Guest guest Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 I am aware that how things are worded can have an influence over people, I recently came across quite a good example of such in a book I am reading. The book is 'Mind Hacks' by Stafford & Webb (I think I have mentioned it before). This particular example is on p.247. Below are two different versions of the same problem, but worded different. Version 1. A lethal disease is spreading through the city of which you are mayor. it is expected to kill 600 people. Your chief medical adviser tells you that there is a choice between two treatment plans. The first strategy will definitely save 200 people, whereas the second strategy has a one-third chance of saving 600 people and a two-thirds chance of saving no one. Which strategy do you choose? Version 2. A lethal disease is spreading through the city of which you are mayor. It is expected to kill 600 people. Your chief medical adviser tells you that there is a choice between two treatment plans. The first strategy will definintely kill 400 people, whereas the second strategy has a one-third chance that nobody will die and a two-thirds chance that 600 people will die. According to the book the second version makes it seem that you are starting out in a losing position and that people are more likely to take risks if they feel they are in a losing position to begin with. I found this interesting and have to wonder just how much this type of influencing goes on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.