Guest guest Posted December 24, 2003 Report Share Posted December 24, 2003 This is a very interesting variation on the membership fee concept. The voluntary fee based on a perception of extra value. The extra fee makes me uncomfortable on the grounds that the US spends more on health care (by a LOT) than any other country in the world, without any particular advantage in terms of outcomes. It makes me more uncomfortable when employers pass on increasing amounts of the burden to their employees, resulting in financial hardship for an increasing number. Wal-Mart has taken the ultimate approach: $4000 annual deductible, they don't cover pediatric immunizations, and have other truly repugnant policies. The implication is that primary care is without value: " We'll cover you if you get so sick you have to see a specialist or go to the hospital. " More from the people seeking out care is a tough sell and will exclude more from care, exacerbating the downward spiral of our health care system. On the other hand, primary care is not where the exorbitant health care dollars are being spent. If we offer same day access, see people on time, and provide phenomenal evidence-based care based on the " Care Model " (see Planned Care on my web site www.idealhealthnetwork.com) then we ought to get something extra for it. Some insurers are beginning to notice. I'm working with a Medicaid HMO in Rochester NY, redesigning office practices serving inner-city vulnerable population in the North East. The HMO is willing and indeed eager to pay the primary care folks for doing the work you guys are doing. We'll test this out in the next year and go public with it as soon as we have some data. My goal is to create a compelling data set and story so that we can all be paid for the good work that results in the better outcomes. In the meanwhile, I want you folks to succeed! If you need to do something along the lines of an extra fee to close the financial gap in the meantime, do so. Be open with your patients about the problems and your attempts to fix them. Keep the fee as low as possible. Give special allowance to those who need your level of care but can't afford it. Carry your share of the load, but don't presume to take on more than you can carry or you'll get crushed. The software world has precedent here - the idea of share ware ( " Send me $10 if you like the program. " ) Some on this listserv have opened practices with similar fees. It would be great to hear from them about their experiences. Does the extra fee get in the way of contracting with insurers? Is it repugnant to patients? Have you taken your share of vulnerable populations? Gordon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.