Guest guest Posted July 21, 2005 Report Share Posted July 21, 2005 NAAR needs to have their funding cut off completely. [ ] AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAAR Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy Shih, Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for Autism Research (NAAR). Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 Well I disagree. Listen to Dr. Shih, you may change your mind. I know that many parents are unhappy with NAAR because of their lack of biomedical research, but we asked him about it in the podcast. Go listen. > NAAR needs to have their funding cut off completely. > [ ] AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAAR > > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy Shih, > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for Autism > Research (NAAR). > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy Shih, Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for Autism Research (NAAR). Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 Not a chance. [ ] AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAAR > > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy Shih, > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for Autism > Research (NAAR). > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 What went wrong with the Montel Show? Sounded fine to me. NAAR's position is indefensible. How can anyone defend injecting a known potent neurotoxin into children? When I called them 3 years ago questioning their lack of funding of research regarding thimerosal and autism, I was told that no one has ever submitted to NAAR a proposal for such a study which meets their quality standards. I have a gut feeling that as long as they accept money from the CDC to run their organization, no one will ever meet their quality standards. Charlie > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy Shih, > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for Autism > Research (NAAR). > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 I listened to this entire broadcast hoping to hear something positive. However it only confirmed my stance on NAAR. I will not be raising another dime for them. My efforts will go towards organizations that are are non-biased and working to do something for my child right " now " not maybe some time in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 Always keep your friends close, but your enemies keep closer. J. Wallace Day > > Hmm - What went wrong on the Montel show... maybe the truth snuck > out... > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 > And give me a good reason why I want to listen to Andy Shih! You have to know the arguement in order to argue against it. If Sallie Bernard has joined recently, I think it merits attention. Maybe things are changing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 Sallie Bernard is with CAN, and has been for several years. Andy Shih is with NAAR. > > And give me a good reason why I want to listen to Andy Shih! > > You have to know the arguement in order to argue against it. > > If Sallie Bernard has joined recently, I think it merits attention. > Maybe things are changing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 I did listen and it just confirmed my stance with NAAR. I am not raising another dime for them. > > And give me a good reason why I want to listen to Andy Shih! > > You have to know the arguement in order to argue against it. > > If Sallie Bernard has joined recently, I think it merits attention. > Maybe things are changing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 Just playing devil's advocate here, because in reality, I do think that the mercury issue is very plausible (probable)... Why would you fault the man for doing what he thinks is best. He said, in the podcast, for you to do what you think is best, as he did. So why would you fault that? I think people are kind of hard on NAAR sometimes. They believe what they believe, I guess. I didn't get the feeling in interviewing Dr. Shih that they were absolutely 100% against the mercury issue. And, by the way, before everyone starts going off on AutismLink -- we are completely unbiased in our interviews. Our personal feelings have absolutely no bearing on the questions we ask or the guests we have on the show. In reality, both Jillian Duhl and I believe the mercury theory. Waeltermann Director, AutismLink ....who incidentally hasn't vaccinated either of her kids since the diagnosis. > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy > Shih, > > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for > Autism > > Research (NAAR). > > > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for > > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and > > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 You know you are worse than a " grief counselor " . The only thing that happened on Montel is a good portion of mainstream America got to eye-witness the type of closed-minded arrogance we families battle every single day. God Bless Lyn Redwood for having to go toe to toe with the Andy Shih's of the world. Skip the damage control. These charities are do-nothing fronts funded by Pharma dollars. In exchange the charities provide innocent little children for quacks like Shih to " practice " on. Drop the drug money and what are they? Nothing [ ] Re: AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAAR Just playing devil's advocate here, because in reality, I do think that the mercury issue is very plausible (probable)... Why would you fault the man for doing what he thinks is best. He said, in the podcast, for you to do what you think is best, as he did. So why would you fault that? I think people are kind of hard on NAAR sometimes. They believe what they believe, I guess. I didn't get the feeling in interviewing Dr. Shih that they were absolutely 100% against the mercury issue. And, by the way, before everyone starts going off on AutismLink -- we are completely unbiased in our interviews. Our personal feelings have absolutely no bearing on the questions we ask or the guests we have on the show. In reality, both Jillian Duhl and I believe the mercury theory. Waeltermann Director, AutismLink ...who incidentally hasn't vaccinated either of her kids since the diagnosis. > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy > Shih, > > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for > Autism > > Research (NAAR). > > > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for > > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and > > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 I've heard there are two side to every argument, but when both sides are emanating from the same mouth...what does that tell you about the character of the person? RE: Re: AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAAR I personally think it is good to listen to people who are speaking on behalfof our community. It is hard for me to hear the things he says - but thenext time someone says to me blah blah blah NAAR - I can honestly say - YesI have listened to their spiel and they are wrong and here is why.Jenn -----Original Message-----From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of R.Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 11:07 AMEOHarm Subject: Re: AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAARAnd give me a good reason why I want to listen to Andy Shih!> Hmm - What went wrong on the Montel show... maybe the truth snuckout... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 > Why would you fault the man for doing what he thinks is best. Because " what he thinks is best " is dangerous and wrong. Because the peds who damaged our children were doing what they thought best, and look at the result. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 A little hostile, aren't we? We're not doing " Damage control. " FYI -- we had one of the best interviews with Kirby (his words) that he's had yet. You know nothing about AutismLink. We are trying to be fair, something that obviously escapes YOU. > > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > > > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy > > Shih, > > > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for > > Autism > > > Research (NAAR). > > > > > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for > > > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and > > > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > > > > > > ======================================================= > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 Thanks for the compliment , we do work hard. I've been involved with Walk FAR for NAAR in Pittsburgh since the get-go...six years now. This year we raised over $12K. I wanted to hear the answers from Dr. Shih because I know that many parents are disheartened with NAAR's policies. In some cases, I agree, some I don't. I mean, clearly there's a genetic component to autism, I have two kids on the spectrum and my husband is definitely somewhere on the spectrum (I diagnosed him myself..LOL). I guess they have chosen to put the bulk of their dollars into genetic research in lieu of other areas because maybe at the moment, to them, it seems like that's the most plausible thing. It has taken me a long time to come around to believing the whole mercury thing. Bells went off at the homeland security act (something's not right here...hrm...), and then the more I looked into it the more it seemed so very plausible and true. And all of these parents CANNOT be wrong. I believe the parents -- we know our kids. So, in the end, I'm not defending anyone. Just as I wasn't defending Kirby when we interviewed him. (I got ALOT of flack from some people over that one too...) It's very simple, you either like what they said or you didn't. You either give your money, or you don't. W. > What bothered me is that with everyone's hard work, hard lives, slaving away at family and awareness of autism and mercury/thimerosal, he said he would have no problem giving his 2 month old thimerosal vaccines. I just don't get it. He could have at least said he was glad it was being removed. But I guess I, like many others, didn't get it until it happened to my child. > > By the way, I think autismlink is great, have sent it to everyone I know (who has children with asd) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 I caught the last half of the Montel show. I actually thought that Dr. Shih was absolutely adamant, and repeated several times, that studies don't back VACCINES causing autism. Lyn Redwood looked exasperated, again stating that it was the mercury/thimerosol factor, not the vaccine per se, and that she was for safe vaccines. Dr. Shih just resolutely ignored this distinction, repeating almost robotically, that there were no studies showing VACCINES caused autism. Montel asked Dr. Shih, given the choice between a thimerosol-free vaccinination, and one with thimerosol, in light of the explosion of autism and emerging evidence of toxic harm, would he still feel comfortable with recommending shots with thimerosol to parents. He said he would. It was like arguing with the Flat Earth Society, who insist those satellite pictures mean nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 IMO, the doctor wasn't convincing espousing his conviction that he didn't " think " there was a connection between vaccine mercury and autism. He very cleverly eluded references to such and droned on and on about genetics and rigorous scientific procedures, methodologies, as well as the wonderful support from such " esteemed " institutions as the CDC & NIH. The only time he mentioned mercury was in the context of " environmental factors " ...along with environmental aluminum, environmental pesticides, etc. in order to introduce as many " red herrings " as possible and exonerate vaccines. Seemed to me his double talk was an attempt to examine the minutia of many " trees " ; ANY agent that could remotely be associated with neurological injury, in order to obscure the general public's view of the " forest " ; the mercury poisoned masses. Ultimately, this does further damage to our children. Precious time is lost for many children as parents and clinicians have to wade through " propaganda " .(ie, mercury is good, no evidence of harm from injecting good mercury, I would happily inject my own child with mercury, and lastly, government agencies aren't capable of being influenced by conflicts of interest) Vaccine injured children would be better served if time, effort, and financial resources were directed supporting ethical biomedical treatments and not squandered by countless committees. > You know you are worse than a " grief counselor " . The only thing that happened on Montel is a good portion of mainstream America got to eye-witness the type of closed-minded arrogance we families battle every single day. > > God Bless Lyn Redwood for having to go toe to toe with the Andy Shih's of the world. > > Skip the damage control. These charities are do-nothing fronts funded by Pharma dollars. In exchange the charities provide innocent little children for quacks like Shih to " practice " on. > > Drop the drug money and what are they? > > Nothing > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 Not that type at all. Will you continue to refuse to accept that Dr. Shih intentionally appeared on Montel intending to be a mouth-piece for pro-mercury, when it mattered most, on a nationally syndicated TV program? The man has no credibility. He made unfortunate statement after unfortunate statement. If you continue to insist upon it, I should doubt your intentions. [ ] Re: AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAAR A little hostile, aren't we? We're not doing " Damage control. " FYI -- we had one of the best interviews with Kirby (his words) that he's had yet. You know nothing about AutismLink. We are trying to be fair, something that obviously escapes YOU. > > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > > > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy > > Shih, > > > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for > > Autism > > > Research (NAAR). > > > > > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, criteria for > > > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, thimerosal and > > > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > > > > > > ======================================================= > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 Yep, I refuse that. I don't think he's a bad guy. > > > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > > > > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy > > > Shih, > > > > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for > > > Autism > > > > Research (NAAR). > > > > > > > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, > criteria for > > > > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, > thimerosal and > > > > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ======================================================= > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 As you please. [ ] Re: AutismLink Radio -- Dr. Andy Shih of NAAR Yep, I refuse that. I don't think he's a bad guy. > > > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > > > > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with Dr. Andy > > > Shih, > > > > Director of Research and Programs at the National Alliance for > > > Autism > > > > Research (NAAR). > > > > > > > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, > criteria for > > > > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, > thimerosal and > > > > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, and more! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ======================================================= > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 In a message dated 7/23/2005 3:26:54 PM Central Daylight Time, cindy@... writes: If mercury CAUSED autism, everyone who had a shot with mercury in it would be autistic. That's not the case. Some kids, IMHO, are predisposed genetically and immunologically and that, combined with mercury, made for a deadly mix So....thimerosol then more likely than not causes autism, in those genetically susceptible, isn't that what your are saying? And it looks from the numbers--1 in 166 kids--that's a pretty sizable population. Doctors don't have the slightest problem pointing to lead poisoning as the reason for myriad neurological issues, including significant learning disabilities--especially when there has been a known exposure (peeling lead-based paint). Nor is there any question, when fetal alcohol poisoning is exposed, knowing that a baby will most likely have many learning and behavioral issues--hence warnings on every bottle of alcohol for pregnant moms. But when we are talking mercury--the second most toxic substance known--and talking about injecting ANY amount, no matter how miniscule, into babies and toddlers (and we sure as heck aren't talking minuscule), it boggles common sense that any entity would attempt to minimize the effects and insist it's okay--and not related to all those autistic diagnoses. The only difference between the first two examples of lead and alcohol, is that those don't occur at the hands of the medical and pharmaceutical establishments. So you know what--mercury does cause autism, in some kids. It fact, it causes autism in A LOT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 Not everyone is out to get us, you know. I think the guy does what he thinks is right. Do I think he's some kind of pathological liar in secret deals with big pharma and government agencies? No. Do I think NAAR is some fabulous organization beyond reproach? No. As for my motives, you can think whatever you want. I know that I'm fair, and so do many others, and that's what matters. W. P.S. -- Anybody have any ideas for our next radio show? We asked Kennedy, but he's too busy. Any suggestions are appreciated. Doesn't have to be regarding the mercury issue. > > > > > Tune in to AutismLink Radio's newest podcast at > > > > > http://www.autismlink.com/radio for our interview with > Dr. Andy > > > > Shih, > > > > > Director of Research and Programs at the National > Alliance for > > > > Autism > > > > > Research (NAAR). > > > > > > > > > > Dr. Shih discusses what NAAR is currently researching, > > criteria for > > > > > funding, biomedical research currently being funded, > > thimerosal and > > > > > mercury, what went wrong on the Montel show, > and more! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ======================================================= > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 Just because a family has more than one child on the spectrum doesn't mean it must be genetics only. It still could be the vaccines combined with genetics. Genetics may play a role in that some children are " genetically " unable to handle heavy metals like mercury. In the same way as some children are " genetically " pre-disposed to allergies, asthma etc. I think it's foolish to waste money trying to figure out what gene is causing the problem, when the simple solution is to just get rid of the mercury! Let's try that and in 3-4 years or so we should see if it made a difference or not. I believe the the health organizations are afraid to do that, because they are worried that we just may be right. I didn't do the walk for the first time this year. And I don't plan to walk in 2006. I would rather my money go towards organizations who are doing something to help my child now. Or who are more open than NAAR about studying this issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2005 Report Share Posted July 23, 2005 Hopefully a lot of these do-nothing charities will get some exposure. Do you know where the dollars come from? Do tell. >As for my motives, you can think whatever you want. I know that I'm >fair, and so do many others, and that's what matters. > W. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.