testing

[Guest guest]

testing

_________________________________________________________________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

[Guest guest]

Hi, Klaus,

I've only had my machine (a pad type) about a month, but after the first

couple of days of working with it, I began muscle testing to choose the

frequencies I needed to run. This was partly to keep myself from feeling

that I had to run every frequency in the CAFL! But it has worked very

well. Over the past few weeks, I've gone through dental, parasite and

candida frequencies, first muscle testing all the ones for a particular

condition (such as parasites) that I could find in the various lists. This

way I created a " selected " list. Then I retested the selected frequencies

each day to decide which ones to run that day. I found that some

frequencies dropped off the list after one day, some after two days, and so

on. Eventually, when the muscle testing was negative on all of them, I

moved on to the next condition.

I'm relatively new to muscle testing but fortunately I have been using it

long enough to trust it by now. I am very glad I've had this tool to use,

and in the past month I have often wondered how on earth people decide

which frequencies to run if they don't do muscle testing! (At least those

who don't have an F-scan...)

After I posted my query about mineral deficiency, (Thank you,

McInturff, for your reply and all the great stuff on your site!!) I went

off to the health food store and muscle tested myself for all the

variations on the Cal-Mag theme. I came up with one that had additional

minerals like manganese and zinc and began to feel better within moments of

swallowing the first pill! Have been sleeping better, too.

Has anyone else used muscle testing or related techniques this way?

I have one other question. Before I started muscle testing, I ran 4.9 and

then 965 for several minutes each. At the time, I didn't realize the

importance of timing myself and I may have run each frequency for as much

as ten minutes. This was done at 5 AM with the hope that I would get

relaxed enough to go back to sleep. I did feel relaxed and was able to go

back to sleep, but when I woke up and for most of the day I felt as if I'd

been drugged! It gradually wore off, but I was a bit alarmed at the

time. Has anyone else had a similar experience?

Any other tales of problems arising from the overuse of specific frequencies?

Barbara

_________________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

<< Dear Walba,Rick I am from Mumbai, India,I am using Rife machine

manufactured by the lab of San Diago.I am using dowsing to find the

frequency,polarity,amplitude and the time per sittings also I dowse to see

the date for next sittings.I am able to get very successful results. >>

What kind of dowsing is it that you do. Could you explain this technique?

Klaus

[Guest guest]

<< Klaus,

Where would one be able to obtain a finger tester and/or try a stick pad ?

Thanks >>

The finger tester you can purchase from OMS (Oriental Medical Supplies) As

for the stick pad, Just about any plastic surface will do. You may try a

search either stick plate, or stick pad. I've seen these made commercially

and used by chiropractors, but never found out were to get them. If your

handy with tools it's pretty easy to make one, all you need is two rings one

that fits snug inside the other, then you need a piece of cellaphane type

plastic. Put the cellaphane over the smaller ring and press the larger ring

over the smaller ring trapping the cellaphane inbetween making a tight

membrane that you would rub with your fingers, if they slide easily that

would be a positive response if they stick that would be a negative response.

Most people use a small amount of talc with this method.

Klaus

[Guest guest]

>The key, I've found, is be sure that you're clear. Clear your mind, clear

>any expectations. And most of all don't expect to just be able to jump

>into being able to test right away.

Klaus, I couldn't agree more about the need to be clear and detached from

the outcome of your muscle testing if you hope to get good results,

especially for questions concerning yourself. I also agree that it's not

something that you can pick up in a few days or a few weeks. It takes

practice, practice, practice. But what a wonderful tool to have once you

get it!

Nina, thank you for those excellent tips. I was fortunate to have some of

those taught to me when I began muscle testing. I didn't know about the

importance of having the person look down, though. Do you know what

significance NLP puts on looking down?

As for the position of tester and subject, we were taught to be at the side

of the person so that there would be no eye contact between tester and

subject. That definitely screws up the results! But it may also be that

facing someone, even if she is looking downward, is more challenging or

intrusive -- and therefore more likely to interfere with the testing --

than being to one side. (If the tester is close enough to touch the

subject, regardless of whether she is to the side or in front of the

subject, I think that their fields will be intermingling, so that doesn't

sound like a good justification to me for staying to the side.)

The other thing that can create problems is " neurological disorganization "

or " switching " . I believe these terms come from Applied Kinesiology. (I

learned them in the context of Energy Psychology.) To test to see whether

your subject is " disorganized " , put one hand just above the head with the

palm down. Muscle test. Then flip the hand so that the palm is up. Test

again. If palm down tests strong and palm up tests weak, the person is

fine and the muscle testing should work. If palm down tests weak and palm

up tests strong, he is disorganized and that needs to be treated.

As you mentioned, Nina, there are a positions to hold which correct this

disorganization, but I find for most people that 3-4 drops of the Bach

Flower Rescue Remedy in half a glass of water takes care of it. Some

people are more inclined than others to become " disorganized " and may need

to have this corrected in the middle of a muscle testing session. So if

you're doubtful of the answers you're getting, redo this test. I always

begin a muscle testing session by checking the client's organization. I

occasionally need to test my own organization as well, since a disorganized

tester will not be able to get accurate results even if the subject isn't

disorganized.

The second thing I check at the outset is the person's hydration: The

subject picks up a lock of her hair in one hand. If the muscles of the

other arm test strong, she is sufficiently hydrated. If weak, give her a

drink. Almost as soon as she has finished the water (even a small glass),

you can do the same test again. It usually resolves very quickly.

There is a good discussion of these techniques in a book by Fred Gallo,

" Energy Diagnostic and Treatment Methods " (Norton, 2000). It's a fairly

expensive book aimed at energy psychologists. See Gallo's website at

http://www.energypsych.com/

Another less expensive book for the lay person that also teaches muscle

testing is " Cure Your Own Allergies in Minutes " by Jimmy . He also

has a manual you can download. I haven't checked it, but it may have some

muscle testing information in it. See

http://www.subtlenergy.com/pages/allergiesmanual.html

For finger muscle testing, I liked the website someone else posted on this

list (to whom I say thank you!): http://www.ascending-star.com/kinesiol.htm

My preferred method for self-testing and surrogate testing sounds something

like Klaus' stick pad, except I use my thumbnail instead of a pad. I

repeatedly slide my index finger over the thumbnail of the same hand as I

ask the question. If my finger continues to slide smoothly over the

thumbnail each time, the answer is no. If it gets stickier and stickier

and ultimately stops sliding altogether, the answer is yes. (Just to

confuse things, I know some people for whom smooth = yes and sticky =

no.) This one really took some practice, but it has the advantage of being

a one-handed technique and it can be done very discreetly if need be.

I hope this will be useful information to those of you who might be

interested in acquiring this wonderful skill!

Barbara

[Guest guest]

Hi; I'm glad to see that you've come to your senses after all the brain

washing you endured in medical school, I really respect MDs that have to

courage and take the time to study the alternative healing techniques, it's

very good to make your aquantance, you could please give us name?

I used the pendulum for many years, and found it to be quite accurate, but a

bit slow. I make some pendulums now, out of stirling silver. The top or

handle is an anhka the pendulum it's self is half an oz. of silver in the

shape of a pyramid. I use a radionics box to put a shield of clearing energy

around the pendulum to help with clearity.

Thanks for sharing the things that you do in your practice. Klaus

>Dear Sir/madame,I use pendulum for dowsing,I am MD from allopathy but over

>a period of past 12 yrs.I am also using Accup.,Homeopathy,Gem therapy,Batch

>flower remedy,Radionics,herbs,Pranic healing,Fengshui,and recent addition

>is RIFE.I believe no PATHY is 100% full proof.I always do AURA DIAGNOSIS,and

>find out which mode of therapy is suitable to an individual.Like it is

>said one cannot find two persons with the same finger print,so why not

>apply a broder out look and find the most suitable mode of treatment

according

>to the merrit of the patients AURA.Thank U

[Guest guest]

Well we all know that people are different, like using a pendulum, for me a

clockwise rotation is yes response, the opposite for No. but I've run into

may people that this is just opposite. No ryme or reason for it, it just is.

Klaus

>I didn't know that, Klaus. In a way, it makes sense. For example, when

>

>I'm going through a list of frequencies, I do have a sense of the energy

>

>rising as I come to a " yes " . Different kind of stress perhaps...

>

>Barbara

[Guest guest]

Dear Group:

I think I got here some where in the middle, please excuse me if it was

stated before, but could some one, briefly, exlpain how you do muscle testing

and what equiptment you need, and the procedure? Thank's in advance.

Yours Truly

R. Hausman

" Walba, Rick " wrote:

> It is very technique intensive. A retiring local chiro and expert Applied

> Kinesiology practitioner would not turn over or sell his practice to his

> chiro son, because the son just couldn't get the hang of AK.

>

> Rick

>

>

>

> I've tried muscle testing, but I've gotten inconsistant results

> (even

> with test questions concerning my age).. Maybe I'm not doing

> something

> right (or something else is interfering with the test). I suspect

> that

> some people are better at it than others. Snip-Snip