Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Digest Number 520

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

CM (cervical mucous) is FREE!

On 11 Apr 2006 02:18:19 -0000 nfpprofessionals writes:

> There are 25 messages in this issue.

>

> Topics in this digest:

>

> 1. The latest fertility monitor

>

> 2. Re: The latest fertility monitor

>

> 3. RE: The latest fertility monitor

> From: " hannaklaus@... "

>

> 4. Re: Fw: Re: Watery discharge

> From: " hannaklaus@... "

>

> 5. Re: The latest fertility monitor

>

> 6. RE: The latest fertility monitor

>

> 7. Re-Introduction

>

> 8. Re: The latest fertility monitor

>

> 9. Re: The latest fertility monitor

>

> 10. NFP Conference: April 21 Toledo

>

> 11. RE: The latest fertility monitor

>

> 12. correction of typo re: Watery discharge

> From: " hannaklaus@... "

>

> 13. RE: Digest Number 516

>

> 14. Re: Atrophic Vaginitis

> From: datmcg@...

> 15. Re: Atrophic Vaginitis

> From: " hannaklaus@... "

>

> 16. RE: Re-Introduction

>

> 17. RE: The latest fertility monitor

>

> 18. " Fear Culture "

> From: NFPLI@...

> 19. Re: Re-Introduction

>

> 20. RE: Re-Introduction

>

> 21. Re: Re-Introduction

>

> 22.

>

> 23. lubricants

>

> 24. Re:

> From: obdoc2000@...

> 25. Re: Atrophic Vaginitis

>

>

>

>

________________________________________________________________________

>

________________________________________________________________________

>

> Message: 1

> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:43:48 -0400

>

> Subject: The latest fertility monitor

>

> Some list members might be interested in this new product:

> http://www.ovwatch.com/

>

> I can see why - if it works as advertised - it could be better than

> urinary LH testing. But it isn't clear to me how (if at all) it'd

> be

> better than the Clearblue Monitor - which also tests for estrogen as

> well as LH - to detect pre-LH-surge high fertility as well as peak

> fertility.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> [This message contained attachments]

>

>

>

>

________________________________________________________________________

>

________________________________________________________________________

>

> Message: 2

> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 16:06:15 -0400

>

> Subject: Re: The latest fertility monitor

>

>

> >

> > Some list members might be interested in this new product: *

> > http://www.ovwatch.com/* <http://www.ovwatch.com/>

> >

>

> By my math, $120 for the watch, and $33 a month for sensors.

>

> Cue is $300. https://www.zetek.net/

>

> jim

>

> --

> Jim & Margaret Van Damme

> Couple to Couple League-Central New York

> http://cny.ccli.org/ <== Big NFP site

> ---------------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> [This message contained attachments]

>

>

>

>

________________________________________________________________________

>

________________________________________________________________________

>

> Message: 3

> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 18:04:15 -0400

>

> Subject: RE: The latest fertility monitor

>

> I would be good to have Joe Stanford comment on the use of his data

> to conclude that Intercourse on peak -4 is the best day to achieve

> conception. Perhaps I missed it, but I could not find a single

> reference to a scientific article about effectiveness of their

> device, only references as to the type to cycle most apt to be

> suitable for the device, and the fact that it is not meant to be

> used to avoid conception. They say that data are in file. The

> have managed to buy an exhibit booth at the upcoming ACOG meeting,

> as well as several District meetings.

>

> Hanna Klaus, M.D.

> Natural Family Planning Center of Wash. D.C. and Teen STAR Program

> 8514 Bradmoor Drive

> Bethesda, MD 20817-3810

> Tel. , ®

> hannaklaus@..., hklaus@...

> http://www.teenstarprogram.org

>

>

>

> The latest fertility monitor

>

>

> Some list members might be interested in this new product:

> http://www.ovwatch.com/

> I can see why – if it works as advertised – it could be better than

> urinary LH testing. But it isn’t clear to me how (if at all) it’d

> be better than the Clearblue Monitor – which also tests for estrogen

> as well as LH – to detect pre-LH-surge high fertility as well as

> peak fertility.

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...