Guest guest Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 This article could just as well refer to ANY STRESS (not just childhood trauma). " Chronic fatigue syndrome remains a poorly understood disorder, and the suggestion that early-life STRESSES play an important role in the disease remains controversial. " " The researchers also tested all participants for levels of the hormone CORTISOL, which is associated with stress and the so-called " FOGHT OR FLIGHT " response. Low CORTISOL levels may indicate that the body does not respond to STRESS normally, CFS researcher Reeves, MD, of the CDC tells WebMD. " The article is referring to only a certain type of STRESS (childhood) but note how STRESS and LOW LEVELS OF CORTISOL and FIGHT OR FLIGHT response is mentioned here just as it is being mentiioned in many other writings on CFS. Instead of mentioning just childhood STRESS, the article could have been on any STRESS, such as a viral illness or an operation or a stressful work situation, that overwhelmed your body's stress handling ability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 I understand your point of view. I also understand that the affects of long term stress on a child whose body is growing, developing and changing can have a profound, long term effect. I think this type of stress and its possible effects should be specifically addressed. As a mother, it hurts to read it but it must be discussed and brought to everyone's attention. When reading the many articles about childhood trauma/stress and CFS, I try to put my parental ego aside. It's another piece in the CFS puzzle. My 2 cents P.J. > > This article could just as well refer to ANY STRESS (not just childhood > trauma). > > " Chronic fatigue syndrome remains a poorly understood disorder, and the > suggestion that early-life STRESSES play an important role in the > disease remains controversial. " > > " The researchers also tested all participants for levels of the hormone > CORTISOL, which is associated with stress and the so-called " FOGHT OR > FLIGHT " response. > > Low CORTISOL levels may indicate that the body does not respond to > STRESS normally, CFS researcher Reeves, MD, of the CDC tells > WebMD. " > > The article is referring to only a certain type of STRESS (childhood) > but note how STRESS and LOW LEVELS OF CORTISOL and FIGHT OR FLIGHT > response is mentioned here just as it is being mentiioned in many other > writings on CFS. > > Instead of mentioning just childhood STRESS, the article could have > been on any STRESS, such as a viral illness or an operation or a > stressful work situation, that overwhelmed your body's stress handling > ability. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Hi PJ, I don’t think anyone is questioning the long term effects of childhood abuse on later life. But, and it is a BIG but, childhood abuse is an incredibly accurate predictor for illness in adults – ALL illness, ALL diseases, are hugely over-represented in this population, I believe the figure I read once was 7 or 8 times the rate, compared with non-abused children. On the other hand, lots of abuse survivors do not go on to develop “CFS” or anything else either. Just to be perfectly clear, this is not specific to CFS, but for all disease! So to me, this is just another psychiatric shell-game, meant and only meant to emphasize the psychological as usual, and just look at the author, that REEVES from the CDC, who has already done irreparable harm for PWME <sigh>. The quality of the “research” is only as good as the intention of the researcher. Aylwin xox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 > reading the many articles about childhood trauma/stress and CFS, I > try to put my parental ego aside. It's another piece in the CFS > puzzle. > My 2 cents > P.J. Hi P.J., I admire your courage reading about childhood stress and CFS from a parent's perspective. I applaud your willingness to consider as many of the pieces of the CFS puzzle as possible. I appreciate your description of CFS as a puzzle. All illnesses are puzzles. People with the " same " illness, whether diabetes, cancer, CFS etc., suffer differently, express illness differently, have different outcomes, different levels of suffering or debilitation. Chronic or life-threatening illnesses offer opportunities for examining our lives for what is most important, what is most valuable, what is worth doing, what is worth skipping, who are friends are, who will travel our journeys with us and who will not. We may be devastated by those we love who we most want with us who may keep their distance after diagnosis. Even devastating disappointment offers opportunity to learn patience and appreciation for whatever relationships we are able to maintain after disappointment. I understand the psychic pain and depression from life circumstances and disappointing relationships go hand in hand with CFS even for people with no evidence of early trauma. This is hard, this set of symptoms and difficulties not to mention confusing and long lasting for many. The study states only 62% of study participants with CFS also experienced early trauma. A large number of CFS patients did not experience early trauma. An association has been made by a simple majority in one study. It's a puzzle. I find it helpful to look at it this way. Thank you P.J. toni http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/CFAlliance/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 CFS is an illness under researched and widely misunderstood as well as disrespected by the medical society and by the general public. Childhood trauma and/or stress are serious elements that may contribute to the onset of CFS for an individual (even if the amount affected are few). Childhood trauma and/or stress should be addressed specifically in regards to CFS. If you take issue with this particular article than read the others that have been posted on this website and the many others that are available publicly. However if you do not consider it a serious contributing factor even if only for the few, that's your right but all aspects whether large or small need to be investigated in my opinion. P.J. > > Hi PJ, I don't think anyone is questioning the long term effects of > childhood abuse on later life. But, and it is a BIG but, childhood abuse is > an incredibly accurate predictor for illness in adults – ALL illness, ALL > diseases, are hugely over-represented in this population, I believe the > figure I read once was 7 or 8 times the rate, compared with non- abused > children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 Well, that’s what makes this such an interesting group – we all do have different opinions! I’m an ME hard-liner, in that I go by Hummingbird or Hyde’s definition, and either you have ME or you have something else. There is no increased incidence of psychiatric disease or a background of abuse in people with strictly defined, sudden onset, infectious, neurological, ME, than in the general population. And I for one wish with all my heart, that “they” (all the researchers looking at ME in various ways, and “CFS” too) would put a tad more emphasis on true biomedical research into real treatments for the neurodegenerative, cardiac/circulatory, mitochondrial dysfunction, disautonomia, immune etc. aspects of ME, before more people die of cardiac/organ failure/neural inflammation/brain injury. There should also be a comprehensive medical assessment of people who have been told they have CFS, to see what they really do have. Much of this research was conducted on a population that only said in a phone survey that they had fatigue, which is patently ridiculous and unscientific. Meanwhile, these guys can blow smoke about psychiatric history and fill the journals with their self-serving bullhockey (a psychiatric population needs psychiatrists at a time when their patient base is rapidly shrinking, its simple economics to find new populations to lure into their lairs). The main stressors of having ME are a) being horribly, disablingly ill, losing one’s livelihood and income and subsequent plunge into poverty, chosen lifestyle, most of one’s friends and too often, the support of one’s family, c) being disbelieved and scorned in doctor’s offices, and psychiatrized without ever being given a proper psychiatric assessment or diagnosis, and d) dying from this disease, medically and socially unsupported, while the shrink researchers fiddle while Rome is burning. And that’s my opinion! Aylwin xox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 If this is true should there not be a lot of CFS in the obvious groups - such as children who grew up near battle areas of World War 2, or children who grew up in areas severely devastated by the 1930s depression ? You probably already know I wish there was a lot more research into the locations co-relation than the psychological side. - B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 > > Hi PJ, I don't think anyone is questioning the long term effects of > childhood abuse on later life. But, and it is a BIG but, childhood abuse is > an incredibly accurate predictor for illness in adults – ALL illness, ALL > diseases, are hugely over-represented in this population, I believe the > figure I read once was 7 or 8 times the rate, compared with non- abused > children. On the other hand, lots of abuse survivors do not go on to develop > " CFS " or anything else either. Just to be perfectly clear, this is not > specific to CFS, but for all disease! I agree with Aylwin 100%. I too recognize the importance of these factors in disease, but the intent here is suspicious. Personally my disease has nothing to do with (psychological) stress, and everything to do with viral injury to my neurological system. It wouldn't be so bad, if it wasn't the ONLY area they seem to be focusing on and pouring all the money into. Just another way to make us seem 'crazy'. take care, ness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Hi, PJ! You are right. In addition, childhood trauma or stress does NOT always mean abuse. The death of parent could cause long term stress even if the child is surrounded by love and support and counseling. Also even if this is a small or rare contributing factor to CFS, it's a vaild one in the complex web of this illness. Ursula Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 I was born 3 months premature and was therefore a " special baby " weighing only 2 pounds and a few ounces. My personal opinion, shared by my mother, is that this has been a large contributing factor to my development of fibromyalgia (diagnosed in my early twenties but I distinctly remember suffering from various aches and pains from the age of 11, possibly even before!). I am now 30 and in more pain than I could ever have imagined. The doctors in Salisbury (UK) are not particularly helpful and continually tell me that I am being pessimistic. My husband tells a different story - I am actually very optimistic and keep myself busy in an attempt to ignore the pain that the pills don't kill - I'm busy learning various linux operating systems, knitting, cross stitching, baking (when I'm able!), reading (six books of different topics and genres depending on my mood), card making, beading, etc etc. Whenever I have raised the possibility of premature birth in relation to fibromyalgia, doctors give me a funny look as if to say " who has the medical degrees here? " or " sweet little girl thinks she might have an opinion " - which is REALLY frustrating!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 I have been reading the posts about the study linking childhood trauma to CFS, FM & the like. I like what a lot of you have said in response to that. I feel as if I have to add in my two cents…and write up some of this, not so much for the group, but for myself, so bear with me. I was a battered child. My mother also committed suicide when I was 12. I know that I have suffered long term effect from the constant overdose of cortisol running through my system as a child and the trauma of the loss. I see the dysfunction in the way I react to lots of things. I have also suffered a huge amount of stress as an adult (raising three disabled children, one seriously mentally ill, abusive husbands, etc). However, I also think the research is a bunch of hooey. First of all, how does one define abuse? And secondly, how does a researcher know that when a person says they weren't abused as a child that they indeed were not? I have heard lots of people tell me they weren't abused then talk about going out and having to " cut a switch " or being thrown through a while. Denial runs deep. And, 62% is certainly not an overwhelming majority. It is barely significant. And, as someone said, abuse/stress leaves us vulnerable to all sorts of disease. I feel that my CFS/FM was caused by a combination of things. I am sure that my childhood played a huge part in it. I also think it was the type " A " personality thing too. It was making the decision to have FIVE children (obviously crazy! LOL). Also creating an environment for all this were many other things: moving, at 30, so a climate that was VERY different from one I grew up in and spent most of my life (moved from So Calif to Oregon); exposure to large amts of DDT as a child, raising a very mentally ill daughter who was in and out of institutions, was abusive, manipulative, cruel, and exhausting; multiple surgeries in my 30s; going to college in my 30s! (counseling degree, then a pysch degree, then two years of law school – I know, what was I thinking!, and then a PhD program which I left after I got my masters...got too sick to continue); A tubaligation causing lots of problems with hormones; a tubaligation reversal (not truly correcting the problem as shortly thereafter I lost one tube due to an ectopic pregnancy, then had two babies within two years and ended up having a hysterectomy); the hysterectomy; AND living in a very moldy house for 9 years. Not as simple as just my childhood trauma! DonnaL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 > > Well, that's what makes this such an interesting group – we all do have > different opinions! I'm an ME hard-liner, in that I go by Hummingbird or > Hyde's definition, and either you have ME or you have something else. There > is no increased incidence of psychiatric disease or a background of abuse in > people with strictly defined, sudden onset, infectious, neurological, ME, > than in the general population. Hi Aylwin, As always, couldn't have said it better myself! take care, ness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.