us to lose the archives. That would be

a big loss for us, especially those who have not saved all the posts but

were relying on the archives to preserve the posts and threads for us.

Sara

Re: Archives

> Mike,

> One suggestion is for us each to use a pseudonym or first name (as I tend

to

> do) as our sign on identifier. I had noticed this problem some time ago

when

> I typed in my name on a search engine and found only those JF

conversations

> that included my whole name. I just thought everyone but me knew that this

> was happening. You may each with to try the same thing. Anyway, this is

one

> (albeit not the best) solution.

> I know it must be a big pain to find another home for our group, but this

> privacy issue thing is not insignificant in the least.

>

> Greg

>

> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:13:14 +0200, JUNG-FIRE wrote:

>

> > >

> > >

> > > << I am wondering if we might consider making our archives private --

> that

> > > is, available only to list members. >>

> > >

> > > Second the motion. I thought they were private already.

> > *Problem is, most lists are open to general scrutiny. Adam McLean's are

> > and so are those of several other lists I belong to. Also: WHO do you

> ask?

> > There's no proviso for it in any of the moderator-options available to

us

> (I've

> > just spent an hour checking).

> > Any suggestions?

> >

> > m (the rather unmoderating moderator today - certainly not very hot off

> the

> > mark, anyway)

>

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________________

> Send a cool gift with your E-Card

> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know, there is and can be no true privacy on the internet. I

suggest that no one write anything on any internet forum that he/she

would not be willing to see published in the newspaper. I try to follow

this rule myself (believe it or not).

Best regards,

Dan Watkins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 8/31/01 12:21:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

dwatkins5@... writes:

> As far as I know, there is and can be no true privacy on the internet. I

> suggest that no one write anything on any internet forum that he/she

> would not be willing to see published in the newspaper. I try to follow

> this rule myself (believe it or not).

>

>

That's the way i feel, too!

ao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Dear all, this is a general plea from a very frustrated archive user - can you

please update the subject window for your messages to reflect the nature of your

message, otherwise when you search the archives you will find that you can

expect anything (except for what you are looking for) under your search category

- the subject title seems to be the main " categorizing " factor. Thanks

Newton

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...