Guest guest Posted January 9, 2002 Report Share Posted January 9, 2002 A local MD here in Seattle had a patient F.E. with late stage prostate and bone cancer. He told F.E. to get a Rife machine, and he was able to obtain a single coil version of the EMEM3 that was produced at that time. Six months later, the MD called me to say that the unit seemed to be doing some good for F.E., and after a year he called to say that F.E. was now cancer free. Shortly after that, F.E. contacted me for a nutritional consultation and I had a chance to learn the details of his treatment. Somehow he had gotten the idea that he should only use 727 Hz. So he would run 727 with the phanotron tube as close to his abdomen as he could get it for fairly long run times - half an hour or longer each day. A radionics saliva test showed that moderate levels of BX virus remained. 727 appears to have reduced the tumors and even had some effect on the vurus. The virus score would have been much higher untreated. The EMEM3 uses a spark gap and produces a damped wave as pictured at http://www.royalrife.com/emem2.html. Dick http://www.royalrife.com Re: [rife-list] Photon Sound Beam > > (1) I understand that most of the rife machines are using resonance > > frequencies to kill the unwanted micro-organisms in our body, why is > > Photon Sound Beam designed by Ed Skilling using resonance frequencies > > to restore the balance and health of the diseased cells that respond > > to these frequencies in our body? > > Because it only uses one frequency (and its harmonics) perhaps? > > > Are these two types of frequency > > machines operating on different theories? > > The Rife Bare transmits the frequencies via RF. I am not too familiar > with the PSB but it sounds like an EMEM set on a single frequency, > albeit a generally useful one. Plus, in contact mode their seems > to be more action on the body, perhaps a generalized " zapper-like " > action as much from the voltage and current as the frequency, so this > could still be effective for a number of maladies, even if it set to a > single frequency. > > > (2)The " Sweep Resonator " built by Ed Skilling sweeps from 0 to 50000 > > hertz by shifting frequencies every 2 to 3 minutes. This means that > > if the sweep is to be completed in reasonable time of a few hours, > > each shifting will be in the range of about 500 hertz, that is, each > > of the following frequencies, 0, 500, 1000, 1500, ..., will be turned > > on for 2 to 3 minutes. With this large frequency gap, can the sweep > > still be effective? > > I think that in the audio range, frequencies must be run within > 2 or 3 Hz of the " ideal " frequency to be effective when run for a > short time, like 3 minutes. But, any large scan whether it be > by 1 Hz or 1000Hz will address a large number > of pathogens due to the harmonics, heterodyning, and such. > I think it is most effective to scan by 1Hz increments, like > 2000 - 2600Hz, then run the hits that were found for the full > three minutes. > > turf > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.