Guest guest Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Garnet, It is a right to be able to obtain that under FOIA as " they " have no right to censor anything public has pd. for and which can not be classified as protected as nat'l. security issues. However, having said that, as we know from experience, it sometimes takes a LOT of persistence by skilled lawyers to enforce the final disclosure of such materials .. which delay itself is basically a denial of the justice the FOIA was supposed to provide .. a great " equaler " ? On the cat-scratch fever not being significant w/humans ... I once worked with a beautiful young girl who lost her baby with some deformities also with the doc's diagnoses of cat-scratch fever. The couple owned no cats, had not been anywheres but to work & back, and the only " encounter " they could recall with a cat was a momentary one where a stray had come into their apt. & they'de put him out immediately, (without knowledge at that time of any danger). It was quite sad. Joyce Simmerman > > > > Yet if you look it up most medical literature says Bartonella > > infections are rarely significant and not a problem in humans! > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.