Guest guest Posted January 12, 2004 Report Share Posted January 12, 2004 Please read all. There are various problems here to which the answer is there. Some we've covered completely, but we have many newcomers. Sometimes we have memory problems and simply need reminding. Tx http://www.drlowe.com/QandA/askdrlowe/mostrecent.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2004 Report Share Posted January 12, 2004 Eh, I don't really believe everthing this guy says. There's one instance where he wrote: (Most researchers consider chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia the same disorder.) I've never heard that term before but have heard that CFS and FM are NOT the same syndrome. They've found that FM patients have more of substance-P in their spinal fluid but I haven't heard them say that CFS patients have that too. Could be wrong because I don't have CFS and haven't read up on it that much. From what I did just read, it's NOT the same as FM. Also, he advises those with CFS and/or FM to NOT get flu shots, that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. This might be true for CFS patients, (don't know don't have it) but I don't think it's true for FM patients. I went ahead and got my flu shot and had no adverse reactions of any kind from it...well except a sore arm from the shot itself! In a nutshell, I don't agree with his beliefs about flu shots. {{hugs}} Debbie > Please read all. There are various problems here to which the answer is there. Some we've covered completely, but we have many newcomers. Sometimes we have memory problems and simply need reminding. > > > Tx > > > http://www.drlowe.com/QandA/askdrlowe/mostrecent.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2004 Report Share Posted January 13, 2004 And for every group participant that believes one way, there is another who believes the opposite. I for one do not think it is the immediate allergic reactions that are the main risk of vaccinations. I think it is the insidious damage to the immune system that they may be causing in many of us, especially those who are predisposed or particularly stressed. That damage is extremely hard to track back to its origins, so it will be a long time before there is any solid scientific evidence of the effects of immunizing everyone for every disease that ever was. > Of course there is always a risk when humans put something into > their body whether it be in the form of a vaccination, or what goes > into their mouth as in aspartame, splenda, supplements, or even > fried foods!. Why is that? Because every one of us is different. > The majority of people do not get allergic reactions to the flu > shot. If that were the case and nobody was getting it, there would > be alot more deaths each year from influenza. Just like there were > many years ago from small pox, etc. Those vaccines helped the > MAJORITY of people stay small pox free, as with most all > vaccinations. But, there will always be at least ONE person that is > allergic to one, or more of them and that's what's always published > in the media. They don't report how many people were saved by these > things, only the negative outcome of specific things. > > Another thing I personally believe, is that some of these doctors > that have all their beliefs on websites, just have too much time on > their hands for one reason or another. Now there are those that > still believe they are here on earth to help make people feel > better. I sometimes wonder why some doctors have all this time to > update websites and/or write books. Yes, they want to make money on > their books and is a reason many write them. What other reason > would they take time off, possibly, to write a book? Don't get me > wrong, I myself read books written by doctors but I don't take their > every word as if it's written in stone. Same way with info posted > on the internet. It's up to each individual person how that > information is interpreted and to believe 100% in what a doctor > writes, to me is not a good thing. The ratio of doctors that do not > have time to publish websites and/or write books is a far greater > proportion to those that do and it just makes me wary of believing > everything they say and goes back to the basic fundamental that for > every doc that believes one way, there will be another that doesn't > believe the same thing and will tell the flip side of the coin, so > to speak. > > {{hugs}} > Debbie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.