Guest guest Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 Hello, I'm hoping some of the experts on the board will help me out. I'm locked into an ongoing debate with my consultant regarding the number of trials being run on my child's program. The consultant has been running 20 trials per program. My other therapists have been complaining to me that my son seems bored with the programs, and they believe it's related to the sheer number of repetitions of each program per day. He has become disruptive and very inattentive. She seems to be inflexible on this issue of the number of trials. She claims that the research shows that 20 trials per program is best. Like I said, I think my son has become very bored with the 20 trials, and this is leading to disruptive and inattentive behaviors. I was under the impression that 10 trials was the norm, not 20. I don't see the point of running 20 trials, if it causes increased errors and lower success rates. I would greatly appreciate your views on the matter, and any research you could point me in the direction of, either for or against the 20 or the 10 trial protocol. I want to discuss this with her on Friday, and really am at a loss as to how to find this specific type of information. My community library does not have any journals or an extensive collection of books on the topic. Thank you in advance for any suggestions and input, Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 In a message dated 3/1/2005 6:21:11 PM Central Standard Time, abanymom@... writes: > She seems to be inflexible on this issue of the number of trials. > She claims that the research shows that 20 trials per program is > best Hi there:) I would start for asking her to site the research and review it with you. Number of trials is determined by many many factors and is certainly case by case child by child, program by program. She should welcome your inquiries as any consultant must be willing and glad to answer the questions why/ how/ and " tell me more " . love to all, kat kat www.firstyearsinterventions.com www.autismtreatment.info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 Hi, I'm a parent and I can't point you to research, but as a parent, stick to your guns! Your instincts are right! My consultant calls my child the one trial kid because he picks things up fast. Your consultan't shouldn't be so hung up on " rules " but more in tune with how your child learns. Perhaps a reminder that that's what the program is for in the first place, to teach your child to learn. If he's beyond 20 trials he's beyond 20 trials. If you can't negotiate something it may be time to seek out a new consultant. Trust what you're feeling, since early on other parents in my support group have told me, " you know your child best, trust your gut " . It hasn't been wrong yet! Best of luck, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 We have this issue, too, with the teacher in our school district's so-called ABA program... No, I don't have the research, but here are my issues with massed trials: 1. They lead to rote responding. I would prefer for my son to attend and discriminate, and not just respond rotely. 2. What is really being taught? After 1 or 2 trials, it seems that the response would become echoic, instead of, for example, a mand, tact, RFFC, etc. 3. Not only would it be boring, it seems that would deny a child a real opportunity for reinforcement, leading to escape behaviors Geraldine [ ] Question re Mass Trials - is 10 or 20 the norm and why?? > > > > Hello, > > I'm hoping some of the experts on the board will help me out. I'm > locked into an ongoing debate with my consultant regarding the number > of trials being run on my child's program. The consultant has been > running 20 trials per program. My other therapists have been > complaining to me that my son seems bored with the programs, and they > believe it's related to the sheer number of repetitions of each > program per day. He has become disruptive and very inattentive. > > She seems to be inflexible on this issue of the number of trials. > She claims that the research shows that 20 trials per program is > best. Like I said, I think my son has become very bored with the 20 > trials, and this is leading to disruptive and inattentive behaviors. > I was under the impression that 10 trials was the norm, not 20. I > don't see the point of running 20 trials, if it causes increased > errors and lower success rates. > > I would greatly appreciate your views on the matter, and any research > you could point me in the direction of, either for or against the 20 > or the 10 trial protocol. I want to discuss this with her on Friday, > and really am at a loss as to how to find this specific type of > information. My community library does not have any journals or an > extensive collection of books on the topic. > > Thank you in advance for any suggestions and input, > > Therese > > > > > > > > > > List moderators: Jenn - ABAqueen1@... > Steph - Stephhulshof@... > > Post message: > Subscribe: -subscribe > Unsubscribe: -unsubscribe > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 Wouldn't you get bored if someone kept asking you what is 1 X 1 20 times in a row. With my clients, I sometimes only do 5 trials, The number of trials you do does not really mean mastery for the kid. The kids will get bored and even answer wrong and even act out. So yes 20 trials is to much. We don't even teach typical kids like this, so why would we teach children with autism with this by just drilling an answer to them. The learning does need to be authentic and related to the child in order to reach mastery and this does work for children with autism. Maybe you can do a search on the 5 stage of learning and bring that the table. Crawford, BCABA abanymom <abanymom@...> wrote: Hello, I'm hoping some of the experts on the board will help me out. I'm locked into an ongoing debate with my consultant regarding the number of trials being run on my child's program. The consultant has been running 20 trials per program. My other therapists have been complaining to me that my son seems bored with the programs, and they believe it's related to the sheer number of repetitions of each program per day. He has become disruptive and very inattentive. She seems to be inflexible on this issue of the number of trials. She claims that the research shows that 20 trials per program is best. Like I said, I think my son has become very bored with the 20 trials, and this is leading to disruptive and inattentive behaviors. I was under the impression that 10 trials was the norm, not 20. I don't see the point of running 20 trials, if it causes increased errors and lower success rates. I would greatly appreciate your views on the matter, and any research you could point me in the direction of, either for or against the 20 or the 10 trial protocol. I want to discuss this with her on Friday, and really am at a loss as to how to find this specific type of information. My community library does not have any journals or an extensive collection of books on the topic. Thank you in advance for any suggestions and input, Therese List moderators: Jenn - ABAqueen1@... Steph - Stephhulshof@... Post message: Subscribe: -subscribe Unsubscribe: -unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.