Guest guest Posted July 27, 2001 Report Share Posted July 27, 2001 For the last 24 hrs., I have been thinking about our postings relevant to emf's, studies I've read over the years about emf exposure, and the fact rifes benefit---not sicken---patients. Also, thank you for the individual emails. I welcome the chance to learn more. While emf's in general are harmful, I somehow suspect researchers have only considered continuous fields in their studies. Those would include exposure to cell phone emissions, electric blankets, emf's from power lines, xrays and the ilk. Inasmuch as rife and related instruments have been linked to the remission of cancers that emf's cause, one must ask a question. Is there a difference betwen the emf of a rife (and related) machines and emf's from sources I've mentioned (or others) that produce a continuous field? The answer is yes. The emf of a rife is PULSED. This apparently changes the characteristics of the energy. Logically, that would apparently explain why rife's emf are curative not causative Does anyone know if emf vs. disease studies have been done using PULSED DC as the source of the emf? Blessings dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.