Need mold investigator for church in philly area

[Guest guest]

Please reply directly to me. Investigation is for minister with mold

sensitivities.

Thanks.

May

May Indoor Air Investigations LLC

Tyngsborough, MA

www.mayindoorair.com

Quoting iequality :

> There are 2 messages in this issue.

>

> Topics in this digest:

>

> 1. Re: [sickbuildings] GoozNews, Continued Conflicts Of Interests In Fe

> From: Jack Dwayne Thrasher, Ph.D.

>

> 2a. Re: Vapor barriers in attic floor insulation

> From: barb b w

>

>

> Messages

> ________________________________________________________________________

> 1. Re: [sickbuildings] GoozNews, Continued Conflicts Of Interests In Fe

> Posted by: " Jack Dwayne Thrasher, Ph.D. " toxicologist1@...

> drthrasher12

> Date: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:17 am ((PST))

>

> I suggest that you watch the below on Statins (mold and bacteria

> derived anticholesterol drugs) and brain damage. The conflicts run

> deep. As an example do a Google search on Statins and Aspergillus

> tereus. A. tereus is a common contaminant in WDB. I have case of

> severe myopathy in a 43 year old woman where A. tereus was present

> along with Penicillum spp and S. chartarum. Dr. Blaylock who is

> featured in the below utube is no on the quack list.

>

>

>

>

> Jack Dwayne Thrasher, Ph.D.

> Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist

> www.drthrasher.org

> toxicologist1@...

>

> Cell:

>

>

> Lee Crawley, M.ED., LADC

> Trauma Specialist

> sandracrawley@...

>

> - Cell

>

> " The ultimate success of a truth depends not on the many but on the

> perseverance and earnestness of the few " .

> Emma Goldman

>

> This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be

> considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or

> redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my

> prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy

> laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served,

> please destroy the original message contents. If you have received

> this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender

> of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies

> you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance.

>

>

>

> [sickbuildings] GoozNews, Continued Conflicts Of Interests

> In Federal Science Advisory Boards.

>

>

>

>

> FYI, as elections get closer looks like we may be experiencing a little

> back slide in disclosure of conflicts of interest affecting Federal science &

> health policies.

> _http://gooznews.com/?p=3521_ (http://gooznews.com/?p=3521)

> “Lack of disclosure undermines the credibility of the advisory committee

> process and undermines public trust in the fairness of the

> regulatory process,

> †Dr. Nissen, a cardiologist at the Cleveland Clinic, told the

> Journal. The process is further undermined if the agency skirts its own rules

> to placate critics on Capitol Hill "

> " The latest scandal was turned up by investigative reporters for the

> British Medical Journal, where many of the studies outlining the

> risks from birth

> control pills first appeared. Their report, which appeared earlier this

> week in the _Washington Monthly_

>

(http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ten-miles-square/2012/01/the_yaz_men_members_o\

f_fda_pan034651.php) , revealed that

> at

> least three obstetricians/gynecologists on the committee had financial ties

> to Bayer. Not only that, the FDA knew about the financial conflicts of

> interest and didn’t tell the public.

> The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday followed up with some juicy details

> about the ties between some of the researchers and Bayer. For instance, Dr.

> a Hillard, an obstetrics professor at Stanford University School of

> Medicine, attended two meetings sponsored by the company in 2010 to help it

> deal with the blood clot controversy, and was paid “less than $10,000†for

> her efforts, the paper reported. She, like the others named in the Monthly

> article, voted to keep the pills on the market.

> So where does Capitol Hill come in? Last October, Senators Bennet

> (D-Co.), Burr (R-N.C.), and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) introduced

> legislation that would loosen the FDA’s conflict of interest policies. The

> ostensible goal? To speed up the review of medical products. That legislation

> followed statements by FDA Commission Margaret Hamburg that the agency was

> having difficulties finding people without conflicts of interest to serve on

> its 55 committees.

> The FDA, like every federal agency, is forbidden from appointing

> scientists with conflicts of interest to its technical advisory

> committees. However,

> the law allows exceptions. If the agency needs that particular person’s

> expertise, it can grant a waiver as long as it is disclosed to the public. It

> can also waive the conflict if it is considered too minor to actually

> affect a person’s judgment. Unfortunately, the law does not specify what is

> considered “de minimus.†$50,000? $5,000? $500? "

> Merrill's Disclosure:

> " Time for some personal disclosure: I spent five years during the 2000s as

> a public interest advocate lobbying to ban the use of scientists with

> conflicts of interest on federal advisory committee "

>

>