Re: Freedom of Speech Censorship

[Guest guest]

Bob,

Thanks. I could use some help. I got the transcript of the trial from Friday which I did not attend for fear of immediate incarceration for refusing to be silenced of what occurred in the prior case and its continued adverse impact on US public health policy.

You should see the language. It looks like a scripted play. It appears that since the courts and plaintiff are unable to provide any evidence corroborating the reason given for malice or any evidence that I was ever impeached as to the subjective belief in my five words that were the sole cause of action of the prior case that I am gagged from writing of by the new case - they are going for the "poor thing, she's crazy" defense.

About two months ago, the court appointed a contempt of court attorney to "help" me. On Jan 6th, before the trial, I submitted an affidavit stating that I specifically did not give this person permission to represent me in the Contempt of Court hearing.

During the hearing this person brought it to the court's attention that the court had the power to order a psychological exam of me, "Nonethe less. It is certainly within the Court's power to order it." She stated that she had discussed a mental exam with the plaintiff's attorney, prior to the hearing. (This person, appointed by the court to "help" me, has the evidence of what occurred in the prior case).

Her above statement was made after the court stated, "I'm telling you if you have any influence with her. I would do anything I could to get her examined if I can. By the psychiatric unit downtown. I was prepared to see if I could get that done today. And you know, people aren't supposed to participate in criminal proceedings if they're incompetent and her competence in my mind is a serious question. "

This was supposedly a civil contempt of court hearing - not criminal. Additionally, the court awarded the plaintiff (who has never been able to corroborate reason given for malice or state how the sole cause of action words translate into a maliciously false accusation of perjury), over $19,000.

BROWN knows. Does nothing.

Or writing the ACLU since this clearly is a violation of your civil rights.

I did. They said call us if you go to jail.

It might also be helpful to write the chief justice of the California supreme court. (unless, of course, they are part of the problem.)

lol. That was my thought, too. However, one of the exhibits of why I should be held in Contempt were letters I sent to the CJ and other members of California's Judicial Council on September 11, 2011, seeking help to stop the harassment and they were posted on Katy's Exposure - while evidencing (among other things) the courts' computer entries do not match with the case file and the case files do not match with each other. Those are Clerk of the Court, Government Code 6200 violations, which are criminal and punishable by jail time.

They want me to retract the direct evidence of what occurred in the prior case and issue an apology on Katy's or I am going to jail on February 10, 2012. I couldn't adhere to that order even if I wanted to. The owner of that blog would NEVER permit me to do that. Too many lives at stake. She has MANY of the linked legal documents from the cases and it is discussed how this case has aided to keep the science fraud in courtrooms over the mold issue that toxicological models can be used by themselves as proof of lack of causation of individual illnesses.

They actually had the audacity to request that the December letters to OSHA & the CIAQ (that you endorsed) and as posted on Katy's be taken down from the website and apologized to the plaintiff for posting (because when you go on Katy's if you don't click on the link a prior posting shows where the sole cause of action phrase is used - while discussing what occurred in a case that is a matter of public record).

This is something that our industries trade association IAQA should also become involved with.

After all, this industry is based on eliminating the adverse health effects of mold in

the in at risk population. Exactly, what you champion.

The ignorance of a jurist is this matter not onl y is hurting you, but hurting the public

health.

That would be great. If I don't get some help, I am going to jail for speaking the truth in America about a vast problem that continues to fuel confusion, contention and misinformation over this issue.

I can't do what the courts are directing. Its not in my power. No doubt once I am in jail, I will have a mental exam that deems me mentally incompetent. Who knows where it goes from there. Labotomy? (just kidding..kinda)

I blew whistle on billions in scientific fraud, who is involved, and how they are connected in mass marketing it into policy for the purpose of misleading the courts. I had no idea what a big whistle I was blowing or how far they would go to keep it silent of the courts' aiding it to continue. Scary stuff. Sunlight is my only hope.

Sharon