Guest guest Posted September 5, 2005 Report Share Posted September 5, 2005 Hi there, it would be great to get feeback: Recently heard a tape with and a woman who's father abused her when she was 3, by asking his daughter to sit on her lap and " play " with him. talks to the woman as a " little 3 year old " and turns out the father asked his daughter to " play " with him and woman sees she did it for love. The adult woman can see that the little 3 year old " chose " to do it but didn't say no cos didn't want her father to leave/not love her and so on. So the woman can turn around " my father abused me " to " I abused me " Question: the woman is now seeing that she " chose " to play with her father. but at same time is saying little 3 years old don't know the work (we do it now, so we don't continue as children) and woman herself says how a 3 year old can't make those choices. And this, of course, defines abuse, that the child isn't capable of saying no. So in what sense is the woman at the end owning her (albeit tiny) part in it? seems contradictory: " I abused me " while it's clear that as a 3yr old, she couldn't choose not to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.