Guest guest Posted January 5, 2005 Report Share Posted January 5, 2005 , i read your post regarding your concern over your consultant's programming decisions. Let me preface by saying that I find instructional control and reducing negative behaviors is important in order to begin teaching. You consultant should have the expertise to assess and prioritize behavior programming. However, my concern is that you didn't mention any attempts at teaching functional and positive behaviors, while also eliminating negative behaviors. Best practice includes teaching alternative, positive behaviors during reduction of negative behaviors. If possible, the alternative, positive behavior targeted should also serve the same function as the negative behavior. I would review the " Autism SIG Guidelines " (recently updated) and bring to you consultant's attention: Section IIa- 8,9,10 The Guidelines are found at: _www.behavior.org_ (http://www.behavior.org/) Click on " Behavioral Solutions " and Select " Autism and ABA " Under " Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and Autism " Select " The Autism SIG of ABA's Guidelines for Consumers " I would simply discuss your concerns with your consultant. There may be some very good reasons why he/she is making the recommendations he/she is making. Open communication with your consultant is very important and if he/she is experienced and qualified to consult, you should be given a detailed explanation of why he/she is making these decisions. Good luck, Selma ez, M.S.Ed., BCBA ABA/VB Consultant _www.abachicago.com_ (http://www.abachicago.com) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.