Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: grant proposal

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I tried to send this 2/9/05. Feedback needed!

Gwen

PROPOSED OUTLINE FOR SHORT GRANT PROPOSAL

by Gwen Hanson

9 February 2005

INTRO:

We decided we’d like to submit grant proposals under

the wing of another non-profit with the eventual goal

of creating our own organization.

Possible grantors: Foundation set up from CIGNA

lawsuit (deadline for 2 pager March 1), AAFP

(submission deadline June 1st I think), Wood

Foundation (RWJF) , others

Possible fiduciary agents: AMA, AAFP, IHI, others

POSSIBLE OUTLINE:

What Will We Do?

I. Definition of Ideal Healthcare office

II. Hypothesis #1 This model has better outcomes than

traditional models

III. Hypothesis #2 Regular use of standard metrics

will improve outcomes further

IV. Goals: Test above hypotheses. If they’re true,

establish tools to facilitate more participation in

this model.

Background- (only needed for full proposal, not 2

pager)

- Evolution of quality monitoring- include HMO’s, IOM

report on all the errors, penetration of EMRs,

historical and present ways we monitor quality.

- Flaws in US system today that impede quality

- Various examples of things that have been done to

try to bypass this- fee for service, early retirement,

concierge practice, employee docs etc

- Birth of ideal practices (Gordon )

V. Testing Hypothesis #1

A. Find outcomes study(ies) to use as comparison-

examples:

1. nationwide rate of BP control

2. Service Delivery Metrics (are these from IHI?)

i. % of pts that see the provider they prefer

ii. % of pts satisfied with waiting room time

iii % of pts satisfied with practitioner response

to their phone call

iv % of pts satisfied with time til they get an

appointment

3. Access- How far into the future is 3rd available

appt. (Goal: 0 days)

B. Write out instructions on following methodology

similar to theirs and see how we compare.

VI. Testing Hypothesis #2

Continue to measure in same ways periodically

throughout the year. Track results.

All results need to be collected and analyzed by a

statistician.

VII. If things go well and we do wish to disseminate

our practices:

A. Write a book- Model it after Starting a Practice

from the Ground Up

sold by AAFP. Will need contributors, editors, and a

publisher (AAFP? IHI?)

B. Website - model this after the AAFP/ Journals/

Family Practice Management website.

C. Advisors in different areas of expertise that new

“idealers” can contact by email.

D. Negotiate discount rates for whatever we can

obtain that might help newcomers…docalert, EMR’s, bank

loan packages…

E. Publicize our vision of where the EMR’s need to go

eg advances needed in registry, alerting, practice

guidelines etc. Communicate this info to vendors and

organizations like FPM and CMS.

How Will The Grant Money Be Used?

I. Manpower:

A. US! Participants in the study should get

reimbursed per task accomplished. We can create a list

of all the jobs, together decide fair re-imbursement

for each task, and then have people select the jobs

for which they are best suited.

Examples of jobs:

1. identify appropriate requests for proposals

2. write short proposals

3. CREATE BUDGET (this should be done sooner

instead of later since unrealistic budgets kill

projects)

4. Establish connection with a non-profit who will

apply for and administer grant(s).

5. Long grant proposal

6. Data collection (all of us and statistician)

7. Data analysis (statistician and us)

8. Write final paper with results.

9. Create book, website

10. Negotiate group discounts

11. Advisor responsibilities for answering

questions

12. Publicity stunts

B. Consultants:

1. Statistician for data collection and analysis.

There can be an hourly rate for the statistician’s

assistant and a higher hourly rate for the

statistician herself.

2. Grant writer? It’s probably better if Gordon

does this.

3. Other

II. Fraction of our overhead (rent, office supplies,

any clerical help)

III. OTHER

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gwen and all,

Gwen has done a truly amazing amount of work and I would like to commend you

on that. I have not even started my ideal practice yet (launch date this

June), but if you need me to help with anything, I will.

Where I think I can help in the future is with assistance in writing a start

up book. I have a degree in writing, and I plan to keep careful track of the

actual start up process I am currently suffering through to hopefully be able

to look back and learn from the process. I would not mind starting to compile

experiences from others on the listserve and developing a data base for a

future publication.

I also feel it is extremely important that we identify and expose the " flaws

that impede quality " in our current health care system. If we are able to do

nothing else, truly exposing the hypocrisy in our " helath care/care-for-the-

insurance-industry " system will hopefully go a long way.

Durango, CO

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:10:28 -0800 (PST)

Gwen Hanson wrote:

>

> I tried to send this 2/9/05. Feedback needed!

>

> Gwen

>

>

>

> PROPOSED OUTLINE FOR SHORT GRANT PROPOSAL

> by Gwen Hanson

> 9 February 2005

>

> INTRO:

> We decided we’d like to submit grant proposals under

> the wing of another non-profit with the eventual goal

> of creating our own organization.

> Possible grantors: Foundation set up from CIGNA

> lawsuit (deadline for 2 pager March 1), AAFP

> (submission deadline June 1st I think), Wood

> Foundation (RWJF) , others

> Possible fiduciary agents: AMA, AAFP, IHI, others

>

> POSSIBLE OUTLINE:

>

> What Will We Do?

> I. Definition of Ideal Healthcare office

>

> II. Hypothesis #1 This model has better outcomes than

> traditional models

>

> III. Hypothesis #2 Regular use of standard metrics

> will improve outcomes further

>

> IV. Goals: Test above hypotheses. If they’re true,

> establish tools to facilitate more participation in

> this model.

>

>

> Background- (only needed for full proposal, not 2

> pager)

> - Evolution of quality monitoring- include HMO’s, IOM

> report on all the errors, penetration of EMRs,

> historical and present ways we monitor quality.

> - Flaws in US system today that impede quality

> - Various examples of things that have been done to

> try to bypass this- fee for service, early retirement,

> concierge practice, employee docs etc

> - Birth of ideal practices (Gordon )

>

> V. Testing Hypothesis #1

> A. Find outcomes study(ies) to use as comparison-

> examples:

> 1. nationwide rate of BP control

> 2. Service Delivery Metrics (are these from IHI?)

> i. % of pts that see the provider they prefer

> ii. % of pts satisfied with waiting room time

> iii % of pts satisfied with practitioner response

> to their phone call

> iv % of pts satisfied with time til they get an

> appointment

> 3. Access- How far into the future is 3rd available

> appt. (Goal: 0 days)

> B. Write out instructions on following methodology

> similar to theirs and see how we compare.

> VI. Testing Hypothesis #2

> Continue to measure in same ways periodically

> throughout the year. Track results.

> All results need to be collected and analyzed by a

> statistician.

>

> VII. If things go well and we do wish to disseminate

> our practices:

> A. Write a book- Model it after Starting a Practice

> from the Ground Up

> sold by AAFP. Will need contributors, editors, and a

> publisher (AAFP? IHI?)

> B. Website - model this after the AAFP/ Journals/

>Family Practice Management website.

> C. Advisors in different areas of expertise that new

> “idealers” can contact by email.

> D. Negotiate discount rates for whatever we can

> obtain that might help newcomers…docalert, EMR’s, bank

> loan packages…

> E. Publicize our vision of where the EMR’s need to go

> eg advances needed in registry, alerting, practice

> guidelines etc. Communicate this info to vendors and

> organizations like FPM and CMS.

>

>

> How Will The Grant Money Be Used?

> I. Manpower:

> A. US! Participants in the study should get

> reimbursed per task accomplished. We can create a list

> of all the jobs, together decide fair re-imbursement

> for each task, and then have people select the jobs

> for which they are best suited.

> Examples of jobs:

> 1. identify appropriate requests for proposals

> 2. write short proposals

> 3. CREATE BUDGET (this should be done sooner

> instead of later since unrealistic budgets kill

> projects)

> 4. Establish connection with a non-profit who will

> apply for and administer grant(s).

> 5. Long grant proposal

> 6. Data collection (all of us and statistician)

> 7. Data analysis (statistician and us)

> 8. Write final paper with results.

> 9. Create book, website

> 10. Negotiate group discounts

> 11. Advisor responsibilities for answering

> questions

> 12. Publicity stunts

>

> B. Consultants:

> 1. Statistician for data collection and analysis.

> There can be an hourly rate for the statistician’s

> assistant and a higher hourly rate for the

> statistician herself.

> 2. Grant writer? It’s probably better if Gordon

> does this.

> 3. Other

>

> II. Fraction of our overhead (rent, office supplies,

> any clerical help)

>

> III. OTHER

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...